VOlUME 04 ISSUE 11 NOVEMBER 2021
Tаkhirjon Baxodirovich Safarov
Independent researcher, Prosecutor General’s Academy
Google Scholar Download Pdf
ABSTRACT
This article researches the issue of disciplinary responsibility of judges as a type of legal liability and its legal basis. It also provides a comparative analysis of the concept of disciplinary responsibility of judges and the views of scholars who have interpreted the content of this concept. The concept of disciplinary offenses of judges, its composition and differences from administrative offenses are discussed. Advanced foreign experience in disciplinary proceedings against judges has been studied. The article analyzes the problems in practice in the field of disciplinary liability of judges and makes recommendations for its improvement.
KEYWORDS:legal liability of judges, disciplinary liability of judges, disciplinary responsibility, disciplinary offense, composition of disciplinary offense, legal basis of disciplinary liability of judges.
REFERENCES
1) It was approved by the UN General Assembly with the resolutions 40/32 of November 25, 1985 and 40/146 of December 13, 1985. Approved by the Oliy Majlis of the Republic of Uzbekistan on May 30, 1997.
https://www.un.org/ru/documents/decl_conv/conventions/indep.shtml. (last seen date: 13.10.2021 y.).
2) International Covenant on civil and political rights. Approved by the resolution of the UN General Assembly on December 6, 1966 2200 a (XXI). The Oliy Majlis of the Republic of Uzbekistan adopted the resolution on August 31, 1995.
3) European Convention on human rights. Rome city 1950 year 4 November.
https://www.echr.coe.int/Documents/Convention_RUS.pdf
4) Fursov D. A., Kharlamova I. V. Theory of justice in a brief three-volume presentation on civil cases. Vol. 1 : Theory and practice of the organization of justice. Moscow, 2009. p. 117.
5) Petukhov N.A., Yermoshin G.T. Independence of the judge of the Russian Federation: modern problems of ensuring // Russian Justice. 2013. No. 3. pp. 11-15.
6) Decree of the president of the Republic of Uzbekistan "on measures to radically improve the structure of the judicial system of the Republic of Uzbekistan and improve the effectiveness of its activities" dated February 21, 2017.https://www.lex.uz/docs/3121087.
7) Decree of the president of the Republic of Uzbekistan on measures to ensure more effective organization of the judicial and legal systems of the Republic of Uzbekistan “on measures to ensure more effective protection of rights and freedoms of citizens” dated October 21, 2016..https://www.lex.uz/docs/3121087.
8) Ershov V. V. Judicial power In a state governed by the rule of law: diss. ... doct. jurid. sciences'. Institute of State and Law of the Academy of Sciences of the Russian Federation. -M., 1992. - p. 89.
9) Kolokolov N. A. Judicial reform: one step forward, two steps back? Russian judge. 2001. No. 12. - pp. 11-15.
10) Paleev M. S., Pashin S. A., Savitsky V. M. The Law on the Status of Judges of the Russian Federation: scientific and practical. comment. / edited by V. M. Savitsky. - M.: BEK, 1994. - p. 15.
11) Radutnaya N. V. An attempt on the inviolability of a judge. Russian justice. 2001. No. 12. - pp. 11-12.
12) Tseplyaeva G., Yablokova I. De vasto and the duty of the judicial community. Russian justice. 2001. No. 11. pp. 31-33.
13) Tantsyura L. A., Semenyaka V. V. some issues of disciplinary responsibility of judges. Bulletin of economic proceedings. 2011. № 4. – pp. 108-113.
14) Selivanov A. A. compliance with the principles of independence and disciplinary responsibility of judges: issues of legislation and practice. Ethical and legal problems of ensuring the independence of judges: materials of the International Conference. Nauk. - prakt. seminar (Kharkiv 30-31 Berez. 2005) / editorial board : V. V. Stashis (chief editor) et al. - KH.: K.: TSNT "Hopak", 2006. - pp. 34-50.
15) Kleandrov M. I. The status of a judge: legal and related components.М.M., 2010.
16) Bakhrakh D.N. Legal responsibility under administrative law // Administrative law and process. 2010. No. 1. p. 2
17) Syshchikova T. M., Shatskikh M. V. Disciplinary responsibility of judges / Judicial power and criminal procedure. 2016. No. 1.В.V. 186-194
18) See Recommendations CM/Rec(2010)12 of the Committee of Ministers to Member States on Judges: Independence, Efficiency and Responsibilities (adopted by the Committee of Ministers on November 17, 2010 at the 1098th meeting of Deputy Ministers), paragraph 69. Also see the European Charter on the Status of Judges (Strasbourg, July 8-10, 1998), adopted by the European Association of Judges and published by the Council of Europe, [DAJ/DOC (98)23], paragraph 5.1.
19) Recommendation CM/Rec(2010)12 of the Committee of Ministers to member states on judges:independence, efficiency and responsibilities https://rm.coe.int/16807096c1.
20) “Measures for the effective implementation of the "Bangalore Principles of Judicial Conduct" adopted by the Judicial Panel on Strengthening the Integrity of Judicial Bodies at a meeting in Lusaka, Zambia, January 21-22, 2010, paragraph 16.1.
21) ENCJ: Development of Minimum Judicial Standards III - Minimum standards in relation to the assessment of professional activity and the irremovability of the judiciary, Report 2012-2013, p. 20
22) Organic law on the judiciary of Spain 6/1985, of 1 july,
https://www.legislationline.org/download/id/6791/fle/Spain_law_juidiciary_1985_am2016_en.pdf, (last viewed date: 13.10.2021).).
23) ENCJ: Minimum Judicial Standards V - Disciplinary Proceedings and Responsibility of Judges, Report 2014-2015, pp. 33-34.
24) Recommendations of the Kiev Conference on the Independence of the Judiciary in Eastern Europe, South Caucasus and Central Asia – 2010, https://www.osce.org/files/f/documents/a/a/73488.pdf.
25) Conclusion of the Venice Commission CDL-AD (2015)042, 21 December 2015.
26) The regulation “On the procedure for conducting service inspections in relation to judges”, approved by the resolution of the Supreme Council of judges of the Republic of Uzbekistan dated March 1, 2018 № SOKQ-541-III.
27) Sections 129, 134-135 of the Austrian law “On the activities of judges and prosecutors”; article 313 of the Bulgarian law “on the judicial system”.
28) Article 33 of the law of Albania “On the establishment and activities of the Supreme Council of Justice”.
29) Opinion of the Advisory Council of European Judges (CCJ) No. 3 (19) on the principles and rules governing the professional conduct of judges, in particular, ethical standards, conduct incompatible with duty and impartiality, November 19, 2002, paragraphs 72 and 77 (v).