NOVEMBER 2022

VOlUME 05 ISSUE 11 NOVEMBER 2022
Using ClassDojo to Enhance Online Interaction in English Learning at Lower Secondary Schools
1Nguyen Thi Hong Minh,2Vu Thu Ngan
1,2Faculty of Foreign Languages Education, Thai Nguyen University of Education, Viet Nam
DOI : https://doi.org/10.47191/ijsshr/v5-i11-34

Google Scholar Download Pdf
ABSTRACT

The purpose of the study is to use the ClassDojo application supplemented to conventional English class to enhance interaction in English learning at a lower secondary school in a northern city of Vietnam. Forty 7th graders in the academic year 2021-2022 were involved in the study as the participants and survey respondents. Two questionnaires were distributed to the students before and after the implementation of such a blended class to collect data on their interaction practices in their virtual classroom as well as their feedback on this mode of learning. The study results revealed that ClassDojo significantly enhances online interaction in English learning in terms of the learner-instructor, learner-learner, and learner-content interaction. The findings also indicated that students generally appreciate the integration of this classroom management application in English learning. Finally, some recommendations were provided upon the use of ClassDojo to improve interaction in English virtual classrooms.

KEYWORDS:

ClassDojo, online interaction, virtual classroom, learner-instructor interaction, learner-learner interaction, learner-content interaction

REFERENCES

1) Amin, A. R. (2015). Patterns of teacher-students interaction. Undergraduate thesis submitted to Department of English Education, UPI

2) Al-Mubarak, A. (2004). The effects of Teaching by using virtual classrooms through the worldwide web Internet on the achievement of the learners of the education technologies at the faculty of education, King Saud University. MA. King Saud University, SaudiArabia

3) Baker, J. A. (1999). Teacher-Student Interaction in Urban At-Risk Classrooms: Differential Behavior, Relationship Quality, and Student Satisfaction with School. The Elementary School Journal, 100(1), 57–70. http://www.jstor.org/stable/1002161

4) Benson,P (2001). Teaching and researching autonomy in language learning. Harlow: Pearson Education

5) Brown, H. D. (2001). Teaching by principles: An interactive approach to language Pedagogy (2nd ed.). San Fransisco: Longman

6) Dagarin, M. (2004). Classroom interaction and communication strategies in learning English as a foreign language. English Language and Literature Teaching

7) Dewey, J. (1916). Democracy and education: An introduction to the philosophy of education.Retrieved from October, 2021 http://books.google.co.id/books?id=jq

8) Doug Sandler (2019). ClassDojo: Helping students, teachers & parents embrace the new school year. Retrieved from October 2021 http://www.dougsandler.com/news/2019/9/6/classdojo-helping-students-teachers-amp-parents-embrace-the-new-school-year

9) Dudeney, G., & Hockly, N. (2007). How to teach English with technology. New York, NY: Pearson Longman.

10) Elley, W.B, & Mangubhai, F (1993) ELLEY, The Impact of Reading on Second Language Learning. Reading Research Quarterly

11) Güldeniz Kaplan (2021). Improving the positive behavior of primary school students withthe gamification tool "ClassDojo”. Ilkogretim Online - Elementary Education Online, 2021.

12) Hiltz, S. (1995). The virtual classrooms: Learning without limits via computer networks. Norwood, NJ: Ablex Publishing Corporation.

13) Hrastinski, S. Asynchronous and Synchronous ELearning, EDUCAUSE Quarterly, 31(4), 2008http://www.aiaer.net/ejournal/Vol19207/24.Atasi_Madan.htm

14) Maclean-Blevins, A. & Muilenburg, L. (2013). Using Class Dojo to Support StudentSelf-regulation. In J. Herrington, A. Couros & V. Irvine (Eds.), Victoria, Canada: Association for the Advancement of Computingin Education (AACE).

15) Retrieved October, 2021 from https://www.learntechlib.org/primary/p/112192/.

16) Marsh, H.(1992), Extracurricular activities: Beneficial extension of the traditional curriculum or subversion of academic goal? Journal of Educational Psychology.

17) Mimirinis, M. & Bhattacharya, M. (2007). Design of virtual learning environments for deeplearning. Journal of Interactive Learning Research. 18 (1), pp.55-64.

18) Lai, C, & Zhu, W.& Gong, G. (2015) Understanding the quality of out-of-class English learning. TESOL Quarterly

19) Lyster, R. (2007). Learning and teaching languages through content. John BenjaminPublishing Company: Amestterdam

20) Nishanthi (2018). Important of learning English in today world. Retrieved October 2021 from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/329505353_Important_of_learning_English_in_today_world

21) Nadler, M.K.,&Nadler, L.B.(2001). The roles of sex, empathy, and credibility in out-of-class communication between faculty and students. Women’s Studies in Communication.

22) Oxfordlearning. Best methods of self-study for students. Retrieved October 2021 from https://www.oxfordlearning.com/best-methods-of-self-study-for-students/

23) Oxford royale academy. Four difficulties English poses for EFL Learners, and how to overcome them . Retrieved October 2021 from https://www.oxford-royale.com/articles/efl-difficulties/

24) Pearson, N. 2003. The idiosyncrasies of out-of-class language learning: A study of mainland Chinese students studying English at tertiary level in New Zealand. Paper presented at the meeting of The Independent Learning Conference, Melbourne, Australia,The Independent Learning Conference , Melbourne, Australia

25) Ozdamli, F. (2007). An evaluation of open-source learning management systems according to administration tools and curriculum design. The seventh international educational technology (IETC) conference. (May 2007). Nicosia: Turkish Republic of NorthernCyprus

26) Ur, P. 1996. A Course in Language Teaching: Practice and Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

27) Rao (2019) The importance of speaking skills in English classrooms. Retrieved October 2021 from

28) https://www.researchgate.net/publication/334283040_THE_IMPORTANCE_OF_SPEAKING_SKILLS_IN_ENGLISH_
CLASSROOMS

29) Richards, J.C. (2015). The changing face of language learning: Learning beyond the classroom. RELC Journal.

30) Runmei, Y. (2008). Interaction in EFL classes. Asian Social Science, CCSE.org, Retrieved October 2021 from

31) http://www.ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/ass/issue/view/58

32) Shomoossi, N. (2004). The effect of teacher’s questioning behavior on EFL classroom interaction: A classroom-based research. The Reading Matrix,4(2), .

33) Said, K. 2015. Students' Perceptions of Edmodo and Mobile Learning and their Real Barriers towardsthem. TOJET: The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, volume 14

34) Young, J., Gifford, J. and Lancaster, A. (2021) Effective virtual classrooms: an evidence review. London: Chartered Institute for Personnel and Development.

VOlUME 05 ISSUE 11 NOVEMBER 2022

Indexed In

Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar