Andar Beniala Lumbanraja

Master of Law Sebelas Maret University, Surakarta, Indonesia

DOI : https://doi.org/10.47191/ijsshr/v5-i12-20

Google Scholar Download Pdf
ABSTRACT

The aim of this study is to analyze the basic considerations of judges in deciding to acquit perpetrators of fraud or embezzlement (Case Study of Suoharjo District Court Decision Number: 194/Pid.B/2021/PN.Skh.). This research uses a normative juridical method. Normative legal research is studied based on rules or norms which are the basis for behaving according to the rules that apply in society which are considered appropriate and appropriate in the national legal system. That the basis for the judge's consideration was to acquit the perpetrators of the crime of fraud or embezzlement (Case Study of Sukoharjo District Court Decision Number: 194/Pid.B/2021/PN. Skh) is based on the provisions of Article 191 paragraph 1 which reads "If the court is of the opinion that from the results of the examination at the trial court the guilt of the actions charged against him has not been legally and convincingly proven, then he is acquitted". Where the subjective and objective elements in the Prosecutor's Indictment in Articles 378 or 372 are not legally and convincingly proven. Based on the provisions of Supreme Court Regulation No. 1, the case against the perpetrator should have been suspended, given the fact that there was an agreement that became the realm of civil law.

KEYWORDS:

Court Decision, Consideration of Judges, Justice, Freedom

REFERENCES

1) Dahlan, Sinaga. (2015). Kemandirian dan Kebebasan Hakim Memutus Perkara Pidana dalam Negara Hukum Pancasila.Jakarta: Nusamedia.

2) Leden, Marpaung. (1995) Putusan Bebas Masalah Dan Pemecahannya. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika.

3) Amirudin dan H. Zainal Asidikin. (2006). Pengantar Metode Penelitian Hukum. Jakarta: PT Raja Grafindo Persada.

4) Peter Mahmud Marzuki. (2010). Penelitian Hukum. Jakarta: Kencana Prenada Media.

5) Amiruddin dan H. Zainal Asikin. (2010). Pengantar Metode Penelian Hukum. Jakarta: Rajawali Pers.

6) Jhony Ibrahim. (2006). Teori dan Metodologi Penelitian Normatif. Surabaya: Banyumedia.

7) Lilik Mulyadi. (2007). Kompilasi Hukum Dalam Perspektif Teoritis Dan Praktek Pradilan. Bandung: Mandar Maju.

8) Carl Joachim Friedrich. (2004). Filsafat Hukum Perspektif Historis. Bandung: Nuansa dan Nusamedia.

9) Pasal 183 Undang-Undang Nomor 8 Tahun 1981 tentang Hukum Acara Pidana.

10) Pasal 50, Pasal 53 ayat (1 dan 2) Undang-Undang Nomor 48 Tahun 2009 tentang Kekuasaan Kehakiman.

11) Chapter183Law Number 8 of 1981 concerning Criminal Procedure Code.

12) Chapter50, Article 53 paragraph (1 and 2) of Law Number 48 of 2009 concerning Judicial Power.

VOlUME 05 ISSUE 12 DECEMBER 2022