Elferida Sormin

Universitas Kristen Indonesia & Mayjen Sutoyo No.2, Cawang, East Jakarta, Indonesia

DOI : https://doi.org/10.47191/ijsshr/v6-i7-40

Google Scholar Download Pdf
ABSTRACT

The purpose of this research is to find out whether the application of practicum methods can improve learning outcomes as well as to know how much the increase in chemistry is learning outcomes that are taught using the practicum method. The research method used in this study is a quasi-experimental design with two groups, a pretest and a post-test. Sample In this study, there were 56 students in class XI of 28 students as an experimental class and 28 students as a class control taken by purposive sampling technique. The research result shows that the significance value (Sig.) in the experimental class as well as in the control class of 0.000 is less than 0.05 (0.000 < 0.05). This means that practical and conventional methods, each used in the experimental and control classes, had a significant effect on students' chemistry learning outcomes. But based on analysis gain value, it is known that there was an increase of 31% in the class experiment and 12% in the control class. It can be concluded that increasing learning outcomes in the experimental class that apply the practicum method is better than the control class.

KEYWORDS:

Practicum learning method, learning outcomes, laboratories, experimental

REFERENCES

1) Ariani, Rosyda Safrida. 2006. Efforts to Improve Chemistry Learning Outcomes Through the Learning Model with the IBL Approach (Inquiry Based-Learning) in Class XI SMA 12 Semarang. Semarang: Semarang State University.

2) Cahyono, Edy, Ratnawati Kusuma Ningsih. 2008. Yield Improvement High School Students Learn Chemistry With Assignments and Assessments Portfolio. Journal of Chemistry Education Innovation Volume 2 Number 1. Semarang: Semarang State University.

3) Dahlan, S.M. 2013. Sample Size and Sampling Method. New York: Salemba Medika.

4) Djajadisastra, Yusuf. 1982. Education for Children with Learning Difficulties. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.

5) Erlidayanti, Rilia Iriani, Leny .2010. Improving Student Learning Outcomes Through the Reverse Learning Model (Reciprocal Teaching) With the Utilization of the Internet on the Concept of Reaction Rate. Journal of Science Education Innovation Volume 1 Number 1. Banjarmasin: Unlam.

6) Hamalik, Oemar. 2007. Teaching and Learning Process. Jakarta: Earth Script.

7) Hamid, Rimba and Aceng Haetami. 2008. Improving Learning Outcomes Chemistry Class XI IPA I SMAN 5 Kendari Through Models Quantum Learning. Kendari: Scientific Journal.

8) Istikharah. 2006. Development of Systems Learning Media Packages SMA Class SMA Class XI Semester 2 Colloid Based Curriculum 2004. Thesis. Yogyakarta: FMIPA UNY.

9) Nurrochmah, Siti. 2005. Development of Chemistry Learning Media Computer Assisted About Colloids for SMA/MA Students Class XI Semester 2 as a Source of Independent Learning. Thesis. Yogyakarta: FMIPA UNY.

10) Payong, Marcel Ruben. 1997. Good Bye Teacher. www.kompas.com/kompas.print/6412/ 09/opinion/1427597.htm-43k.

11) Sagala, Saiful. 2005. The Concept and Meaning of Learning. Bandung:Alphabet.

12) Sudjana, Nana. 2005. Fundamentals of Teaching and Learning Processes. Bandung: PT Algensindo New Light.

13) Sugiyono. 2015. Educational Research Methods (Quantitative Approach, Qualitative and R&D). Bandung: Alphabet.

14) Suparno, Paul. 2007. Constructivistic Physics Learning Methodology and Pleasant. Yogyakarta: Sanata Darma University.

15) Susilo, Bambang. 2010. Development of Colloid Learning Media For SMA/MA With Chemo-Entrepreneurship (CEP) Using Macromedia Flash 8. Thesis. Yogyakarta: FMIPA UNY.

VOlUME 06 ISSUE 07 JULY 2023