OCTOBER 2022

VOlUME 05 ISSUE 10 OCTOBER 2022
Toothache in the Literature: Dostoyevsky’s ‘Notes From Underground’ and Hans Christian Anderson’s ‘Aunty Toothache’ as Examples
Mohammed Khalid Mahmood
BDS, MSc (Sulaimani University), PhD (Aix-Marseille University, France)
DOI : https://doi.org/10.47191/ijsshr/v5-i10-42

Google Scholar Download Pdf
ABSTRACT

Every form of art bears tracks from the artist’s real or fictive experience. Physical pain as an important human experience have been discussed, described and painted in many literary works. In addition, there are enough proofs to believe that toothache – a unique representative of bodily pains- is an old friend of humanity. Hence, it is more than natural to see the reflections of this symptom in the written literature. In this essay we are going to focus on two particular literary works of different genres; a novella and a fairy tale: Dostoyevsky’s ‘Notes from Underground’ and Hans Christian Anderson’s ‘Aunty Toothache’. These two authors and these two particular works have been studied in many different aspects. However, the place and importance of the concept of ‘Toothache’ was not investigated in previous analyses. Therefore, the subject of this paper is justified in one hand, original and unprecedented on the other hand. As it shall be seen, Dostoyevsky uses toothache as a tool to attack the basics of ‘Rational Egoism’ in 19th Russia and employs it to counter-argument against natural and historical determinism in favor of human’s free will. In the case of Anderson, toothache is an allegory about friendship and art in which toothache accompanies, and is compared with the pain of striving to produce a piece of art.

REFERENCES

1) Leitch, V.B., et al., The Norton anthology of theory and criticism. 2018: WW Norton & Company.

2) Suddick, R.P. and N.O. Harris, Historical perspectives of oral biology: a series. Critical Reviews in Oral Biology & Medicine, 1990. 1(2): p. 135-151.

3) Dostoyevsky, F., Notes from Underground, trans. Constance Garnett. New York: Dover, 1992. 4: p. 16-24.

4) Chernyshevsky, N.G., A Vital Question: Or, What is to be Done? 1886: TY Crowell.

5) Barstow, J., Dostoevsky's" Notes from Underground" versus Chernyshevsky's" What Is to Be Done?". College Literature, 1978. 5(1): p. 24-33.

6) Frank, J., Nihilism and" Notes from Underground". The Sewanee Review, 1961. 69(1): p. 1-33.

7) Dew, R., Dostoevsky’s Greatest Revelation: Understanding Human Nature and the Role of Suffering in The Brothers Karamazov and Notes from Underground. 2012.

8) Wanner, A., The underground man as Big Brother: Dostoevsky's and Orwell's anti-utopia. Utopian Studies, 1997. 8(1): p. 77-88.

9) Yolen, J., From Andersen On: Fairy Tales Tell Our Lives. Marvels & Tales, 2006. 20(2): p. 238-248.

10) Andersen, H.C., Aunty Toothache. Hans Christian Andersen: The Complete Stories: p. 893-902.

11) Kanner, L., The tooth as a folkloristic symbol. Psychoanalytic review, 1928. 15(1): p. 37-52.

12) Zipes, J., Hans Christian Andersen: the misunderstood storyteller. 2014: Routledge.

13) Bain, R.N., Hans Christian Andersen: A Biography. 1895: London: Lawrence and Bullen.

VOlUME 05 ISSUE 10 OCTOBER 2022

Indexed In

Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar