VOlUME 05 ISSUE 02 FEBRUARY 2022
1Rasidar, 2Indah Sulisdiani, 3Elyta, 4Chainar, 5Akhmad Rifky Setya Anugrah
1,2,3,4,5Faculty of Social and Political Sciences, Universitas Tanjungpura
Google Scholar Download Pdf
ABSTRACT
Cases of forest and land fires have become a regular every year during the hot season. West Kalimantan is one of the places prone to forest fires. Geographically, West Kalimantan is largely covered with peat soil, which creates a significant risk of forest fires each year. Using a regional community model, local actors can have a rapid influence on policymaking. Forest fires in West Kalimantan are not a simple problem to solve. Special handlers, it is intended, would collaborate with many stakeholders, most notably the community. The method used in this study is a qualitative method with a literature study design and phenomenology. In qualitative research, the researcher should not influence the situation and social interaction between the researcher and the subject/informant being studied, even between the subjects being studied. The interactions between the individuals under study must occur in the context, not the technical researcher. The government strategies are already in place to address West Kalimantan''s development challenges. West Kalimantan''s development concerns have harmed the physical environment, notably decreased air quality caused by smoke density, which reduces vision. It obstructs transportation by altering the physicochemical and biological qualities of soil, altering the microclimate owing to plant loss, and even contributing to the greenhouse effect on a global scale. Several of the recommended actions for dealing with land fires and the impact of smoke for the prevention and control of land fires may be accomplished by revitalizing the KPA, including boosting community awareness, skills, and competence in fire prevention initiatives.
KEYWORDSGovernment, Forest Fires, West Kalimantan
REFERENCES
1) S. K. Uda, L. Hein, and D. Atmoko, “Assessing the health impacts of peatland fires: a case study for Central Kalimantan, Indonesia,” Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res., vol. 26, no. 30, pp. 31315–31327, 2019.
2) H. Batubara, “140 Titik Kebakaran Hutan Muncul di Kalbar: Penyebabnya Pembukaan Lahan Perkebunan,” news.detik.com, 2016. .
3) D. Prihatini, “600 Hektare Lahan Gambut di Kalimantan Barat Terbakar,” okezone.news, 2016. .
4) A. J. Glauber, S. Moyer, M. Adriani, and I. Gunawan, The cost of fire: An economic analysis of Indonesia’s 2015 fire crisis. World Bank, Jakarta, 2016.
5) S. Özokcu and Ö. Özdemir, “Economic growth, energy, and environmental Kuznets curve,” Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev., vol. 72, pp. 639–647, 2017.
6) Bisnis.com, “BNPB Pantau 150 Titik Api di Kalimantan Barat,” bisnis.com, 2017. [Online]. Available: https://kalimantan.bisnis.com/read/20170806/407/678567/bnpb-pantau-150-titik-api-di-kalimantan-barat.
7) [BNPB, “kebakaran hutan dan lahan terus berlanjut di Kalimantan barat 150 hotspot terdetected,” BNPB.go.id, 2017. .
8) Y. K. Irawan, “Jumlah Titik Api di Kalbar Meningkat Jadi 914 ‘Hotspot,’” Kompas.com, 2018. .
9) W. Kartikasari and Elyta, “West Kalimantan border: How tough is it to deal with the Covid-19 pandemic? | Frontera de Kalimantan Occidental: ¿Qué tan difícil es lidiar con la pandemia de Covid-19?,” Sociol. y Tecnociencia, vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 134–159, 2021.
10) B. Buzan, “An Introduction to Strategic Studies,” An Introd. to Strateg. Stud., 1987.
11) M. Di Gregorio et al., “Multi-level governance and power in climate change policy networks,” Glob. Environ. Chang., vol. 54, pp. 64–77, 2019.
12) Elyta, Martoyo, and Herlan, “Formulation Model of Power Based Technopreneurship in the Digital Technology Era,” Int. J. Advenced Sci. Eng. Inf. Technol., vol. 11, no. 6, 2021.
13) Elyta and Martoyo, “Public Policy and Indonesian Diplomacy for the Acceleration of International Goods Terminal Development,” Proc. Int. Conf. Ind. Eng. Oper. Manag., pp. 2573–2582, 2021.
14) K. G. Austin, A. Schwantes, Y. Gu, and P. S. Kasibhatla, “What causes deforestation in Indonesia?,” Environ. Res. Lett., vol. 14, no. 2, p. 24007, Feb. 2019.
15) USATODAY, “EPA: Half of USA Breathing Illegal Levels of Smog,” usatoday.com, 2004. .
16) E. Elyta and A. Sahide, “model of creative industry management in border areas to improve bilateral cooperation In Indonesia and Malaysia,” Cogent Soc. Sci., vol. 7, no. 1, 2021.
17) Elyta, A. Razak, I. Rahman, Y. Fahruna, and F. D. Nailufar, “Model of Strengthening Economic Security Through the Implementation of Management Accounting for Small and Medium Business in Borders of States,” Acad. Strateg. Manag. J., vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 1–11, 2021.
18) S. A. K. Sari, “Transboundary Pollution from Forest Fires: A Perspective from Ecology and International Environmental Law,” Repos. USU, 2008.
19) Martoyo and Elyta, “Model of Human Security-Based Policy of Business Increase Income Prosperous Family Indonesia,” Rev. Int. Geogr. Educ. Online, vol. 11, no. 6, pp. 855–865, 2021.
20) C. Barr, A. Dermawan, H. Purnomo, and H. Komarudin, Financial governance and Indonesia’s Reforestation Fund during the Soeharto and post-Soeharto periods, 1989-2009: A political economic analysis of lessons for REDD+. 2010.
21) E. Elyta and D. Darmawan, “Education politics: Learning model through Google Apps in office administration management of diploma students,” Cypriot J. Educ. Sci., vol. 16, no. 5, pp. 2152–2160, 2021.
22) C. J. P. Colfer, Which way forward?: people, forests, and policymaking in Indonesia. Washington, DC, 2002.