Volume 06 Issue 10 October 2023
1Aslamiah, 2Celia Cinantya, 3Wahdah Refia Rafianti, 1Ngadimun, 3Rizky Amelia 1Lili Aulia Sari, 1Nurulita Aulia
1Educational Management Departement, Universitas Lambung Mangkurat, Banjarmasin, Indonesia
2Early Childhood Teacher Education Departement, Universitas Lambung Mangkurat, Banjarmasin, Indonesia
3Elementary School Teacher Education Departement, Universitas Lambung Mangkurat, Banjarmasin, Indonesia
DOI : https://doi.org/10.47191/ijsshr/v6-i10-32Google Scholar Download Pdf
ABSTRACT
The demands of globalization make competition occur in all fields, including in the world of education. This study aims to identify and describe the characteristics of a superior school characteristics in the context of superior school development management that emphasizes more on the school climate or culture, such as interpersonal relationships between individuals throughout the school community, learning environment, learning model, pleasant environment, principal leadership, teacher skills, school morale, and spirit correlate positively and significantly with personality and academic achievement of graduates. This phenomenological research reveals the phenomenon of experience obtained based on consciousness in several individuals. This research setting includes SD Negeri Indrasari 1, SD Negeri Indrasari 2, and SD Negeri Tambak baru Ulu, Banjar Regency, South Kalimantan. The three schools were chosen based on the similar characteristics of the school. Namely, it is a public school with A / B accreditation, is in a wetland environment area, and is a favorite school in the region. The results of the research show that the integrated integration between national, local, and typical curricula with Islamic foundations has proven to be able to run in Leading Schools by producing good graduates, institutional management applied at the school level as well as learning management is expected to be a model or basic framework to become a future school.
KEYWORDS:Learning Model, Superior School, Banjar District, Elementary School.
REFERENCES1) N. Latifah, Z. MS, M. S. Sumantri, and B. Setiawan, “Elementary School Teachers’ Perceptions of Indonesian Elementary School Textbooks: A Case Study.,” J. High. Educ. Theory Pract., vol. 23, no. 1, 2023.
2) A. Suriansyah and A. Aslamiah, “Strategi pembelajaran,” Jakarta Rajawali Pers, 2014.
3) M. Mujiati, A. Suriansyah, and R. Effendi, “Effect of Academic Supervision and School Culture on Teacher’s Teaching Quality in Public Islamic Senior High School Banjarmasin,” J. K6, Educ. Manag., vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 126–132, 2019.
4) B. Isdaryanti, M. Rahman, Y. L. Sukestiyarno, T. S. Florentinus, and W. Widodo, “Teachers’ performance in science learning management integrated with character education,” J. Pendidik. IPA Indones., vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 9–15, 2018.
5) M. Aboramadan, B. Albashiti, H. Alharazin, and K. A. Dahleez, “Human resources management practices and organizational commitment in higher education: The mediating role of work engagement,” Int. J. Educ. Manag., vol. 34, no. 1, pp. 154–174, 2020.
6) M. Connolly, C. James, and M. Fertig, “The difference between educational management and educational leadership and the importance of educational responsibility,” Educ. Manag. Adm. Leadersh., vol. 47, no. 4, pp. 504–519, 2019.
7) Aslamiah, A. Suriansyah, R. Amelia, and Ngadimun, “Building professional learning communities (PLC) to increase the quality of education in elementary schools,” Int. J. Innov. Creat. Chang., vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 583–598, 2019.
8) D. Sugiarto and A. Z. Fitri, “Initiating Superior Madrasah Through Madrasah Curriculum Planning in the Era of Society 5.0,” IJECA (International J. Educ. Curric. Appl., vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 101–112, 2023.
9) H. Hasan, A. Alfianoor, and N. Nasrullah, “The Role of Teachers in Developing the Potential of Children with Special Needs at State Superior School 1 Amuntai,” in Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Learning Innovation and Quality Education, 2021, pp. 1–5.
10) Z. Roziqin, “Menggagas Perencanaan Kurikulum Sekolah Unggul,” As-Sabiqun, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 44–56, 2019.
11) S. B. Raharjo and L. Yuliana, “Manajemen sekolah untuk mencapai sekolah unggul yang menyenangkan: Studi kasus di SMAN 1 Sleman Yogyakarta,” J. Pendidik. dan Kebud., vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 203–217, 2016.
12) Y. Afista and M. Y. Abu Bakar, “Islamic Boarding School-Based Madrasah: Policy Efforts to Reform the Superior Education Model,” Al-Hayat J. Islam. Educ., vol. 4, no. 2, 2020.
13) A. Kurniati, D. Dike, and L. Parida, “Pengembangan Literasi Lingkungan Untuk Membangun Sekolah Sehat Dan Hijau Di SD Negeri 01 Kenukut Kecamatan Kelam Permai Kabupaten Sintang,” J. Abdidas, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 223–230, 2021.
14) E. Poerwanti and B. I. Suwandayani, Manajemen Sekolah Dasar Unggul, vol. 1. UMMPress, 2020.
15) J. Dunlosky, K. A. Rawson, E. J. Marsh, M. J. Nathan, and D. T. Willingham, “Improving students’ learning with effective learning techniques: Promising directions from cognitive and educational psychology,” Psychol. Sci. Public Interes., vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 4–58, 2013.
16) M. Jarvis, The psychology of effective learning and teaching. Nelson Thornes, 2005.
17) V. Clarke and V. Braun, “Teaching thematic analysis: Overcoming challenges and developing strategies for effective learning,” Psychologist, vol. 26, no. 2, pp. 120–123, 2013.
18) E. Carnell, C. Lodge, P. Wagner, C. Watkins, and C. Whalley, Learning about learning: Resources for supporting effective learning. Routledge, 2005.
19) R. Amelia, S. I. A. Dwiningrum, and A. Mustadi, “Pandemic Pedagogy in The Era of Digital Transformation,” in ICLIQE 2021: Proceeding of The 5th International Conference on Learning Innovation and Quality Education, 2021, pp. 1–7.
20) A. R. Saavedra and V. D. Opfer, “Learning 21st-century skills requires 21st-century teaching,” Phi Delta Kappan, vol. 94, no. 2, pp. 8–13, 2012.
21) H. Ibda, “Penguatan Literasi Baru Pada Guru Madrasah Ibtidaiyah Dalam Menjawab Tantangan Era Revolusi Industri 4.0,” JRTIE J. Res. Thought Islam. Educ., vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 1–21, 2018.
22) L. S. Dalenogare, G. B. Benitez, N. F. Ayala, and A. G. Frank, “The expected contribution of Industry 4.0 technologies for industrial performance,” Int. J. Prod. Econ., vol. 204, pp. 383–394, 2018.
23) Y. Gamil, M. A. Abdullah, I. Abd Rahman, and M. M. Asad, “Internet of things in construction industry revolution 4.0: Recent trends and challenges in the Malaysian context,” J. Eng. Des. Technol., 2020.
24) A. R. Ahmad, V. A. Segaran, P. G. Raj, and H. R. M. Sapry, “Academic Staff and Industry Revolution 4.0: Knowledge, Innovation and Learning Factor.,” J. Educ. E-Learning Res., vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 190–194, 2020.
25) L. Messina and S. Tabone, “Integrating Technology into Instructional Practices Focusing on Teacher Knowledge,” Procedia - Soc. Behav. Sci., vol. 46, pp. 1015–1027, 2012, doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.05.241.
26) Y. Tao and J. Ma, “Effects of the TPACK Levels of University Teachers on the Use of Online Teaching Technical Tools.,” Int. J. Emerg. Technol. Learn., vol. 17, no. 20, 2022.
27) M. J. Koehler, P. Mishra, and W. Cain, “What is Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPACK)?,” J. Educ., vol. 193, no. 3, pp. 13–19, 2013, doi: 10.1177/002205741319300303.
28) S. Yulianci, N. Nurjumiati, and A. A. Adiansha, “The Effect of Interactive Multimedia and Learning Styles on Students’ Physics Creative Thinking Skills,” J. Penelit. Pendidik. IPA, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 87–91, 2021.
29) L. J. Moleong, “Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif (Edisi Revisi),” PT. Remaja Rosda Karya, 2019, doi: 10.1016/j.carbpol.2013.02.055.
30) D. Silverman, Qualitative research. Sage, 2016.
31) F. Nugrahani, Metode Penelitian Kualitatif: dalam Penelitian Pendidikan Bahasa. 2014.
32) Sugiono, Metode Penelitian Manajemen. Bandung: Alfabeta, 2018.
33) M. B. Miles, A. M. Huberman, and J. Saldaña, “Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook. 3rd,” ed Thousand Oaks, CA Sage, 2014.
34) A. A. Mekarisce, “Teknik pemeriksaan keabsahan data pada penelitian kualitatif di bidang kesehatan masyarakat,” J. Ilm. Kesehat. Masy. Media Komun. Komunitas Kesehat. Masy., vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 145–151, 2020.
35) U. Rathore and U. Das, “Explaining the Superior Education Outcomes of Kerala: The Role of State Activism and Historical Endowment,” Oxford Dev. Stud., vol. 47, no. 2, pp. 205–221, 2019.
36) S. J. Prais, “The superior educational attainments of pupils in religious foundation schools in England,” Natl. Inst. Econ. Rev., vol. 193, pp. 102–105, 2005.
37) C. Binder and C. L. Watkins, “Precision teaching and direct instruction: Measurably superior instructional technology in schools,” Perform. Improv. Q., vol. 3, no. 4, pp. 74–96, 1990.
38) U. Kartini and G. Gudnanto, “Introspection of Superior Generations towards the Application of Innovations with the Character of Pancasila Student Profiles,” Budapest Int. Res. Critics Institute-Journal, vol. 5, no. 3, 2022.
39) D. L. Newman, M. Stefkovich, C. Clasen, M. A. Franzen, and L. K. Wright, “Physical models can provide superior learning opportunities beyond the benefits of active engagements,” Biochem. Mol. Biol. Educ., vol. 46, no. 5, pp. 435–444, 2018.
40) B. Showers, “Aiming for superior classroom instruction for all children: A comprehensive staff development model,” Remedial Spec. Educ., vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 35–39, 1990.
41) X. U. Yuanna, “The mode reform of superior education in the MOOC Times,” High. Educ. Soc. Sci., vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 32–36, 2015.
42) E. C. L. Mora, “Epistemological Foundations for a Pedagogical Model Based on a Complex Perspective for a Superior Educational Organization,” in Proceedings of the 2020 9th International Conference on Educational and Information Technology, 2020, pp. 178–183.
43) E. H. Tyas, S. Sunarto, and L. Naibaho, “Building superior human resources through character education,” TEST Eng. Manag., vol. 83, pp. 11864–11873, 2020.
44) R. Amelia, A. Suriansyah, Aslamiah, and Ngadimun, “The new paradigm of leadership at elementary schools in borneo in the industrial revolution 4.0 Era,” Int. J. Innov. Creat. Chang., vol. 5, no. 5, pp. 159–173, 2019.
45) . Suriansyah, A. Aslamiah, N. Noorhapizah, I. Winardi, and J. Dalle, “The Relationship between University Autonomy, Lecturer Empowerment, and Organizational Citizenship Behavior in Indonesian Universities,” J. Soc. Stud. Educ. Res., vol. 10, no. 4, pp. 127–152, 2019.