VOlUME 05 ISSUE 05 MAY 2022
1Arfan Nusi, 2Nurul Ilmi Idrus, 3Hamka Naping, 4Lahaji
1,2Department of Philosophy, Islamic State University of Sultan Amai Gorontalo, Indonesia
3,4Department of Anthropology, Hasanuddin University, Makassar, Indonesia
Google Scholar Download Pdf
ABSTRACT
Nahdlatul Ulama and Muhammadiyah have responded to the local reality of Gorontalo by new approaches of post-traditionalism and neo-modernism. The present article delves to explore the landscape of local Muslim community in Gorontalo within the discourse of Nahdlatul Ulama and Muhammadiyah; it also aims to investigate the model of post-traditionalist Nahdlatul Ulama and neo-modernist Muhammadiyah thoughts in understanding Islam and Gorontalo culture. The study employed a qualitative method that relies on primary and secondary data. Informants from the two Islamic organizations, Nahdlatul Ulama and Muhammadiyah, were involved within this study. Prior to the data analysis, the primary and secondary data were classified.The results of this study signified two points of concern: 1) the Muslim community in Gorontalo consists of Nahdlatul Ulama and Muhammadiyah affiliations. The two organizations have a harmonious relationship; both organizations understand and respect each other. Some of the jama’ah (follower/member) of one organization even practice the religious traditions of the other organization. 2) Nahdlatul Ulama stands on the ground of traditional school of thoughts that are responsive to the modernization, while Muhammadiyah bases its foundation on the modern thoughts that accommodate local traditions. The results further emphasized that the difference of perspective between both organizations lies around the thoughts, while the deconstruction of religious missions remain the same between both organizations. Each organization tends to stand firm on their own ideology as what originally proposed when the organization was first established.
KEYWORDS:Post-traditionalist Nahdlatul Ulama, Neo-modernist Muhammadiyah, School of Thought.
REFERENCES
1) Aminuddin, L. H. 2018. Rekonstruksi Wacana Modernis-Tradisionalis: Kajian Atas Pemikiran Keislaman Muhammadiyah dan Nahdlatul Ulama Pasca Reformasi [Reconstruction of Modernist-Traditionalist Discourse: A Study on Islamic Thoughts of Muhammadiyah and Nahdlatul Ulama Post-Reformation]` Jurnal Kodifikasia, 12, 93-112
2) Noer, D. 1973. The Modernist Muslim Movement in Indonesia 1900-1942. Oxford University Press.
3) Arroisi, J. 2020. Perdana, Martin Putra, Al Faruqi, Achmad Reza Hutama, Pembaharuan Pemikiran Islam Model Muhammadiyah dan Nahdlatul Ulama [Reformation of Islamic Thought Models of Muhammadiyah and Nahdlatul Ulama]. Jurnal Islam Nusantara, Vol. 4(2), 182-188.
4) Wododo, S. A. 2011. Konstruksi Keilmuan Muhammadiyah dan Nahdlatul Ulama [Scientific Construction of Muhammadiyah and Nahdlatul Ulama]. Jurnal Al-Ulum, Vol. 11(2), 205-238.
5) Abidin, Z. 2015. Menapaki Distingsi Geneologis Pemikiran Pendidikan (Nahdlatul Ulama dan Muhammadiyah) [Exploring the Genealogical Distinction of Educational Thought (Nahdlatul Ulama and Muhammadiyah)]. Jurnal Nizham, Vol, 4(2), 53-70.
6) Lubis, A. 1993. Pemikiran Muhammadiyah dan Muhammad Abduh [Thoughts of Muhammadiyah and Muhammad Abduh]. Jakarta: Bulan Bintang.
7) Azhar, M. 2001. Fiqh Peradaban [Fiqh of Civilization]. Yogyakarta: Ittaqa Press.
8) Hilmi, M. 2012. Quo-Vadis Islam Moderat Indonesia? Menimbang Kembali Modernisme Nahdlatul Ulama dan Muhammadiyah [Quo-Vadis, Indonesian Moderate Islam? Reconsidering the Modernism of Nahdlatul Ulama and Muhammadiyah]. Jurnal Moqot, Vol. 34(2), 262-281.
9) Fithriyyah, M. U. and Umam, M. S. 2018. Quo Vadis Ormas Islam Moderat Indonesia? Peneropong Peran NU dan Muhammadiyah di Era Revolusi Industri 4.0 [Quo Vadis of Indonesian Moderate Islamic Organizations? Observing the Role of NU and Muhammadiyah in the Industrial Revolution Era 4.0]. Jurnal Pemikiran Politik Islam, Vol. 1(1), 15-27.
10) Rumadi, Dkk. 2003. Post-Tradisionalisme Islam: Wacana Intelektualisme dalam Komunitas NU [Islamic Post-Traditionalism: Discourse on Intellectualism in the NU Community]. Jurnal Istiqro’, Vol. 2(1), 200-227.
11) Muhammad, F. 2015. Dinamika Pemikiran dan Gerakan Politik Nahdlatul Ulama [The Dynamics of Thought and Political Movement of Nahdlatul Ulama]. Jurnal Studi Agama dan Pemikiran Islam, Vol. 9(1), 57-75.
12) Mulkhan, A. M. 2021. Harmonisasi Islam dan tradisi Lokal Dalam Kehidupan Warga Muhammadiyah di Pedesaan [Harmonization of Islam and Local Traditions in the Life of Muhammadiyah Residents in Rural Areas]. Jurnal Ma’arif, Vol, 16(2), 15-41.
13) Fuad, A. N. 2015. Dari Reformis Hingga Transformatif: Dialektika Intelektual Keagamaan Muhammadiyah [From Reformist to Transformative: Muhammadiyah's Religious Intellectual Dialectic]. Malang: Intrans Publishing.
14) Payu, B. R. 2010. Analisis Kondisi Kemiskinan Absolut Provinsi Absolut [Analysis of Absolute Poverty Conditions in Absolute Province]. Pelangi Ilmu, 3(4), 42-58.
15) Mardison, S. 2013. Konformitas Teman Sebaya Sebagai Pembentuk Perilaku Individu [Peer Conformity as a Shaper of Individual Behavior]. Jurnal Al-Taujih, Vol. 2(1), 78-90.
16) Dachlan, M. 2017. Nahdlatul Ulama dan Interaksi Antar Kelompok Keagamaan di Kota Gorontalo [Nahdlatul Ulama and Interaction Between Religious Organizations in Gorontalo]. Jurnal Penelitian Keagamaan dan Kemasyarakatan, Vol. 30(3), 281-298.
17) Ismail, F. 2020. Nu, Moderatisme, dan Pluralisme. Yogyakarta: Ircisod.