Volume 06 Issue 10 October 2023
1Rufiah, 2Raharjo, 3Nur Ducha
1Postgraduate, Master of Biology Education, State University of Surabaya, Indonesia
2,3Associate Professor, Master of Biology Education, State University of Surabaya, Indonesia
DOI : https://doi.org/10.47191/ijsshr/v6-i10-05Google Scholar Download Pdf
ABSTRACT
This research aims to (1) produce a biology e-worksheet based indigenous Rujak Cingur on nutrient (2) examine the value of feasibility of biology e-worksheet based indigenous Rujak Cingur on nutrient. This research uses 4D model. The model consists of 4 steps; (1) define, this stage aims to analysis the problem, (2) Design start to design product that will be developed according to the results of the needs in learning analysis, (3) Development, the process of creating and developing product according to design, (4) Disseminate to improve the product based on criticism and suggestions from the questionnaire responses done by respondents after using the developed product. Validity of the instrument is counted by the percentage agreement through the validation nutrient of media expert, material expert, and questionnaire responses of respondents. The results of these research and development are (1) produce a biology e-worksheet based indigenous Rujak Cingur on nutrient (2) the developed media own a high score of feasibility with a very good predicate. This shows that the developed learning media is feasible to use in learning.
KEYWORDS:a biology e-worksheet, indigenous Rujak Cingur, nutrient, research development
REFERENCES1) Hyytinen, H., Löfström, E., & Lindblom-Ylänne, S. (2016). Challenges in Argumentation and Paraphrasing among Beginning Students in Educational Sciences. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 61(4), 411–429. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/00313831.2016.1147072
2) Stephensona, S., & Sadler-McKnighta, N. P. (2013). Developing Critical Thinking Skills Using the Science Writing Heuristic in the Chemistry Laboratory. Education Research Chemistry and Practice, 1(3), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1039/C5RP00102A
3) Ekmekçi, E. (2018). Examination of Studies Regarding Pre-Service EFL Teachers’ Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPACK) in Turkey. International Journal of Eurasia Social Sciences, 9(34), 2180–2193.
4) Feldman, G. (2014). Curricular Reforms that Improve Students’ Attitudes and Problem-Solving Performance. European J of Physics Education, 5(1), 15–44. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.20308/ejpe.91287
5) Izci, K., & Caliskan, G. (2017). Development of Prospective Teachers’ Conceptions of Assessment and Choices of Assessment Tasks. International Journal of Research in Education and Science, 3(2), 464–474. https://doi.org/10.21890/ijres.327906
6) Milner-bolotin, M., Egersdorfer, D., & Vinayagam, M. (2016). Investigating the Effect of Question-Driven Pedagogy on the Development of Physics Teacher Candidates’ Pedagogical Content Knowledge. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 12(2), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.12.020128
7) Yeh, Y., Hsu, Y., Wu, H., Hwang, F., & Lin, T. (2013). Developing and Validating Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge-Practical (TPACK-Practical) Through the Delphi Survey Technique. British Journal of Educational Technology, 45(4), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12078
8) Danczak, S. M., D, C. T., & Overton, T. L. (2017). “What Does the Term Critical Thinking Mean to You?” A Qualitative Analysis of Chemistry Undergraduate, Teaching Staff and Employers’ Views of Critical Thinking. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 1(1), 1–3. https://doi.org/10.1039/C6RP00249H
9) Ndongfack, M. N. (2015). TPACK Constructs: A Sustainable Pathway for Teachers Professional Development on Technology Adoption. In Creative Education (Vol. 6, pp. 1697–1709). https://doi.org/10.4236/ce.2015.616171
10) Ahonen, A. K., & Kinnunen, P. (2015). How Do Students Value the Importance of Twenty-first Century Skills? Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 59(4), 395–412. https://doi.org/10.1080/00313831.2014.904423
11) Rojas, C.N, Penafiel, G.A.A.,, Buitrago, D.F.L., & Romero, C.A.T. (2021). Society 5.0: A Japanese Concept for a Superintelligent Society. Sustainability . 13(12), 6567 https://doi.org/10.3390/su13126567
12) Abdurrahman, A., Nurulsari, N., Maulina, H., & Ariyani, F. (2019). Design and validation of inquiry-based STEM learning strategy as a powerful alternative solution to facilitate gift students facing 21st century challenging. Journal for the Education of Gifted Young Scientists, 7(1), 33–56. https://doi.org/10.17478/jegys.513308
13) Kim, S., Raza, M., & Seidman, E. (2019). Improving 21st-century teaching skills: The key to effective 21st-century learners. Research in Comparative and International Education, 14(1), 99–117. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745499919829214
14) Saleh, S. E. (2019). Critical thinking as a 21st century skill: Conceptions, implementation and challenges in the EFL classroom. European Journal of Foreign Language Teaching, 4(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.5281/ZENODO.2542838
15) Yennita, Y., & Zukmadini, A. Y. (2021). Problem-based learning (PBL) and blended learning in improving critical thinking skills and student learning activities in biochemistry courses. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1731, Article 012007. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1731/1/012007
16) Haryanti, Y. D. (2017). Model Problem Based Learning Membangun Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis Siswa Sekolah Dasar. Jurnal Cakrawala Pendas, 3(2). https://doi.org/10.31949/jcp.v3i2.596
17) Defiyanti & Sumarni, W. (2019). Analisis Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis Peserta Didik Pada Penerapan Problem Based Learning Berbantuan Lembar Kerja Peserta Didik Bermuatan Etnosains. Jurnal Phenomenon. Vol. 09 (No. 2).
18) Ennis, R. H. (1993). Critical thinking assessment. Theory into Practice, 32(3), 37–41. https://doi.org/10.1080/00405849309543594
19) Rosidin, U., Kadaritna, N., & Hasnunidah, N. (2019). Can argument driven inquiry models have impact on critical thinking skills for students with different personlity types? Cakrawala Pendidikan, 38(03), 511–526. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.21831/ cp.v38i3.24725
20) Vong, S.U. & Kaewurai, W. (2017). Instructional model development to enhance critical thinking and critical thinking teaching ability of trainee students at regional teaching training center in Takeo province, Cambodia. Kasetsart Journal of Social Sciences. Vol. 38. pp 88-95. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.kjss.2016.05.002
21) Magdalena, M., Putra, A.P., Winarti, A. (2021). Kepraktisan Materi E-LKPD Pencemaran Lingkungan Kepada Berlatih Berpikir Kritis. BIO-INOVED : Jurnal Biologi-Inovasi Pendidikan Jurnal Akses Terbuka Volume 3, Edisi 3, halaman. 210-215
22) Aktoprak, Ayten & Hursen, Cigdem ( 2022). A Bibliometric And Content Analysis Of Critical Thinking In Primary Education. Critical Skills and creativity. Colume 44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2022.101029
23) Saputri, A.C, Sajidan, R., & Prasetyanti, N.M. (2019) Improving Students’ Critical Thinking Skills in Cell-Metabolism Learning Using Stimulating Higher Order Thinking Skills Model. International Journal of Instruction. Vol.12, No.1
24) Susilo, B. E., Darhim, D., & Prabawanto, S. (2019). Students critical thinking skills thinking skills through the integration of problem based learning and group toward concepts differences in finding area of a plane region and definite integral. Unnes Journal of Mathematics Education, 8(1), 1-7.
25) Widiawati, L., Joyoatmojo, S., & Sudiyanto. (2018). Higher order thinking skills as Effect of Problem Based Learning in the 21st Century Learning. International Journal of Multicultural and Multireligious Understanding. Vol. 5, No. 3.
26) Tiruneh, D. T., De Cock, M., Weldeslassie, A. G., Elen, J., & Janssen, R. (2017). Measuring criti¬cal thinking in physics: Development and vali¬dation of a critical thinking test in electricity and magnetism. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 15(4), 663-682.
27) Facione, Peter A. (2013). Critical Thinking: What It Is and Why It Counts. Insight Assessment.
28) Suardi, Moh. (2018). Belajar dan Pembelajaran. Yogyakarta: CV Budi Utama
29) Martin, F., Budhrani, K., Kumar, S., & Ritzhaupt, A. (2019). Award-Winning Faculty Online Teaching Practices: Roles and Competencies. Online Learning Journal, 23(1), 184–205. https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v23i1.1329.
30) Van Alten, D. C. D., Phielix, C., Janssen, J., & Kester, L. (2019). Effects of Flipping the Classroom on Learning Outcomes and Satisfaction: A Meta-Analysis. Educational Research Review. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2019.05.003.
31) Zulfiani, Suwarna, I. P., & Sumantri, M. F. (2020). Science Adaptive Assessment Tool: Kolb’s Learning Style Profile and Student’s Higher Order Thinking Skill Level. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 9 (2), 194–207. https://doi.org/10.15294/jpii.v9i2.23840.
32) Furman Shaharabani, Y., & Yarden, A. (2019). Toward narrowing the theory–practice gap: characterizing evidence from in-service biology teachers’ questions asked during an academic course. International Journal of STEM Education, 6(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-019-0174-3
33) Fauzi, M.R & Jannah, R. (2019). Pengembangan Lembar Kegiatan Peserta Didik Berbasis Science, Environment, Technology and Society (SETS) pada Materi Dinamika Rotasi dan Keseimbangan Benda Tegar Kelas XI MIA. Natural Science: Jurnal Penelitian Bidang IPA dan Pendidikan IPA 5 (2), 2019, (907-916)
34) Haryanto, A, & Ernawati, M.D.W. (2020). E-Worksheet for Science Processing Skills Using Kvisoft Flipbook.Jurnal Internasional Teknik Online dan Biomedis,16(3), 46–58. https://doi.org/10.3991/IJOE.V16I03.12381
35) Adiasih, P., & Brahmana., R. K.M.R. (2015). Persepsi Terhadap Makanan Tradisional Jawa Timur: Studi Awal Terhadap Mahasiswa Perguruan Tinggi Swasta Di Surabaya. KINERJA, Volume 19, No.2
36) Tanjung, N.U., Amira, A.P., Muthmainah, N. & Rahma, S. (2022). Junk Food dan Kaitannya dengan Kejadian Gizi lebih Pada Remaja. Jurnal Ilmiah Kesehatan Masyarakat. Volume 14 Edisi 3
37) Datar, A. & Nicosia, N. (2012). Junk Food in Schools and Childhood Obesity. Journal of Public Policy Analysis and Management. https://doi.org/10.1002/pam.21602
38) Sugiyono. (2009). Metode Penetilian Kuantitatif Kualitatif dan R&D. Bandung: CV Alfabeta.
39) Ratnaningtyas L, Wilujeng I and Kuswanto H 2019 Proc. International Seminar on Science Education (Yogyakarta) vol 1233 (Bristol: IOP Publishing) p 1-8 https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1233/1/012054
40) Sari F P, Ratnaningtyas, Wilujeng I, Jumadi and Kuswanto H 2019 Proc. International Seminar on Science Education (Yogyakarta) vol 1233 (Bristol: IOP Publishing) p 1-8 https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1233/1/012052
41) Erfianti, L., Istiyono, E., & Kuswanto, H. (2019). Developing Lup Instrument Test to Measure Higher Order Thinking Skills (HOTS) Bloomian for Senior High School Students. International Journal of Educational Research Review, 4(3), 320–329. https://doi.org/10.24331/ijere.573863.
42) Ntobuo N E, Arbie A and Amali L N 2018 J. Pendidik. IPA Indonesia 7 246–51 https://doi.org/10.15294/jpii.v7i2.14344
43) Anesia R, &Anggoro B S (2018) https://ejournal.radenintan.ac.id/index.php/IJSME/index
44) Benjamin D Jee and Florencia K Anggoro 2012 Journal of Cognitive Education and Psychology 11 196-208 https://dx.doi.org/10.1891/1945-8959.11.2.196