¹Yolanda Dwi Putri Hayati, ²Dr. Joko Setiyono, S.H., M.Hum

^1,2Master of Law, Faculty of Law, Diponegoro University, Indonesia

DOI : https://doi.org/10.47191/ijsshr/v6-i10-95

Google Scholar Download Pdf
ABSTRACT

The role of the Administrative Court in resolving disputes within the "Government Administration" in Indonesia caused by the absence of executive power has a significant impact. The State Administrative Court, Legal Proceedings Law, regulates the integration and clarification of the enforcement of State Administrative Court decisions, so the execution of the decision is genuinely dependent on the good faith of the government body or its officials in complying with the law. The problem of executing the decisions of the State Administrative Court is a common legal phenomenon. As mentioned by Paulus Effendi Lotulung, the issue of execution is present in various countries; even though multiple regulations and mechanisms regulate it, but there is still no sufficiently effective coercive legal means to force the relevant agencies or officials to comply with the decision. Several factors that cause the weakness of the execution of State Administrative Court (PTUN) decisions that have obtained legal force are as follows: First, the absence of legal regulations that require State Administrative Court officials to implement legally binding court decisions. Second, the factor of judges' reluctance to include forced monetary payments in case the relevant State Administrative Court officials do not execute the court decision. Third, the compliance factor of State Administrative Court officials in carrying out legally binding court decisions. The issue of executing State Administrative Court decisions is also related to the implementation of regional autonomy, as with regional autonomy, all regional government officials in districts/cities have extensive authority in managing their regions and inevitably use administrative decision-making methods.

KEYWORDS:

Administrative Law, Deviation in Enforcement of Decisions, State Administrative Court (PTUN).

REFERENCES
1) Dinoroy iMarganda iAritonang. iKompleksitas iPenegakan iHukum iAdministrasi iDan iPidana iDi iIndonesia. iJurnal iLegislasi iIndonesia, iVol. i18. iNo. i1. iMaret i2021: i45-58. i

2) Farida iAzzahra, iPemberlakuan iSanksi iAdministratif: iBentuk iUpaya iPaksa iMeningkatkan iKepatuhan iPejabat iAtas iPelaksanaan iPutusan iPeradilan iTata iUsaha iNegara i(Teori iEfektivitas iHukum). iBinamulia iHukum iVol. i9 iNo. i2. iDesember i2020, i(127-140). i

3) Mohammad iAfifudin iSoleh, iEksekusi iTerhadap iPutusan iPengadilan iTata iUsaha iNegara iYang iBerkekuatan iHukum iTetap, i(Mimbar iKeadilan; iJurnal iIlmu iHukum), iFebruari i2018.

4) Anthony iGiddens, iThe iThird iWay: iJalan iKetiga iPembaharuan iDemokrasi iSosial i(Jakarta: iGramedia iPustaka iUtama, i200), ihal. i100. i

5) Basah iS, iPerlindungan iHukum iTerhadap iSikap iTindak iAdministrasi iNegara. iBandung: ipenerbit iAlumni, i1992.

6) Paulus iEffendi iLotulung, i“Peradilan iTata iUsaha iNegara iDi iIndonesia iDibandingkan iDengan iPeradilan iAdministrasi iYang iBerlaku iDi iBerbagai iNegara”, idalam iMengakji iKembali iPokok-Pokok iPikiran iPembentukan iPerdailan iTata iUsaha iNegara, iLPP-HAN, iJakarta, i2003, ihlm. i64.

7) Kementerian iPendayagunaan iAparatur iNegara idan iReformasi iBirokrasi. i2013, iNaskah iAkademik iRancangan iUndang-Undang iAdministrasi iPemerintahan. iJakarta: iKementrian iPendayagunaan iAparatur iNegara idan iReformasi iBirokrasi. i

8) Marbun iS, iPeradilan iAdministrasi iNegara idan iUpaya iAdministratif iDi iIndonesia. iYogyakarta: iF.H. iUII iPress.

9) Wirjono iProjodikoro, iAsas-Asas iIlmu iNegara idan iPolitik, iEresco, iBandung, i1971.

10) Paulus iEfendi iLotulung, iLintasan iSejarah idan iGerak iDinamika iPeradilan iTata iUsaha

11) Negara i(PERATUN) iDi iMata iPaulus iEffendi iLotulung, iSalemba iHumanika, iJakarta, i2013.

12) Mohammad iAfifudin iSoleh, iEksekusi iTerhadap iPutusan iPengadilan iTata iUsaha iNegara iYang iBerkekuatan iHukum iTetap. iUntag iSurabaya. i2017.

13) Victor iSitumorang, iDasar-Dasar iHukum iAdministrasi iNegara i(Jakarta: iBina iAksara, i1989).

Volume 06 Issue 10 October 2023