Volume 06 Issue 12 December 2023
1Suci Romadhani, 2Galensia Maya Madisa, 3Theresia Anita Christiani, ST, 4Mahendra Soni Indriyo
1,2Students Of Magister Of Law, Faculty Of Law, Universitas Atma Jaya Yogyakarta, Indonesia
3,4Lecturer Of Faculty Of Law, Universitas Atma Jaya Yogyakarta, Indonesia
DOI : https://doi.org/10.47191/ijsshr/v6-i12-88Google Scholar Download Pdf
ABSTRACT
The increasing interest and community needs in Information Technology-Based Joint Funding Services (LPBBTI) have led to the development of LPBBTI application services. LPBBTI companies collect by accessing and contacting debtor contacts and disseminating personal data such as the debtor's Identity Card (KTP) used when registering at the LPBBTI. Such inappropriate collection can occur due to debtors making payment arrears or defaulting. This study discusses the regulation on the protection of personal data of LPBBTI debtors in realizing legal objectives to obtain legal certainty. This research is normative research using a statutory approach. The results showed that Law Number 27 of 2022, in practice, has not realized its legal objectives because many LPBBTI commits violations by disseminating debtors' data for the collection process. The billing process that is different from the regulations that have been regulated will have an impact on the agreement that has been agreed between the user and the operator (LPBBTI). The implementation of agreements that are violated or not by laws and regulations, then the agreement is null and void so that it impacts the debtor's legal certainty. Default collection by LPBBTI must be based on the principles in Law Number 27 of 2022, one of which is the principle of expediency and legal certainty. The principles contained in the Personal Data Protection Law are indeed based on legal objectives, but in practice, the Law does not realize legal purposes.
KEYWORDS:Legal Certainty, Personal Data Protection, Debtor, LPBBTI.
REFERENCES1) AFPI. (n.d.). Retrieved 11 2023, 19, from afpi.or.id: https://afpi.or.id/articles/detail/sejarah-perkembangan-fintech-di indonesia
2) Alvandiano, A. Z., & Rizka. (2022). Kepastian Hukum Terhadap Pemberi Pinjaman Kaitannya Penerima Pinjaman Melakukan Wanprestasi dalam Transaksi Peer to Peer Lending. Jurnal Kertha Semaya, 10(2), 339.
3) Ananda. (n.d.). Gramedia Blog. Retrieved 11 19, 2023, from gramedia.com: https://www.gramedia.com/literasi/teori kepastian-hukum/
4) Angeline, P. (2023). Perlindungan Data Pribadi Bagi Penerima Dana Fintech Lending dalam Perspektif Hukum Positif Indonesia. Jurnal Kertha Semaya, 11(12).
5) Arvante, J. Z. (2022). Dampak Permasalahan Pinjaman Online dan Perlindungan Hukum Bagi Konsumen Pinjaman Online. IPMHI Law Journal, 2(1), 77.
6) Asma, D. C. (2022). Analisis Perkembangan Pinjaman Online dan Pendapat Gen Z di Indonesia Pada Era Revolusi Industri 4.0. Medan: UMSU.
7) Efendi, J., & Ibrahim, J. (2016). Metode Penelitian Hukum Normatif dan Empiris. Depok: Prenadamedia Group.
8) FAQ Fintech Lending. (n.d.). Retrieved Desember 6, 2023, from ojk.go.id: https://www.ojk.go.id/id/kanal/iknb/data-dan statistik/direktori/fintech/Documents/FAQ%20Fintech%20Lending.pdf
9) Halilah, S., & Arif, M. F. (2021). Asas Kepastian Hukum Menurut Para Ahli. Jurnal Hukum Tata Negara, 4(2), 58.
10) Januarsyah, M. P. (2017). Penerapan Prinsip Ultimum Remedium dalam Tindak Pidana Korupsi Kajian Putusan Nomor 2149 K/PID.SUS/2011. Jurnal Yudisial, 10(3), 260.
11) Julyano, M., & Sulistyawan, A. Y. (2019). Pemahaman Terhadap Asas Kepastian Hukum Melalui Konstruksi Penalaran Positivisme Hukum. Jurnal Crepido, 1(1), 14.
12) Kristanto, A. P. (2023). Perlindungan Terhadap Data Pribadi dalam Aplikasi Digital sebagai Bentuk Perlindungan Hak Asasi Manusia. Unes Law Review, 5(3).
13) Munawaroh, N. (2022, 10 31). Hukum Online. Retrieved 11 25, 2023, from hukumonline.com: https://www.hukumonline.com/klinik/a/pelindungan-data-pribadi-dalam-penyelenggaraan-ifintech-i-lt5c498fb94dc87
14) Natalia, S. (2023). Perlindungan Data Pribadi Nasabah Terkait Pinjam Meminjam (Peer to Peer Lending). Jurnal Kertha Semaya, 12(1).
15) Novridasati, W., Ridwan, & Prakarsa, A. (2020). Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Desk Collector Fintech Ilegal serta Perlindungan Terhadap Korban. Jurnal Litigasi, 21(2), 241.
16) Otoritas Jasa Keuangan. (2023, 10 9). Retrieved 11 23, 2023, from ojk.go.id: https://ojk.go.id/id/kanal/iknb/financial technology/Pages/Penyelenggara-Fintech-Lending-Berizin-di-OJK-per-9-Oktober-2023.aspx
17) Prayogo, R. T. (2016). Penerapan Asas Kepastian Hukum dalam Peraturan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 1 Tahun 2011 tentang Hak Uji Materil. Jurnal Legislasi Indonesia, 13(2), 194.
18) Salma, S. D. (2023). Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Korban yang Terjebak dalam Pinjaman Online. Syntax Literate: Jurnal Ilmiah Indonesia, 8(7).
19) Silaswara, D., & Kusnawan, A. (2022). Analisa Persepsi Masyarakat terhadap Penggunaan Aplikasi Pinjaman Online. Primanomics: Jurnal Ekonomi dan Bisnis, 20(3), 2.
20) Suari, K. R., & Sarjana, I. M. (2023). Menjaga Privasi di Era Digital: Perlindungan Data Pribadi di Indonesia. Jurnal Analisis Hukum, 6(1).
21) Tektona, R. I., Setyawan, F., & Prima, F. (2023). Kepastian Hukum Pemilik Data Pribadi dalam Aplikasi Satu Sehat. Jurnal Legislasi Indonesia, 20(1), 35.
22) Wahyuni, R. A., & Turisno, B. E. (2019). Praktik Finansial Teknologi Ilegal dalam Bentuk Pinjaman Online ditinjau dari Etika Bisnis. Jurnal Pembangunan Hukum Indonesia, 1(2), 380.
23) Yunanto. (2019). Hakikat Asas Pacta Sunt Servanda dalam Sengketa yang dilandasi Perjanjian. Law, Development & Justice Review, 2, 42.