JANUARY 2023

VOlUME 06 ISSUE 01 JANUARY 2023
Identity of Javanese-Muslim and Chinese-Confucian Ethnic Entrepreneurial Ethics in the Kanoman Market, Cirebon City
1Heru Cahyono,2Muhammad Said,3Uus Ahmad Husaeni
1 Bunga Bangsa Cirebon University
2State Islamic University of Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta
3Suryakancana University
DOI : https://doi.org/10.47191/ijsshr/v6-i1-50

Google Scholar Download Pdf
ABSTRACT

This study aims to analyze how the ethical identity of Javanese-Muslim and Chinese-Kunghucu ethnic entrepreneurs in Kanoman Market, Cirebon City, is to look deeply into ethnic entrepreneurial ethics in entrepreneurial practice, including in market contestation involving the two ethnicities. This study uses a qualitative method with an anthropological-economic approach to find and explain the entrepreneurial phenomenon involving elements of ethnicity. Primary data comes directly from ethnic entrepreneurs, and secondary data as supporting sources, such as books, journals, proceedings, etc. Exploration, observation, interviews, and in-depth processes carried out data collection. Then, it is equipped with data analysis to answer research questions. The research found that the entrepreneurial ethics of the Javanese-Muslim and Chinese-Kunghucu ethnicity stem from world views, adhered to cultural systems, and connectedness to God or ancestors. The ethnic worldview of God and connectedness to ancestors shape the entrepreneurial ethic. Then, ethnic entrepreneurial ethics shape positive behavior in entrepreneurship.

KEYWORDS:

Entrepreneurship, Identity, Business Competition, and Culture.

REFERENCES

1) Ajib Rosidi, ed., Bahasa Nusantara: Suatu Pemetaan Awal (Jakarta: Dunia Pustaka Jaya, 1999).

2) C. M. Sashi, “Customer Engagement, Buyer-Seller Relationships and Social Media”, Management Decision, 50 (2), 2012, 253.

3) Chang-You Hoon, “Assimilation, Multiculturalism, Hybridity: The Dilemmas of the Ethnic Chinese in Post-Suharto Indonesia”, Asian Ethnicity, 7 (2), 2006, 149-166.

4) Chun-Ting Yang, “Student Ethnic Identity and Language Behaviors in the Chinese Heritage Language Classroom”, Disertasi, Gradute School of The Ohio State University, 2016, 18

5) Deanna Kemp dan John R. Owen, “Community Relations and Mining: Core to Business but Not “Core Business”, Resources Policy, 38 (4), 2013, 523-531.

6) Deny Hamdani, “Cultural System of Cirebonese People: Tradition of Muludan in the Kanoman Kraton”, Indonesian Journal of Social Sciences (4), 1, 2012, 11-22.

7) Faruk, et.al., Perlawanan atas Diskriminasi Rasial-Etnik, Konteks Sosial-Ideologis Kritis Sastra Peranakan Tionghoa (Magelang: IndonesiaTera, 2000).

8) Gavin W. Jones dan Mike Douglass, Mega-urban Regions in Pacific Asia: Urban Dynamics in a Global Era (Singapore: NUS Press, 2008).

9) Gloria Poedjosoedarmo, “The Effect of Bahasa Indonesia as a Lingua Franca on the Javanese System of Speech Levels and Their Functions”, International Journal of Sociology of Language, 177 (3), 2006, 111.

10) Irene Tarakania, et.al., Komitmen Identitas Etnik dalam Kaitannya dengan Eksistensi Budaya Lokal”, Zenit, 2 (2), 2013, 98-105.

11) Jajat Burhanuddin dan Kees van Dijk, ed., Islam in Indonesia: Contesting Images and Interpretations (Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press, 2013).

12) Joshua A. Fishman dan Ofelia Garci, ed., Handbooks of Language and Ethnic Identity: Diciplinary and Regional Perspectives, 1 (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010), xxiii.

13) Laurie Margot Ross, The Encoded Cirebon Mask: Materiality, Flow and Meaning along Java’s Islamic Northwest Coast (Leiden: Brill, 2016), 9-10.

14) Leo Suryadinata, “Kebijakan Negara Indonesia terhadap Etnik Tionghoa: Dari Asmilasi ke Multikulturalisme”, Antropologi Indonesia, 71, 2013.

15) Leo Suryadinata, Ethnic Chinese in Contemporary Indonesia (Singapore: Institute of Southeast Asian Studies, 2008).

16) M. Sanggupri Bochari, Sejarah Kerajaan Tradisional Cirebon (Jakarta: Departemen Pendidikan Nasional, 2001).

17) M. Ikhsan Tanggok, ed., Menghidupkan Kembali Jalur Sutra Baru: Format Baru Hubungan Islam Indonesia dengan Cina (Jakarta: Gramedia Pustaka Utama, 2010).

18) Michael Carney, “Minority Family Business in Emerging Markets: Organization Forms and Competitive Advantage”, Family Business Review, 20 (4), 2007, 289-300.

19) Pamella Allen, “Sastra Diasporatik: Suara-suara Tionghoa Baru di Indonesia”, Antropologi Indonesia, 71, 2003, 64-74.

20) Parsudi Suparlan, “Kesukubangsaan dan Posisi Orang Cina dalam Masyarakat Mejemuk Indonesia”, Antropologi Indonesia, 71, 2003, 23-33.

21) Peter J. M. Nas, ed., The Indonesian Town Revisited (Singapore: Institute of Southeast Asian Studies, 2002).

22) Puji Riyanti, “Relasi Sosial Pedagang Etnis Cina dan Etnis Jawa di Pasar Tradisional”, Komunitas, 5 (1), 2013, 32.

23) Robert W. Hefner, Hindu Javanese: Tengger Tradition and Islam (USA: Princeton University Press, 1989).

24) Sjafri Sairin, “Disintegrasi Sosial: Sebuah Tinjauan Budaya”, Humaniora, 12 (2), 2000, 306.

25) Sri Astuti Buchari, Kebangkitan Etnis menuju Politik Identitas (Jakarta: Yayasan Obor Indonesia, 2014).

26) Susanto Zuhdi, Kota Dagang Cirebon sebagai Bandar Jalur Sutra (Jakarta: Departemen Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan RI, 1998), 101.

27) Viera Bacova, “The Construction of National Identity on Primordialism and Instrumentalism”, Human Affair, 8 (1), 1998, 29-43.

28) Wasino, Wong Jawa dan Wong Cina: Liku-liku Hubungan Sosial antar Etnis Tionghoa dengan Etnis Cina di Solo Tahun 1911-1998 (Semarang: Unnes Press, 2006).

29) William H. Leggett, “Institutionalising the Colonial Imagination: Chinese Middlemen and the Transnational Corporate Office in Jakarta, Indonesia”, Journal of Ethic and Migration Studies, 36 (8), 2010, 1265-1278.

30) Zessy Ardinal Barlan dan Lala M. Kolopaking, “The Role of Paguyuban in Rural Development”, Sodality, 2 (2), 2014, 115-123.

VOlUME 06 ISSUE 01 JANUARY 2023

Indexed In

Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar