VOlUME 05 ISSUE 06 JUNE 2022
1Mahayu Yustisia Kartika Dewi, 2A. Tulus Sartono
1,2Master of Law Program, Faculty of Law, Universitas Diponegoro
Google Scholar Download Pdf
ABSTRACT
KSP Multidana went bankrupt or disbanded, but the members’ rights who had not yet fulfilled all of the funds were returned by the cooperative, while the members who borrowed themselves had not fully returned the money borrowed by the members to date. This study aims to determine the legal consequences of the bankruptcy decision of KSP Multidana through the Semarang Commercial Court Decision Number 09/Pdt.Sus-Pailit/2017/PN.Niaga SMg jo 12/PDT.SUS-PKPU/2016/PN.
Niaga.Smg for the depositor of funds, the position of the depositor as a result of the bankruptcy of the Multidana Savings and Loans Cooperative (KSP), and the settlement process in the bankruptcy of the Multidana Savings and Loans Cooperative (KSP). The method used in this article is an empirical juridical approach. The results of this study indicate the legal consequences of the bankruptcy decision of KSP Multidana through the Semarang Commercial Court Decision Number 09/Pdt.Sus-Pailit/2017/PN.Niaga SMg jo 12/PDT.SUS-PKPU/2016/PN.Niaga.Smg for member depositing funds is a member depositing funds unable to withdraw their deposit funds due to a general confiscation. The position of the depositors as a result of the bankruptcy of the Multidana Savings and Loans Cooperative (KSP) is the same (creditorium parity) as concurrent creditors as stipulated in Article 1131 of the Civil Code, and therefore they have the same rights over the results of the execution of the bankrupt bank according to the number of their respective bills.
KEYWORDS:cooperative, bankruptcy, members, savings, depositors.
REFERENCES
1) Andraini, F. (2018). ASPEK HUKUM KEPAILITAN KOPERASI (STUDI KASUS PUTUSAN NOMOR 35/Pdt.Sus-PKPU/2015/PN.NIAGA.JKT.P). Dinamika Hukum, 18(1), 87–114.
2) Anoraga, P., and Widiyanti, N. (2017). Dinamika Koperasi. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.
3) Chairanie, R., and Afriana, A. (2021). KEDUDUKAN ANGGOTA KOPERASI SIMPAN PINJAM SEBAGAI KREDITOR PADA KOPERASI SIMPAN KOPERASI PANDAWA MANDIRI GROUP YANG TELAH DINYATAKAN PAILIT ATAS DISITANYA BOEDEL PAILIT OLEH NEGARA. Panji Keadilan, 4(1), 1–18.
4) Hartini, R. (2007). Hukum Kepailitan. Malang: UMM.
5) Lontoh, R. (2011). Penyelesaian Utang Melalui Pailit atau Penundaan Kewajiban Pembayaran Utang. Bandung: Alumni.
6) Nating, I. (2005). Peranan dan Tanggung Jawab Kurator Dalam Pengurusan dan Pemberesan Harta Pailit. Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada.
7) Prodjohamidjojo, M. (2009). Proses Kepailitan Menurut Peraturan Pememrintah Pengganti Undang-undang Nomor 1 Tahun 1998 tentang Perubahan Atas Undang-undang Tentang Kepailitan. Bandung: Mandar Maju.
8) Rahardjo, S. (2003). Sisi-sisi Lain dari Hukum di Indonesia. Jakarta: Kompas.
9) Rato, D. (2010). Filsafat Hukum Mencari: Memahami dan Memahami Hukum. Yogyakarta: Laksbang Pressindo.
10) Sjahdemi, S. R. (1998). Hukum Kepailitan Memahami Faillisementsverordening jo Undang-Undang Nomor 4 Tahun 1998. Jakarta: Pustaka Utama Grafiti.
11) Soekanto, S. (2007). Pengantar Penelitian Hukum. Jakarta: Universitas Indonesia Press.
12) Soekanto, S., and Mamudji, S. (2012). Penelitian Hukum Normatif. Jakarta: PT. Rajagrafindo Persada.
13) Soemitro, R. H. (1990). Metodologi Penelitian Hukum dan Jurimetri. Jakarta: Ghalia Indonesia.
14) Soeroso. (2013). Pengantar Ilmu Hukum. Bandung: Bumi Aksara.
15) Subekti. (2014). Aneka Perjanjian. Jakarta: P.T. Citra Aditya Bakti.
16) Suharto, R. (2019). Karakteristik Kepailitan Badan Hukum Koperasi. Lex Journal: Kajian Hukum & Keadilan, 3(1). https://doi.org/10.25139/lex.v3i1.1816
17) Suyudi, A., Nugroho, E., and Nurbyanti, H. S. (2014). Analisis Hukum Pailitan Indonesia,Kepailitan Di Indonesia. Jakarta: Pusat studi Hukum dan Kebijakan Indonesia.