Volume 06 Issue 11 November 2023
1Putu Ayu Sriasih Wesna, 2I Gusti Bagus Andika Bagaskara
1,2Magister Kenotariatan Universitas Warmadewa
DOI : https://doi.org/10.47191/ijsshr/v6-i11-10Google Scholar Download Pdf
ABSTRACT
Provisions regarding a marital agreement which can be made during the time the husband and wife are in a marriage bond can be used as an excuse by a husband and wife to separate a receivable which initially constitutes one receivable and is then to be made into two receivables to create two creditors so that they fulfil the requisites of a petition for bankruptcy and PKPU. Such a condition has occurred in the bankruptcy and PKPU petition submitted by Stefanus Maria Sudjanto. S and his wife to Goenawan Rahardja. Motivated by the phenomenon, this research is aimed at examining the legal consequences of marital separation agreements for a joint receivable in a bankruptcy and PKPU petition and determining the position of creditors in the bankruptcy and PKPU petition for a receivable that had been made before the marriage separation agreement made. To achieve these objectives, we use the normative legal research method with three approaches–statute approach, conceptual approach, and case approach. We use primary legal materials, secondary legal materials and tertiary legal materials. These legal materials were collected through a literature study. These materials were analyzed using a qualitative analysis technique. The results show the marital separation agreement made by Stefanus Maria Sudjanto. S and his wife are null and void, because it violates the legal requirements of an agreement, namely Article 1320, subsection (4) of the Civil Code. In addition, a marital agreement shall also be made in good faith in compliance with the provisions of Article 1338. The marital separation agreement, made by Stefanus Maria Sudjanto. S and his wife was made not in good faith; it is null and void. Thus, the joint receivable of Stefanus Maria Sudjanto. S and his wife having been made before the marriage agreement remains as a joint receivable. Therefore, based on the definition of debt and the principle of balance, a husband and wife who have harmed the debtor and then enter into a marital separation agreement while in the marriage bond is only a creditor and does not have legal standing as two creditors in the submission of a bankruptcy statement.
KEYWORDS:marital agreement; bankruptcy petition; creditor
REFERENCES1) Asnawi, M. Natsi. 2020. Hukum Harta Bersama: Kajian Perbandingan Hukum, Telaah Norma, Yurisprudensi dan Pembaharuan Hukum. 1st ed. Jakarta: Kencana.
2) Dewi, Ni Luh Putu Geney Sri Kusuma, Putu Eka Trisna Dewi, and Ni Putu Riyani Kartika Sari. 2021. “Regulation of Copyright Certificate As A Material Guarantee and Bankrupt Estate/Beodel In Indonesia.” ADI Journal on Recent Innovation (AJRI) 2(2):186–200. doi: https://doi.org/10.34306/ajri.v2i2.76.
3) Dewi, Putu Eka Trisna. 2019. “Implementasi Penundaan Kewajiban Pembayaran Utang (PKPU) Dalam Kepailitan Ditinjau Dari Undang-Undang Nomor 37 Tahun 2004 Tentang Kepailitan Dan Penundaan Kewajiban Pembayaran Utang.” Jurnal Hukum Saraswati 4(2):280–91.
4) Dewi, Putu Eka Trisna. 2020. “Akibat Hukum Perkawinan Beda Agama Yang Dilangsungkan Di Luar Negeri.” Yustitia 14(2):1–9.
5) Dewi, Putu Eka Trisna. 2021. “The Execution of Bankrupt Assets in the Case of Cross-Border Insolvency: A Comparative Study between Indonesia, Malaysia, Singapore, and the Philippines.” The Indonesian Journal of Southeast Asian Studies (IKAT) 5(1):47–59. doi: 10.22146/ikat.v5i1.64157.
6) Dewi, Putu Eka Trisna. 2023. “Legal Consequences of Bankruptcy on Joint Assets after Divorce.” Jurnal Hukum Prasada 10(1):43–48. doi: https://doi.org/10.22225/jhp.10.1.2022.43-48.
7) Hartini, Rahayu. 2018.“Putusan Pengadilan Niaga Semarang Nomor 23/Pdt.Sus-PKPU/2018/PN Niaga Smg.”
8) Hartono, Siti Soemarti. 1993. Pengantar Hukum Kepailitan Dan Penundaan Pembayaran: Seri Hukum Dagang. Yogyakarta: Fakultas Hukum UGM.
9) HR, H. A. Damanhuri. 2007. Segi-Segi Hukum Perjanjian Perkawinan Harta Bersama. Bandung: CV. Mandar Maju.
10) Prodjohamidjojo, Martiman. 2021. Hukum Perkawinan Indonesia. Jakarta: Indonesia Legal Center Publishing.
11) Shubhan, Hadi. 2015. Hukum Kepailitan: Prinsip, Norma dan Praktik di Peradilan. Jakarta: Kencana.
12) Subekti, R. 1996. Pokok-Pokok Hukum Perdata. Jakarta: Intermasa.
13) Sutini, Wiwin, and Putu Eka Trisna Dewi. 2021. “Pembagian Harta Bersama Pasca Perceraian Terhadap Kontribusi Isteri Sebagai Pencari Nafkah (Studi Komparasi Di Australia, Malaysia Dan Jepang).” Aktual Justice 6(2):121–39. doi: https://doi.org/10.47329/aktualjustice.v6i2.768.
14) Waluyo, Bambang. 2008. Penelitian Hukum Dalam Praktek. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika.