Volume 06 Issue 12 December 2023
1Felicia, 2Andika Hatidame, 3Wilda Yuli Anggara, 4Woro Murdiati
1,2,3Students of Magister Of Law, Faculty Of Law, Universitas Atma Jaya Yogyakarta, Indonesia,
4Lecturer Faculty of Law Universitas Atma Jaya Yogyakarta, Indonesia
DOI : https://doi.org/10.47191/ijsshr/v6-i12-93Google Scholar Download Pdf
ABSTRACT
Indonesia has a plurality of religions adhered to by its population. The issue of marriage in Indonesia has become a polemic because often couples who will enter into a marriage of different religions avoid the existing laws in Indonesia by entering into marriage abroad, or continue to carry out marriage even though they are of different religions, while some convert to the religion of one of the partners so that the marriage can take place. The turmoil that arose to the surface after the birth of SEMA Number 2 of 2023 made the assumption that its contents were incompatible with Indonesia's diversity and Pancasila, a setback in guaranteeing the rights and freedoms of citizens from diverse backgrounds, and curbing the freedom of judges in interpreting and making decisions that were as fair as possible according to the trial. The type of research used is Normative research, which relies on primary legal materials with a statutory approach. The purpose of this research is to find out the syncranization and harmonization of SEMA 2 Year 2023 in the regulation of interfaith marriages in Indonesia. The conclusion of this research is that SEMA No. 2 of 2023 does not contradict the existing laws above it when associated with existing marriage regulations in Indonesia because marriage law in Indonesia submits the validity of marriage based on each religion. Human rights in Indonesia in Law Number 39 of 1999 concerning human rights marriage is carried out in accordance with statutory provisions, SEMA is not a legal product, but only as a guide for judges in deciding cases of interfaith marriages.
KEYWORDS:Marriage, Religious Marriage, Law.
REFERENCES1) Agustian, M. (2019). Pendidikan Multikutural. Jakarta: Universitas Katolik Indonesia Atma Jaya.
2) Alamsyah, I. (2014, September 16). News Republika. Diambil kembali dari Nikah Beda Agama, Buddha: Harus Seagama, tak Bisa Ditawar (II): https://news.republika.co.id/berita/nbzau8/nikah-beda-agama-buddha-harus-seagama-tak-bisa ditawar-ii
3) Alip, R. (2022, Oktober 4). Gereja Kristus Raja Paroki Bajiro. Diambil kembali dari Rom, apakah boleh orang Katolik menikah dengan orang yang beda agamanya?: https://parokibaciro.net/romo-menjawab/rom-apakah-boleh-orang-katolik menikah-dengan-orang-yang-beda agamanya/#:~:text=Perkawinan%20beda%20agama%20termasuk%20halangan,jika%20syarat%2Dsyaratnya%20telah%20 terpenuhi.
4) Buhari Pamilangan (2022). Implikasi Perkawinan Beda Agama Dalam Perspektif Hukum Islam Di Kecamatan Sangalla Selatan Kabupaten Tana Toraja
5) Hanifah, M. (SOUMATERA LAW REVIEW). Perkawinan Beda Agama Ditinjau dari Undang-undang Nomor 1 Tahun 1974 . Soumatera Law Review, 298.
6) Imanuel, V. (2016). Kedudukan Peraturan Kebijkan Dalam Undang-Undang Administrasi Pemerintah. Refleksi Hukum Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 7.
7) Ishaq. (2020). Metode Penelitian Hukum . Bandung: Alfa Beta.
8) Lestari, N. (2018). Promblematika Hukum Perkawinan Di Indonesia. Jurnal Sistem IAKN Bengkulu, 47.
9) Made, dkk. (2021). Perkawinan Beda Agama Dalam Prespektif Hak Asasi Manusia Di Indonesia. Jurnal Preferensi Hukum, 21.
10) Makalew, M. J. (2013). Akibat Hukum Dari Perkawinan Beda Agama Di Indonesia. Lex Privatum, 134.
11) Maulana, , P. R., & Hidayat, T. (2022). ANALISIS YURIDIS NORMATIF TERHADAP PENETAPAN . Jurnal Islamic Family Law, 2.
12) Muhammad Irpan, (2016). Perkawinan Beda Agama Di Indonesia Studi Perbandingan Pemikiran Prof.Dr. Nurcholish Madjid Dan Prof. Dr. Ali Mustafa Yaqub (Skripsi, Fakultas Syariah dan Hukum Universitas Islam Negeri: Jakarta)
13) Pattinasarany, Y. (2022). Keabsahan Surat Edaran Yang Muatan Materinya Bersifat Pengaturan Dan Sanksi. Saniri, 32.
14) Pengadilan Agama Probolinggo. (2022). Konflik Norma Perkawinan Beda Agama dalam Undang-Undang Nomor 1 Tahun 1974 tentang Perkawinan, Kompilasi Hukum Islam, dan Undang-Undang Nomor 23 Tahun 2006 tentang administrasi kependudukan : https://badilag.mahkamahagung.go.id/artikel/publikasi/artikel/nadzirotus-sintya-falady-s-h-cpns-analis perkara-peradilan-calon-hakim-2021-pengadilan-agama-probolinggo
15) Prasetya, D. V. (2020). Kedudukan Surat Edaran Mahkamah Agung Berdasarkan Undang-Undang Nomor 12 Tahun 2011 Tentang Pembentukan Peraturan Perundang-Undangan. JOM Fakultas Hukum Universitas Riau.
16) Riana, F. (2023, Agustus 6). Makin Sulit Menikah Beda Agama. Retrieved from Koran Tempo: https://koran.tempo.co/read/topik/483671/tahapan-menikah-beda-agama
17) Sabon, M. (2019). Ilmu Negara. Jakarta: Universita Atma Jaya Jakarta.
18) Santoso, A. H. (2021). Perspektif Keadilan Hukum Teori Gustav Radbruch Dalam Putusan PKPU “PTB”. Jurnal Jatiswara, 4-5.
19) Wahyudi. (2022). Pengaturan Perkawinan Beda Agama Di Indonesia. Jurnal Hukum Keluarga Islam, 2.
20) Zamroni. (2023). Sisi Hukum Pencatatan Perkawinan Penghayatan Kepercayaan. Surabaya: Scorpindo Media Pustaka