NOVEMBER 2021

VOlUME 04 ISSUE 11 NOVEMBER 2021
The Paradox of Thrift: A Case Study of United States of America
Mathias A. Chuba
Department of Economics, Achievers University Owo, Km 1, Idasen-Ute Road, P. M. B. 1030, Ondo State, Nigeria
DOI : https://doi.org/10.47191/ijsshr/v4-i11-34

Google Scholar Download Pdf
ABSTRACT

Vermann (2012) and Thies (1996)’s papers indicate that the paradox of thrift is no longer in vogue in United States of America (USA). This paper argues that the paradox of thrift is still applicable to USA even though she is operating with sufficient demand. The main objective of this paper is to determine whether the paradox of thrift is applicable to USA after the Great Depression. In doing this, a vector error correction model was estimated using annual data of gross national income, gross domestic saving, gross domestic investment and final consumption expenditure from 1971 to 2020. The results of the investigation showed that final consumption expenditure and gross domestic saving increase when gross national income increases. Gross national income falls and current saving is unchanged when previous saving rises. The paradox of thrift is applicable to USA after the Great Depression. The target of economic policy should be gross national income and not gross domestic saving because naturally both final consumption expenditure and gross domestic saving will increase if gross national income increases in USA.

KEYWORDS

Paradox of Thrift, Vector Error Correction Model, United States of America
JEL Classification: C01, E12, E21

REFERENCES

1) Amacher, R. C. and Ulbrich, H. H. (1986). Principles of Macroeconomics, South-Western Publishing Co., Cincinnati, Ohio.

2) Bahovec, V. and Erjavec, N. (2009), Uvod u ekonometrijskuanalizu, Element, Zagreb.

3) Bhaduri, A. and Marglin, S. (1990), Unemployment and the Real Wage: The Economic Basis for Contesting Political Ideologies, Cambridge Journal of Economics, Vol. 14 Issue 4, pp. 375–393.

4) Chuba, M. A. (2021), The Paradox of Thrift: Empirical Evidence in Nigeria, International Journal of Social Science and Human Research, Vol. 04 Issue 10, pp.3026-3035. DOI: 10.47191/ijsshr/v4-i10-50, www.ijsshr.in.

5) Dickey, D. A. and Fuller, W. A. (1979), Distribution of the Estimators for Autoregressive Time Series with a Unit Root, Journal of the American Statistical Association, Vol. 74 No. 366, pp. 427-431.

6) Enders, W. (1995), Applied Econometrics Time Series, John Wiley and Sons, New York.

7) Enders, W. (2015), Applied Econometric Time Series, John Wiley and Sons, London.

8) Fanti, L. and Zamparelli, L. (2020), The Paradox of Thrift in the Two-Sector Kaleckian Growth Model, DiSSE Working Papers No. 06/2020, Sapienza-University of Rome.

9) Feasel, E., Kim, Y. and Smith, S. C. (2002), Investment, Exports, and Output in South Korea: A VAR Approach to Growth Empirics, Review of Development Economics, Vol. 5 Issue 3, pp. 421-432.

10) Gujarati, D. N. (2004), Basic Econometrics, Fourth Edition, Tata McGraw-Hill Publishing Company Limited, New Delhi.

11) Jhingan, M. L. (2003), Macro-Economic Theory, 11th Revised and Enlarged Edition, Vrinda Publications (P) Ltd, Delhi.

12) Johansen, S. (1988), Statistical Analysis of Cointegrating Vectors, Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Vol. 12, pp. 231-254.

13) Keynes, J. M. (1936), The General Theory of Employment, Interest and Money, Harcourt, Brace and Co., New work.

14) Palić, I., Dumičić, K., and Barbić, D. (2016), The Estimation of Money Demand Elasticity: Case of Croatia, International Journal of Research in Business, Vol. 4 No. 9, pp. 89-98.

15) Palić, I., Žmuk, B. and Grofelnik, B. (2017), The Long-Run Impact of Personal Income Taxation on Economic Development: Evidence from Croatia, Croatian Review of Economic, Business and Social Statistics, Vol. 3 No. 1, pp. 35- 44. DOI: 10.1515/crebss

16) Samuelson, P. A. (1958), Economics, Fourth Edition, McGraw-Hill, New York.

17) Singh, R. (2018), Analysis of the Paradox of Thrift during Two Great Recessions, International Journal of Management and Applied Science, Vol. 4 Issue 3, pp. 74-78. http://iraj.in

18) Thies, C. F. (1996), The Paradox of Thrift: RIP, Cato Journal, Vol. 16 No. 1, pp. 116-127.

19) Vermann, E. K. (2012), Wait, Is Saving Good or Bad? The Paradox of Thrift, Economics Newsletter, May 2012, pp. 1-3, Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis

VOlUME 04 ISSUE 11 NOVEMBER 2021

Indexed In

Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar