June 2022

VOlUME 05 ISSUE 06 JUNE 2022
Character Education Management (A Multi-Site Study at Madrasah Darussalam Awayan Madrasah and Miftahul Ulum Pudak Madrasah, Balangan Regency)
1Tajudin Noor, 2Rustam Effendi, 3Suhaimi
1,2,3Master of Educational Administration Program, Lambung Mangkurat University, Banjarmasin 70123, Indonesia
DOI : https://doi.org/10.47191/ijsshr/v5-i6-112

Google Scholar Download Pdf
ABSTRACT:

The goal of this study is to discuss the management of character education at two different sites. The study was qualitative and multi-site. The researchers served as the research instruments. Interviews, participant observations, and documentation were utilized to collect data. Snowball sampling tactics were employed by respondents to select important informants. Model interactive analysis was used to analyze the data. Character education management, which covers planning or emphasizing difficulties (4 things), research aims (4 items), research benefits (2 items), and term definition, was collected via a guide interview, observation, and recording (4 items). Data analysis techniques using models (Bagdon, Robert C, 1982). The researchers' involvement, the persistence of observations, and the appropriateness of referential were all utilized to determine the validity of the data. The results of the study showed that the management of Private Ibtidaiyah Madrasa of Darussalam Awayan character education and the management of Private Ibtidaiyah Madrasa of Miftahul Ulum Pudak character education is in accordance with existing management functions and character-building strategies.

KEYWORDS:

Management, Character Education

REFERENCES

1) Agustina, D. (2019). correlation between the Principal Role, Motivation and Satisfaction with the Performance of Elementary School Teachers. Journal of K6, Education, and Management(J-K6EM)., 2(2), 87–96.

2) Bafadal. (2016). Peningkatan Profesionalisme Guru Sekolah Dasar. Bumi Aksara.

3) Bagdon, Robert C, dan B. K. S. (1982). Qualitative Research for Education an Introduction ti Theory and Method. Allyn and Bacon.

4) Barlian, I. (2013). Manajemen Berbasis Sekolah (Menuju Sekolah Berprestasi). Erlangga.

5) Bass, R. (2006). Transformational Leadership. Lawrance Erlbaum Associates, Inc.

6) Benjamin, Fauth, E. a. (2019). The effects of teacher competence on student outcomes in elementary science education: The mediating role of teaching quality. Teaching and Teacher Education, 86.

7) Bozkus, K, D. (2018). The Role of Organizational Trust in the Effect of Leadership of School Administrators on Job Satisfaction of Teachers. Pegem Akademi Kuram ve Uygulamada Eğitim Yönetimi, 437–482.

8) Darwito. (2016). Prilaku dalam Organisasi. Terjemah Agus Dharma. Erlangga.

9) Dessler, G. (2015). Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia. Salemba Empat.

10) Fatmawati, Bafadal, S. (2018). Komunikasi Kepala Sekolah Dengan Warga Sekolah Untuk Mewujudkan Visi Dan Misi Sekolah. Jurnal Administrasi Dan Manajemen Pendidikan, 1(2).

11) Fitriana, N., R., Handayaningrum, W., Roesminingsih, V., M. (2021). Strategi Kepala Sekolah Dalam Peningkatan Mutu Akademik Dan Non Akademik Peserta Didik. Jurnal Ilmiah Mandala Education, 7(4).

12) Hairudinor. (2018). Pengaruh Gaya Kepemimpinan Situasional dan Iklim Organisasi terhadap Kinerja Karyawan dengan Kepuasan Kerja sebagai Variabel Intervening (Studi pada PT. Bank Kalteng Cabang Puruk Cahu). Bisnis Dan Pembangunan, 7(1).

13) Hamdani, Y., D. (2020). Kepemimpinan Kepala Sekolah Ideal. EduPsyCouns. Journal of Education, Psychology and Counseling, 2(1).

14) Hasibuan, M. S. . (2014). Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia. Bumi Aksara.

15) Herdiana, H. (2017). Pengaruh Kepemimpinan Situasional dan Iklim Organisasi terhadap Prestasi Kerja Karyawan di Kantor BPJS Ketenagakerjaan Tasikmalaya. Jurnal Ekonomi Manajemen., 3(2).

16) Kurniasih. (2017). Pendidikan Karakter: Internalisasi Dan Metode Pembelajaran Di Sekolah. Kata Pena. Laksana.

17) Lethwood, K. (2018). The Effects of Transformational Leadership on Organizational Conditions and Student Engagement With School. Ontario Institute For Studies In Education.

18) Miles, M. B. and A. M. H. (2005). Qualitative Data Analysis. UI-Press.

19) Muchtar D., S. A. (2019). Pendidikan Karakter Menurut Kemendikbud. Edumaspul: Jurnal Pendidikan.

20) Sujarweni, V., W. (2014). Metode Penelitian: Lengkap, Praktis dan Mudah dipahami. Pustaka Baru Press.

21) Taufik. (2014). Pendidikan Karakter Di Sekolah: Pemahaman, Metode Penerapan, Dan Peranan Tiga Elemen. Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan. Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta, 59–65.

22) Tioktowati, D., Suryana, A., Prihatin, E. (2020). Strategi Foresight Leadership Kepala Sekolah Dalam Pelaksanaan Pendidikan Karakter Jabar Masagi. Jurnal Tata Kelola Pendidikan, 2(1).

23) Warni, Rovita Eva, Aslamiah, dan A. M. R. (2021). correlation of Transformational Leadership, Work Culture and Job Satisfaction with Teacher Performance. Journal of K6 Education and Management (JK6EM) 4(2).

24) Wijaya, C dan Rusyan, T. . (2014). Kemampuan Dasar Guru dalam Proses Belajar Mengajar. Remaja Rosdakarya.

25) Winardi. (2014). Motivasi dan Permotivasian dalam Manajemen Pendidikan. Raja Grafindo Persada.

26) Wote, Alice Yeni Verawati, dan J. S. P. (2019). Pengaruh Gaya Kepemimpinan Transformasional dan Kepuasan Kerja terhadap Kinerja Guru Sekolah Dasar. Jurnal Ilmiah Sekolah Dasar 3(4).

27) Wulan, S. (2013). Hubungan Disiplin dengan Kinerja Guru SMA Negeri di Tiga Kecamatan Kota Depok. Jurnal Ilmiah WIDYA, 141–147.

28) Zuriah, N. (2007). Pendidikan Moral dan Budi Pekerti Dalam perspektif Perubahan. Bumi Aksara.

VOlUME 05 ISSUE 06 JUNE 2022

Indexed In

Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar