VOlUME 05 ISSUE 06 JUNE 2022
1Leah Wambui Kamau, 2Dr. Anashia Nancy Ong’onda
1School of Social Sciences, Department of Languages and Humanities, Mount Kenya University, Kenya
2School of Humanities and Social sciences, Senior Lecturer, Department of Languages and Linguistics, Machakos University, Kenya
Google Scholar Download Pdf
ABSTRACT:
The rapid spread of mobile messaging applications like WhatsApp has its impact on generating special linguistic features archetypal for this type of Computer Mediated Discourse. This study investigates Whatsapp digital language from a discourse analysis approach. The study aims at analyzing the linguistic features and the functions of WhatsApp language among undergraduate students in Mount Kenya University. The study employed a descriptive research design that utilized qualitative research methods. The study employed Computer Mediated Discourse analysis framework. The findings of the study revealed that The findings of the study revealed that linguistic features of WhatsApp digital language are characterized by the use of casual speech and a netlingo among undergraduate students. Linguistic features were reflected in terms of contractions, phonetic spellings, abbreviations, regiolectal contractions, emoticons/Emojis and Punctuation Marks. The data examined revealed that language plays a key role in social media as it is the form of communication. The data revealed the following functions of language: phatic function of language for social connection, Interactional function of language for friendship maintenance, Informational function of language, directive function of language and multlingual function of language. The study recommends that that educators should reconsider how they respond to this new form of writing since the study shows how students are using WhatsApp digital language for academic purposes. The study adds knowledge to linguistics, Computer Mediated Discourse and language and communication.
KEYWORDS:Whatsapp digital language, Computer Mediated Communication, Computer Mediated Discourse, Undergratuate Students.
REFERENCES
1) Adika, O. (2014, March 5). news. Retrieved September 6, 2016, from techweez: http://www.techweez.com/2014/03/05/49-of-kenyans-mobile-users-on-whatsapp/
2) Androutsopoulos, J. K. (2000). Non-standard spellings in media texts: the case of German fanzines. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 4(4), 514–533. doi: 101111/1467-9481.00128. Retrieved from
shttps://jannisandroutsopoulos.files.wordpress.com/2009/12/jos_4-4_fanzines.pdf
3) Al-Shishtawi, H. (2019). Analyzing the Discourse of WhatsApp's Status. International Journal of Language and Linguistics Vol. 6, No. 3, 19-23.
4) Ayan, Erdal (2020). Descriptive Analysis of Emoticons/Emoji and Persuasive Digital Language Use in WhatsApp Messages. Journal of language and linguistics. Vol. 10(4): 72-93.
5) Baron, N. (2008). Always On. Language in an Online and Mobile World. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
6) Baron, N. (2013). Do mobile technologies reshape speaking, writing, or reading?. Mobile Media & Communication, (1)1, 134-140.
7) Bieswanger, M. (2007). 2 abbrevi8 or not 2 abbrevi8: A contrastive analysis of different shortening strategies in English and German text messages. Texas Linguistics Forum, 50.
Retrieved from http://didattica.uniroma2.it/assets/uploads/corsi/39543/smsgermanenglish.pdf
8) Church , K., & de Oliveira, R. (2013). What's up with whatsapp?: comparing mobile instant messaging behaviors with traditional SMS. Proceedings of the 15th international conference on Human-computer interaction with mobile devices and services. (pp. 352-361). ACM.
9) Creswell, J. W. (2012). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among the five traditions (3 rd ed.). California: Thousand Oaks.
10) Crystal, D. (2001). Language and the internet. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
11) Crystal, D. (2008). Txtng: The gr8 db8. Oxford:Oxford University Press.
12) December, J. (1996). Units of analysis for Internet communication. Journal of Computer-mediated Communication, vol. 1, no. 4.
13) December, J. (1997). Notes on defining of computer-mediated communication. CMC Magazine. Available: https://www.december.com /cmc/mag/1997/jan/december.html.
14) Dredge, S. (2014). Why is WhatsApp worth up to $19bn to Facebook?” The Guardian, 20, February.
15) Groupe Spéciale Mobile Association (2016). The mobile economy: Africa 2016. GSMA Association. Retrieved Sep 12, 2016, from https://www.gsmaintelligence.com/research/?file=3bc21ea879a5b217b64d62fa24c55bdf&download
16) Halliday, M.A.K. (2002). Linguistic studies of text and discourse. London: Continuum International Publishing.
17) Herring, S. C. (1996). Posting in a different voice: Gender and ethics in computer mediated communication. In C. ESS (Ed.), Philosophical perspectives on computer mediated communication (115-145). Albany, NY: SUNY Press.
18) Herring, S. C. (2001). Computer-mediated discourse," in Handbook of discourse analysis, D. Tannen, Schiffrin, D., Hamilton, H. , Ed. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers, 2001, pp. 612-634.
19) Herring, S. C. (2004). Computer-mediated discourse analysis: An approach to researching online behavior. In S. A. Barab, R. Kling, & J. Gray (Eds.), Designing for virtual communities in the service of learning (pp. 338-376). Cambridge/New York: Cambridge University Press.
20) Herring, S. C. (2007). A faceted classification scheme for computer-mediated discourse. Retrieved 14th December 2009 from: http://www.languageatinternet.de/articles/2007/761.
21) Humphry, J. (2007, September). I h8 txt msgs: How texting is wrecking our language. Dailymail. Retrieved from https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-483511/I-h8-txt-msgs-How-texting-wrecking-language.html.
22) Jones, R. H, and Hafner, A, C. (2012). Understanding Digital Literacies. London and New York: Routledge.
23) Lamy, M, N. and R, Hampel, (2007). Online communication in language learning and teaching. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
24) Leech, G. N. (1974), Semantics, London: Penguin, pp.xii + 386 (2nd edition, entitled Semantics: the Study of Meaning, 1981).
25) Ling, R and Baron, N . Text messaging and IM: Linguistic comparison of American college data. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, vol. 26,(3), 291-298.
26) McKiernan, T., (2016). Characterising Conversation on WhatsApp: speech-like, or not? Back- channelling, adjective intensification and personal reference, unpublished dissertation, Manchester: The University of Manchester. Retrieved from https://www.academia.edu/30162312/Characterising_Conversation_on_WhatsApp_speech _like_or_not_Back_ channelling_adjective_intensification_and_personal_reference_Postgr aduate_Dissertation
27) Paterson, A. (2010). NetSpeak Write: A new breed of communication. Journal of Interdisciplinary Management, 5, 1–14. Retrieved fromhttps://ojs.library.dal.ca/djim/article/view/2010vol6Paterson/57
28) Price, R. (2015). Texting Is In Decline. http://uk.businessinsider.com/whatsapp-vs-texting- statistics-2015-1.
29) Ong'onda, N. A. Matu, P. M and Omondi, O. (2010). Punctuation as a Sociolinguistic Variable in Text Messages. Sino-US English Teaching 7(9) 42¬47. David Publishing Web.
30) Otemuyiwa, A., (2017). A Linguistic Analysis of WhatsApp Conversations among Undergraduate Students of Joseph Ayo Babalola University, Studies in English Language Teaching, 5(3), 393-405.
31) Reid, E. M. (1994). Cultural Formations in text based virtual realities. Unpublished Masters Thethis. University of Melbourne. Australia.
32) Salaberry, M, R. (1996). A theoretical foundation for the development of pedagogical tasks in computer mediated communication, CALICO Journal, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 5-34,.
33) Sewe, F.O. (2014). Social media as a tool of corporate communication: A case study of Nairobi University. Unpublished master„s thesis, University of Nairobi, Kenya.
34) Sproull, L., & Kiesler, S. (1991). Connections: New ways of working in the networked organization. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
35) Thurlow, C and Brown, A. (2003), "Generation txt? The sociolinguistics of young people's text-messaging," Discourse Analysis Online, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 1-27, 2003.
36) Walther, J. B., & Burgoon, J. K. (1992). Relational communication in computer-mediated interaction. Human Communication Research, 19, 50-88.
37) Weber, R. (1986). Variation in spelling and the special case of colloquial contractions. Visible Language, 20(4), 413–426.
38) Yeboah, J., & Ewur, G. D. (2014). The impact of WhatsApp messenger usage on student’s performance in Tertiary Institutions in Ghana. Journal of education and practice, 5(6), 157-164.
39) Yus, F. (2011). Cyberpragmatics: Internet-mediated communication in context. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins.