Dwi Tatak Subagiyo

Faculty of Law, Wijaya Kusuma Surabaya University, Jl. Dukuh Kupang XXV No. 54 Post Code 60225

DOI : https://doi.org/10.47191/ijsshr/v6-i5-12

Google Scholar Download Pdf
ABSTRACT

Research with the title creditor position in consumer financing agreements as a result of fiduciary guarantees not being registered, will raise two problems as follows, first, what are the characteristics of consumer financing agreements with fiduciary guarantees, and second, how default is non-fulfillment of achievements or obligations set by certain parties in an engagement. The methodology used in analyzing the problems in this study uses a normative juridical method with two approaches, namely the statutory approach and the concept approach, to produce an in-depth analysis. Based on the discussion that has been carried out in the previous chapter, the following conclusions can be formulated: First, that the characteristics of consumer financing agreements with fiduciary guarantees. The agreement is made by default the contents of the agreement, and the agreement is the principal agreement. Furthermore, it is bound by a fiduciary guarantee agreement which is an assecoir agreement (additional agreement) to the main agreement. After an agreement is reached, then the fiduciary guarantee will be charged and the fiduciary guarantee will be registered in accordance with Government Regulation No. 21 of 2015. The position of the creditor does not register the fiduciary guarantee object as a concurrent creditor. Second, default is the non-fulfillment of achievements or obligations set by certain parties in an engagement. Default in the guarantee is said to cancel the guarantee agreement, and only the main agreement applies. The implementation of the execution of fiduciary guarantees can be done in 3 ways, in accordance with article 29 UUJF, the 3 ways are by means of executorial titles, parateexecutie and private sales. Legal protection for debtors in the forced withdrawal of fiduciary collateral objects that are not registered, namely there are preventive and repressive protections. And the settlement can be done peacefully (kindly), win-win solution or through consumer dispute resolution institutions such as BPSK.

KEYWORDS:

position; creditor; financing; consumer; fiduciary

REFERENCES

BOOKS
1) Anita Lydia, 2012, “Perlindungan Hukum Kreditor Dengan Jaminan Fidusia”, Fakultas HukumUniversitas Pembangunan Nasional Veteran Jawa Timur.

2) Apriya Rukmala Sari, 2011, Penyelesaian Wanprestasi Dalam Perjanjian Kredit Kendaraan Bermotor Dengan Jaminan Fidusia, Fakultas Hukum Universitas Muhamadiyah Surakarta.

3) D.Y. Witanto, 2015, Hukum Jaminan Fidusia dalam Perjanjijan Pembiayaan Konsumen, CV. Mandar Maju, Bandung, hlm. 1.

4) Fred B.G. Tumbuan, 2001, Pokok-Pokok Undang-Undang tentang Kepailitan Sebagaimana Diubah oleh Perpu Nomor 1 Tahun 1998, Dalam Penyelesaian Utang Piutang Melalui Pailit atau Penundaan Kewajiban Pembayaran Utang, Editor: Ridhi A. Lontoh, Alumni, Bandung.

5) Hani Lisdiyani, 2015, Implementasi Jaminan Fidusia Dalam Pemberian Kredit di BMT Tamzis Yogyakarta, Fakultas Syariah dan Hukum Universitas Islam Negeri Sunan Kalijaga Yogyakarta.

6) Herlin Budiono, 2008, Kumpulan Tulisan Hukum Perdata di Bidang Kenotariatan, Citra Aditya Bakti, Bandung.

7) J. Satrio II, 2002, Hukum Jaminan Hak Jaminan Kebendaan Fidusia, PT. Citra Aditya Bakti, Bandung.

8) M. Yahya Harahap, 2009, Ruang Lingkup Permasalahan Eksekusi Bidang Perdata, Edisi Kedua, Sinar Grafika, Jakarta.

9) Mariam Darus Badrulzaman, 2010, Mencari Sistem Hukum Benda Nasional, Alumni, Bandung.

10) Munir Fuady, 2003, Jaminan Fidusia, Cetakan Kedua Revisi, Citra Aditya Bakti, Bandung.

11) Munir Fuady, Hukum tentang Pembiayaan, PT. Citra Aditya Bakti, Bandung, 2014.

12) Peter Mahmud Marzuki, 2011, Penelitian Hukum, Kencana Pranada Media Group, Jakarta.

13) Phillipus M. Hadjon, 1987, Perlindungan Hukum Bagi Rakyat Indonesia, PT. BinaIlmu, Surabaya.

14) Purwahid Patrik, 1994, Dasar-Dasar Hukum Perikatan (Perikatan Yang Lahir Dari Perjanjian dan Dari Undang-Undang), Mandar Maju, Bandung.

15) R. Subekti I, 1982, Jaminan-Jaminan Untuk Pemberian Kredit Menurut Hukum Indonesia, PT. Alumni, Bandung.

16) Rachmadi Usman, 2008, Hukum Jaminan Keperdataan, Sinar Grafika, Jakarta.

17) Satjipto Raharjo, 2000, Ilmu Hukum, PT. Citra Aditya Bakti, Bandung.

18) Sri Soedewi Masjchoen Sofwan, 1980, Hukum Jaminan di Indonesia Pokok-Pokok Hukum Jaminan dan Perorangan, Badan Pembinaan Hukum Nasional Departemen Kehakiman, Jakarta.

19) Sunaryo, 2008, Hukum Lembaga Pembiayaan, Sinar Grafika, Jakarta.

20) T. Joseph Bockrath, 2000, Contracts and The Legal Environment for Engineers and Architects. Six Edition, Mc-Graw Series in Construction Enginering and Management, United States.

21) Yahman, 2011, Karakteristik Wanprestasi dan Tindak Pidana Penipuan yang Lahir Dari Hubungan Internasional atau PRT, Prestasi Pustaka Raya, Bandung.

JOURNAL
1) Fani Martiawan, 2014, Eksistensi Kreditor Separatis Sebagai Pemohon dalam Perkara Kepailitan, Perspektif, Volume XIX Nomor 1 Januari 2014, Fakultas Hukum Universitas Wijaya Kusuma Surabaya, Surabaya, hlm. 9.

2) Gladys Octavinadya Melati, 2015, Pertanggungjwaban Notaris Dalam Pendaftaran Fidusia Online Terhadap Penerima Fidusia, Jurnal, hlm. 68.

WEBSITE
1) Ramadhan Muawad, “Jaminan Fidusia Dalam Perjanjian”, (diakses 5 October 2017) available from URL:http://ramadhanmuawad. wordpress.com/2015/10/29/jaminan-Fidusia-dalam-
perjanjian-pembiayaankonsumen

2) Sheny Adisti, Fidusia Sebagai Jaminan Dalam Pemberian Kredit di Perusda BPR Bank PasarKlaten, (cited September 19), available from URL: http://eprints.uns.ac.id/4764/1/134870908201008201.pdf

3) Tommy Simatupang, Prestasi, Wanprestasi dan Ganti Rugi, diakses tanggal 5 Februari 2018, situs: http://www.berandahukum.com/ 2016/05/prestasi-wanprestasi-dan-ganti-rugi.html?m=1

VOlUME 06 ISSUE 05 MAY 2023