VOlUME 06 ISSUE 01 JANUARY 2023
1Bambang Agus Windu Sancono,2Indra Kertati
1,2Faculty of Social and Political Science, University of 17 Agustus 1945, Semarang, 50133,Indonesia
DOI : https://doi.org/10.47191/ijsshr/v6-i1-85Google Scholar Download Pdf
ABSTRACT
The Covid-19 pandemic has had the greatest impact on micro, small, and medium enterprises (MSMEs) in the neighborhood. Community members, particularly the impoverished, feel the economic impact. In Indonesia, the number of MSMEs reached 64.19 million, with Micro and Small Enterprises (MSEs) constituting the vast majority of the business sector (64.13 million, or 99.92%). The Covid-19 pandemic also negatively affects this group. Surprising facts include the fact that managers of micro, small, and medium-sized enterprises (MSME) are in debt and even die trying to sustain their businesses. Covid-19 has altered the economic foundation of the populace, and as a result, numerous regions in Indonesia are suffering economic challenges, particularly for small and microeconomic players. Approximately 1,642 hotels and 6,800 eateries have shuttered in Indonesia, a number that might rise if the Covid-19 outbreak persists for an extended period of time. This amount does not include the thousands of units in the entertainment business sector. Some micro, small, and medium enterprises (MSMEs) were unable to do business as normal during the COVID-19 pandemic and were even forced to temporarily cease operations for a variety of reasons, including lower buying power, low market share, and other impediments. The distribution and manufacturing inadequate circumstances affect a large number of MSMEs. Almost 90% of MSMEs have vanished or even declared bankruptcy. This significant result illustrates the severity of the challenges encountered by people who are disadvantaged in the formal sector, especially the urgent need for support in finance and marketing, as the majority of MSMEs are able to create but are unable to sell their goods. This study aimed to determine the effects of technical and financial support on MSME players in Surakarta. This research approach employs a qualitative descriptive research method that combines descriptive and qualitative processes to produce a thorough examination of the research topic. Descriptive research methods describe phenomena that occur in the field, whereas qualitative research methods explain the depth of the observed events. In addition to the impacted MSMEs' community, the local government is also included in the research sample.
KEYWORDS:evaluation, policy, MSMEs, pandemic, assistance, capital
REFERENCES
1) Aida Handini, Virgia Choiriyati, Wahyuni. 2020. “Digitalisasi UMKM Sebagai Hasil Inovasi Dalam Komunikasi Pemasaran Sahabat UMKM Selama Pandemi COVID-19.” Jurnal Riset Komunikasi 11(2).
2) Akuntansi, Jurnal, Strategi Bertahan UMKM di Tengah Pandemi Covid-, Wan Laura Hardilawati, Universitas Muhammadiyah Riau, Fakultas Ekonomi dan Bisnis Jl Tuanku Tambusai Ujung, and Pekanbaru -Riau. 2020. The Survival Strategy Of Smes During The Covid-19 Pandemic. Vol. 10.
3) Dunn, William Newlin. 2014. Public Policy Analysis. Vol. 1. Pearson.
4) Fischer, Frank, Gerald J. Miller, and Mara S. Sidney. 2016. Handbook of Public Policy Analysis: Theory, Politics, and Methods. Vol. 1. 1st ed. edited by N. J. U. S. A. G. J. M. R. U. N. N. J. U. S. A. M. S. S. R. U. N. N. J. U. S. A. Frank Fischer Rutgers University Newark. CRC Press Taylor & Francis Group.
5) Fitriasari, Fika. 2020. “How Do Small and Medium Enterprises (SMEs) Survive the COVID-19 Outbreak?” Jurnal Inovasi Ekonomi 05(02).
6) Fusch, Patricia, Gene E. Fusch, and Lawrence R. Ness. 2018. “Denzin’s Paradigm Shift: Revisiting Triangulation in Qualitative Research.” Journal of Social Change 10(1). doi: 10.5590/josc.2018.10.1.02.
7) Kristian Pakpahan, Aknolt. 2020. “COVID-19 Dan Implikasi Bagi Usaha Mikro, Kecil, Dan Menengah.” Jurnal Ilmiah Hubungan Internasional.
8) ManjunathaN. 2019. “Descriptive Research.” JETIR1908597 Journal of Emerging Technologies and Innovative Research 6.
9) Ma’ruf, Mu’min, Ikhbaluddin Ikhbaluddin, Suripto Suripto, and Abdurohim Abdurohim. 2021. “PENGEMBANGAN KAPASITAS (CAPACITY BUILDING) USAHA KECIL DAN MENENGAH BIDANG PERTANIAN DI KECAMATAN RANCABUNGUR KABUPATEN BOGOR.” J-3P (Jurnal Pembangunan Pemberdayaan Pemerintahan) 16–32. doi: 10.33701/j-3p.v6i1.1512.
10) Matthew B. Miles, A. Michael Huberman. 1994. Qualitatif Data Analysis Miles And Huberman. Vol. 2. 2nd ed. edited by A. M. H. Matthew B. Miles. Sage Publication.
11) Mubarok, Syahrul, Soesilo Zauhar, and Endah Setyowati. 2020. Journal of Public Administration Studies Policy Implementation Analysis: Exploration of George Edward III, Marilee S Grindle, and Mazmanian and Sabatier Theories in the Policy Analysis Triangle Framework. Vol. 5.
12) Nassaji, Hossein. 2015. “Qualitative and Descriptive Research: Data Type versus Data Analysis.” Language Teaching Research 19(2):129–32.
13) Ozolina-Ozola, Iveta. 2014. “The Impact of Human Resource Management Practices on Employee Turnover.” Pp. 223–26 in Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences. Vol. 156. Elsevier BV.
14) Rowe, Gene, and Lynn J. Frewer. 2004. “Evaluating Public-Participation Exercises: A Research Agenda.” Science Technology and Human Values 29(4):512–57.
15) Sedyastuti, Kristina. 2018. “Analisis Pemberdayaan UMKM Dan Peningkatan Daya Saing Dalam Kancah Pasar Global.” Jurnal Inovasi Bisnis Dan Manajemen Indonesia 2(1).
16) Sugiarti, Yenny, Yenny Sari, and Mochammad Arbi Hadiyat. 2020. “E-Commerce Untuk Meningkatkan Daya Saing Usaha Mikro Kecil Dan Menengah (UMKM) Sambal Di Jawa Timur.” Kumawula: Jurnal Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat 3(2):298. doi: 10.24198/kumawula.v3i2.28181.
17) Widjajanti, Kesi. 2011. MODEL PEMBERDAYAAN MASYARAKAT. Vol. 12.
18) Wilfarda Charismanur Anggraeni, Wulan Puspita Ningtiyas, Nurdiyah Mufidatul Alimah. n.d. “Kebijakan Pemerintah Dalam Pemberdayaan UMKM Di Masa Pandemi Covid-19 Indonesia.”