Volume 06 Issue 10 October 2023
Armel MBON
Département de Langues and Littératures, Université Marien NGOUABI, Brazzaville, Congo.
DOI : https://doi.org/10.47191/ijsshr/v6-i10-04Google Scholar Download Pdf
ABSTRACT
This article explores words and actions that foreshadow Palamon’s triumph and Arcite’s defeat in their rivalry for Emily in Geoffrey Chaucer’s ‘Knight’s Tale’. In fact, in accordance with Gustav Freytag’s pyramid about the plot structure, at the second step of the pyramid known as the inciting moment or narrative hook, Chaucer sets in motion the rising action of his story making up suspense. This suspense created by the question the author asks by the end of the first part of the tale in the form of ‘demande d’amour’, leaves free rein to uncertain predictions about the triumph or defeat of Palamon or Arcite involved in a merciless struggle for Emily, Hippolyta’s beautiful younger sister and Theseus’s sister-in-law. Thus, this paper purports to demonstrate that for a scrutineer, Palamon is found to be the winner and Arcite the loser from the outset, since there are words and actions that anticipate their triumph and defeat respectively. To detect those hints of triumph and defeat, a formalist approach is used as it emphasizes the form of a literary work to determine its meaning, focusing on literary elements, such as foreshadowing and back-shadowing, and how they work to create meaning.
KEYWORDS:foreshadowing, hint, rivalry, triumph, defeat, tale.
REFERENCES1) Bergan, B. (1991). Surface and secret in the Knight’s Tale. The Chaucer Review 26.1: pp 1-16.
2) Chaucer, G. (1914). The Canterbury Tales. New York: Duffield Collection.
3) Cooper, H. (1996). Oxford Guides to Chaucer the Canterbury Tales. 2nd ed., Oxford University Press.
4) Elbow, P.H. (1972). How Chaucer Transcends Opposites in the “Knight’s Tale.” The Chaucer Review, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 97-112.
5) Finlayson, J. (1992). The “Knight’s Tale”: The Dialogue of Romance, Epic, and Philosophy. The Chaucer Review, vol. 27, no. 2, pp. 126-149.
6) French, W. H. (1949). The Lovers in the “Knight’s Tale. The Journal of English and Germanic Philology, vol. 48, no. 3, pp. 320-328.
7) Higdon, M. J. (2010). Something Judicious This Way Comes...The Use of Foreshadowing as a Persuasive Device in Judicial Narrative. University of Richmond Law Review, Volume 44 | Issue 4, pp.1213-1260.
8) Jensen, E. (1990). Male Competition as a Unifying Motif in Fragment A of the “Canterbury Tales.” The Chaucer Review, vol. 24, no. 4, pp. 320-328.
9) Lentricchia, F. & Dubois, A. (2003). Close reading: The reader. Durham and London: Duke University Press.
10) Rock, C. A. (2008). Forsworn and Fordone: Arcite as Oath-Breaker in Knight’s Tale. Chaucer Review: A Journal of Medieval Studies and Literary Criticism 40.4 (2006): 416-432. MLA Bibliography. EBSCOhost.
11) Stretter, R. (2003). Rewriting perfect Friendship in Chaucer’s “Knight’s Tale and Lydgate’s “Fabula Duorum Mercatorum.” The Chaucer Review, vol. 37, no. 3, pp. 234-252.