¹Jumadi, ²Faradina, ³Fatah Yasin, ⁴Rina Listia

^1,2,3Indonesian Language Education, Lambung Mangkurat University, Banjarmasin, Indonesia
⁴English Language Education, Lambung Mangkurat University, Banjarmasin, Indonesia

DOI : https://doi.org/10.47191/ijsshr/v6-i11-67

Google Scholar Download Pdf
ABSTRACT

Based on rankings carried out by a number of international institutions, the literacy level of Indonesian students is still below the literacy level of other countries. Based on the research results, there are a number of factors that cause this. One of these factors is the need to provide quality textbooks for critical literacy learning. However, until now there have been no good textbooks designed to improve critical literacy competencies. Therefore, research into the development of this textbook was carried out. The development of this book is based on the land environment and critical literacy. In the development process the ASSURE model was used(analyze learners; state objectives; select (methods, media, and materials); utilize materials; require learners' participation; evaluate and revise). The results of the development obtained the following findings: the validation results from material and language experts obtained an average score of 89%, which means it is very feasible; the results of media expert validation obtained an average score92% which also means very feasible; and students' literacy competence before using this book was 59.64 and after using this textbook their competence became 79.47, which means there was an increase in literacy competence by 24.95%. The implication is that the textbooks resulting from this development need to be used in language learning in schools to improve students' critical literacy competencies.

KEYWORDS:

Textbooks, Wetland Environment, Competence, Critical Literacy

REFERENCES
1) Abdenia, Arman. (2015). Practicing Critical Literacy in Second Language Reading. In International Journal of Critical Pedagogy. Vol. 6, (2).

2) Barton, D., Hamilton, M. (2000). Literacy Practices. In Barton, D., Hamilton, M., Ivanic, R. (Eds.), Situated Literacies: Reading and Writing in Context (pp. 7–15). New York: Routledge.

3) Baynham, M. (1995). Literacy Practices: Investigating Literacy in Social Contexts. London: Longman.

4) Davidowitz, S.S. (2019). Everybody Lies. Jakarta: Gramedia Pustaka Utama.

5) Dewabrata, Mikael. (2018) PISA Results Officially Announced, Indonesia Experiences a Decrease in Scores in Every Field.https://www.zenius.net/blog/23169/pisa-20182-2019-standard-internasional. Accessed 25 May 2020.

6) Freire, P. (1972). Pedagogy of the Oppressed. New York: Herder & Herder

7) Gee, J. P. (1996). Social Linguistics and Literacies: Ideology in Discourses. London: Routledge.

8) Johnson, E. B. (2002). Contextual Teaching and Learning. USA: Corwin Press, Inc.

9) Jumadi et al. (2018). Critical Literacy Competencies of SMPN Students in Barito Kuala Regency. (Unpublished Research Report). Banjarmasin: FKIP ULM.

10) Jumadi et al (2020). Critical Literacy Competencies of SMPN Students Who Live in River Environment Areas in Banjarmasin City. (Unpublished Research Report). Banjarmasin: FKIP ULM.

11) McLaughlin, M. & Allen, M. B. (2002). Guided Comprehension: A Teaching Model for Grades 3-8. Newark, DE: International Reading Association.

12) Nichols, T. (2018). The Death of Expertise. Translation by Ruth Meigi P. Jakarta: Gramedia Popular Literature.

13) Smaldino, SE, Russell, JD, Heinich, R. and Molenda, M. 2005. Instructional Technology and Media for Learning. New Jersey: Person Merrill Prentice Hall Inc.

14) UNESCO Institute for Statistics. (2008). International Literacy Statistics: A Review of Concepts, Methodology, and Current Data. Montreal, Canada: UNESCO Institute for Statistics

Volume 06 Issue 11 November 2023