Dildora Ganieva

PhD, Doctoral student of Andijan State University

DOI : https://doi.org/10.47191/ijsshr/v5-i3-43

Google Scholar Download Pdf
Abstract

This research aims at studying syncretic properties of participles, and exploring their polyfunctional realization. It is a comparative study of participles in Uzbek and English languages, that belong to different language families, the Altaic and the Indo-European correspondingly, and perhaps, therefore, the studied units in Uzbek are contextually oriented, and in English, they are inherently oriented. The research employs a qualitative method using comparative and componential analyses. The samples in the study are taken from written sources. The findings of the research proves that participles, as being non-finite forms of the verb and therefore considered syncretic units, perform various functions depending on the context they occur. This polyfunctional realization is characteristic to the both languages, although, several functions of participles in the one language are different from participles in the other language.

KEYWORDS:

Syncretism, Polyfunctional, Non-Finite, Deranked, A Participle, A Converb, An Absolute Tense, A Relative Tense, A Present Participle, A Past Participle, A Future Participle.

REFERENCES:

1) Crystal D. A Dictionary of Linguistics and Phonetics. Oxford: Blackwell Publlishing, 2008. (fifth edition) 508 p.

2) Comrie, B., Thompson, S. Lexical Nominalization. 2007. at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/286628461

3) Dobroradnykh, T. “The cognitive discursive aspect of realization of polyfunctional linguistic units in the mass media (on the material of the gerund)”. Research Result. Theoretical and Applied Linguistics, 2018. Volume 4, Issue 4. P.20-28.

4) Fox, B. “The Discourse Function of the Participle in Ancient Greek”. Discourse Perspectives on Syntax. New York: Academic Press, 1983. P. 23-41.

5) Ganieva, D. “Asymmetric Relationship between a Signifier and a Signified of a Converb with the Ending -ib”. (in Russian). Issues of Philological Sciences. Moscow, Volume 2, 2011. P.96-97.

6) Ganieva, D. “On Syncretism and Collateral Phenomena”. Education of Language and Literature. Tashkent, Volume 4, 2018. P.24-26.

7) Ganieva, D. “Semantic Syncretism and Polyfunctionality”. (in Uzbek). Scientific Bulletin of Namangan State University. Namangan, Volume 6, 2019. P.275-278.

8) Ganieva, Sh. “Phraseological Meaning and its Structure”. The Way of Science. Volgograd, Volume 11, 2016. P.40-42

9) Giniyatullina A Y, Garaeva M R, Bushkanets L E, Timerhanov A A, Khanipova I, Khairutdinov R R, Ibragimov G. “Morphological and syntactical features of adjectives in English and Tatar participles”. Journal of Fundamental and Applied Sciences, 2017, Volume 9(7S). P.1277-1285.

10) Gvishiani, N. Polyfunctional Words in Language and Speech. (in Russian). Moscow: Vysshaya shkola, 1979. 200 p.

11) Haspelmath, M. “Passive Participles across Languages”. Typological Studies in Language. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company, 1994. Volume 27. P.151-178.

12) Hojiev, A. The Verb. (in Uzbek), Tashkent: Fan, 1973. 192 p.

13) Iskandarova, Sh., Ashurov, D. “Linguculturological Analysis of "Head" stem Phrasemas”. JournalNX, 2020. Volume 6, Issue 12. P.378-383.

14) Kabanova, A. Non-Finite Forms of the Verb in the Modern Romanian Language (in Russian). Synopsis of the PD dissertation. Moscow, 2011. 18 p.

15) Konig, E., Van der Auwera, J. “Adverbial Participles, Gerunds and Absolute constructions in the Languages of Europe”. Toward a Typology of European Languages. 1990

16) Mengliev, B. Semantic Properties and Syntactic Opportunities of Morphological Means (in Uzbek). Synopsis of the PD dissertation. Tashkent, 1996. 19 p.

17) Minca, N. “The –ing participle and the gerund: peculiarities and context differences”. https://www.diacronia.ro/ro/indexing/details/A24017/pdf

18) Mingazova, N., Subich, V., Zakirov, R., Ali Al-foadi, R. “Participles in english and arabic: structural and functional approaches”. Revista Publicando, 2018. Volume 5, Issue 17. P.270-277.

19) Mirzaev, M., Usmonov, S., Rasulov, I. The Uzbek Language. (in Uzbek). Tashkent, Ukituvchi: 1962.

20) Quirk, R; Greenbaum, S; Leech, G.; Svartvik, J. A Grammar of Contemporary English. Longman, 1972. 1120 p.

21) Rahmatullaev, Sh. The Contemporary Literary Uzbek Language. (in Uzbek). Tashkent: Mumtoz suz, 2010. 298 p.

22) Reformatskiy, A. Introduction to Linguistics. (in Russian). Moscow: AspectPress, 1996. 536 p.

23) Shagal, K. Towards a Typology of Participles. Academic Dissertation. Helsinki, 2017. 264 p.

24) Shapa, L., Mardarenko, H. “Semantical Shift in Attributive Participles in Sublanguages of Science and Engineering (on the Basis of the English Electrical Engineering Sublanguages)” (in Russian). Proceedings of Odessa Polytechnic University, 2009, Volume. 1(33) – 2(34). P.298-302.

25) The Russian encyclopaedic linguistic dictionary. (in Russian). Moscow: Sovetskaya Encyclopedia, 1990. 688 p.

26) https://glossary.sil.org/term/participle

27) https://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/condemned

28) https://www.thoughtco.com/past-participle-1691592

VOlUME 05 ISSUE 03 MARCH 2022