FEBRUARY 2022

VOlUME 05 ISSUE 02 FEBRUARY 2022
The Impact of Learner Agency and Self-Regulated Learning in Efl Classes
1Mahbuba Rasulova, 2Kevin Ottoson
1Tashkent State University of Law
2Nagoya Women’s University
DOI : https://doi.org/10.47191/ijsshr/v5-i2-44

Google Scholar Download Pdf
ABSTRACT

Learners have a sense of “agency” when they feel they can influence the events and feel in control of different things occurring around them. This is an important sense for learners, making them more active participants in their learning. Every decision a learner makes, and action she or he takes, will impact the thinking, behavior or decisions of others. When learners can control their own learning, they exercise self-regulated learning (SRL), which is crucial in becoming a lifelong learner. McIenrney (2008) described SRL as “self-generated thoughts, feelings, and actions in order to attain educational goals” (p. 374). This study focuses on case studies of three English language learners at a language school in Tashkent, Uzbekistan. Case study data were generated through a series of six in-depth, informal interviews conducted in English over four months. Triangulated data revealed a bond between learner agency and self-regulated learning as more agentic learners tend to use different kinds of self-regulated strategies. In contrast, less agentic ones appear more passive when it comes to employing self-regulating strategies in their learning process. Finally, suggestions to facilitate learner agency and self-regulated learning in the language-learning classroom are provided.

KEYWORDS

Agency Self-regulation Motivation Self-discipline

REFERENCES

1) Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Prentice Hall.

2) Barton, A.C., & Tan, E. (2010). We be burnin’! Agency, identity, and science learning. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 19(2), 187-229

3) Biesta, G., & Tedder, M. (2007). Agency and learning in the lifecourse: Towards an ecological perspective. Studies in the Education of Adults, 39, 132–149.

4) Charmaz, K. 2006. Constructing grounded theory. Sage.

5) Creswell, J. W. (2013) Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (3rd ed.). Sage.

6) Mahbuba, R. (2022). THE ROLE OF STUDENT-STUDENT INTERACTION IN EFL CLASSROOMS. Eurasian Journal of Social Sciences, Philosophy and Culture, 2(2), 63-66.

7) Deleuze, G. (2004). Difference and repetition. Continuum Publishing Group.

8) Emirbayer, M., & Mische, A. (1998). What is agency? American Journal of Sociology, 103, 962–1023.

9) Ellis, N. C. (2019). Essentials of a theory of language cognition. Modern Language Journal, 103 (Supplement 2019), 39-60.

10) Gao, X (2021, December 10). An Introduction to Learner Agency. Oxford University Press ELT. https://oupeltglobalblog.com/2021/12/10/introduction-learner-agency/

11) Hartley, K., & Bendixen, L. D. (2001). Educational research in the Internet age: examining the role of individual characteristics. Educational Researcher, 30 (9): 22-26.

12) Kelso, J. S. (2016). On the self-organizing origins of agency. Trends in Cognitive Science, 20, 490−499.

13) Mahbuba, R. (2022). THE ROLE OF STUDENT-STUDENT INTERACTION IN EFL CLASSROOMS. Eurasian Journal of Social Sciences, Philosophy and Culture, 2(2), 63-66.

14) Lantolf, J. P., & Thorne, S. (2006). Socioculturaltheoryand the genesis of second language development. Oxford University Press.

15) Larsen-Freeman, D. (2019). On a language learner agency: A complex dynamic systems theory perspective. The Modern Language Journal, 103, 62-79.

16) McInerney, D. M. (2012). The motivational roles of cultural differences and cultural identity in self-regulated learning. In D. H. Schunk, & B. J. Zimmerman (Eds.), Motivation and Self-regulated Learning. Theory, Research, and Applications (3rd ed). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

17) Mercer, S. (2011a). Understanding learner agency as a complex dynamic system. System 39(4), 427-436.

18) Mahbuba, R. (2022). IMPLICATING TASK-BASED LEARNING IN TEACHING LEGAL ENGLISH. Eurasian Journal of Social Sciences, Philosophy and Culture, 2(2), 55-62.

19) Mercer, S. (2012). The complexity of learner agency. Apples-Journal of Applied Language Studies, 6(2), 41-59.

20) Miller, E. R. (2014). The language of adult immigrants: Agency in the making. Multilingual Matters.

21) Miller, E. R. (2016). The ideology of learner agency and the neoliberal self. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 26, 348–365.

22) Rasulova, M. (2021). Examining learner agency of first-year English majors in Japanese university online EFL classes. 南山言語科学=Nanzan studies in language science (16), 1-26.

23) Rainio, A.P. (2008). From resistance to involvement: Examining agency and control in a playworld activity. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 15(2), 115-140.

24) Schunk, D. H. (2001). Self-regulation through goal setting. ERIC Clearninghouse on Counseling and Student Service, University of North Carolina at Greensboro.

25) Mahbuba, R. (2022). THE ROLE OF STUDENT-STUDENT INTERACTION IN EFL CLASSROOMS. Eurasian Journal of Social Sciences, Philosophy and Culture, 2(2), 63-66.

26) Shirkhani, S. & Ghaemi, F. (2011). Barriers to self-regulation of learning: Drawing on Bandura’s ideas. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 29, 107-110.

27) Van Lier, L. (2008). Agency in the classroom. In J. P. Lantolf, & M.E. Poehner (Eds.), Sociocultural theory and the teaching of second languages. Equinox.

28) Winne, P. H., & Hadwin, A. F. (2008). The weave of motivation and self- regulated learning. In D. H. Schunk, & B. J. Zimmerman (Eds), Motivation and Self-regulated Learning. Theory, Research, and Applications. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

29) Mahbuba, R. (2022). IMPLICATING TASK-BASED LEARNING IN TEACHING LEGAL ENGLISH. Eurasian Journal of Social Sciences, Philosophy and Culture, 2(2), 55-62.

30) Zhang, J. (2013). Learner agency, motive, and self-regulated learning in an online ESL writing class. IALLT Journal of Language Learning Technologies, 43(2), 58-81.

31) Zimmerman, B. J. (2001). Theories of self-regulated learning and academic achievement: An overview and analysis. In B. J. Zimmerman, & D. H. Schunk (Eds.), Self-regulated Learning and Academic Achievement. Theoretical Perspectives. Erlbaum.

32) Zimmerman, B. J. (2008). Investigating self-regulation and motivation: Historical background, methodological developments, and future prospects. American Educational Research Journal, 45, 166-183.

33) Rasulova, M. (2021). Examining learner agency of first-year English majors in Japanese university online EFL classes. 南山言語科学= Nanzan studies in language science, (16), 1-26.

VOlUME 05 ISSUE 02 FEBRUARY 2022

Indexed In

Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar