JULY 2023

VOlUME 06 ISSUE 07 JULY 2023
Position of Deed of Land Deed Official on Legal Certainty for Ownership of Certificates
1Herie Ketabahanko, 2Yulia Qamariyanti, 3Erlina
1Master of Notary, University of Lambung Mangkurat
2,3Faculty of Law, University of Lambung Mangkurat
DOI : https://doi.org/10.47191/ijsshr/v6-i7-91

Google Scholar Download Pdf
ABSTRACT

The purpose of this research is to analyse how the legality of the Land Deed Makers Office position is in the process of land registration of certificates of ownership and how is the legal certainty of landowners regarding Land products for owners of land certificates. The method used in this scientific research article is the method of normative legal scientific research articles. The results of this discussion are first, by issuing certificates in registration activities it is intended that right holders can easily prove their rights. Therefore, a certificate is strong evidence as referred to in Article 19 of the Agrarian Law. Second, that there is still no legal certainty that can be given by the state to the owners of land certificates, because if they experience a loss and their assets will be executed by the court based on a decision that has permanent legal force, the community does not have any trust in them. So that the government's participation in regulating land, which includes regulations regarding the sale and purchase of land and land registration at the National Land Agency office, must also be accompanied by good bureaucracy so that the process runs smoothly.

KEYWORDS:

Land Deed Official; Legal Certainty; Certificate.

REFERENCES

1) Adjie, Habib. Sekilas Dunia Notaris dan PPAT Indonesia: Kumpulan Tulisan. Bandung: Mandar Maju, 2009.

2) Arief, Anggraeny. “Pelaksanaan Asas Kontradiktur Delimitasi dalam Proses Pendaftaran Tanah Sistematis Lengkap.” Jurisprudentie: Jurusan Ilmu Hukum Fakultas Syariah dan Hukum 5, no. 1 (8 Juni 2018): 206–15. https://doi.org/10.24252/jurisprudentie.v5i2.5812.

3) Ashshofa, Burhan. Metode Penelitian Hukum. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta, 2013.
https://opac.perpusnas.go.id/DetailOpac.aspx?id=850013.

4) Atikah, Noor. “Kedudukan Surat Keterangan Tanah Sebagai Bukti Kepemilikan Hak Atas Tanah Dalam Sistem Hukum Pertanahan Indonesia.” Notary Law Journal 1, no. 3 (13 Juli 2022): 263–89.
https://doi.org/10.32801/nolaj.v1i3.29.

5) Azwar, Sarifuddin. Metode Penelitian. Cetakan Kesembilan. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar, 2009.

6) Bakri, Muhammad. Hak Menguasai Tanah Oleh Negara (Paradigma Baru Untuk Reformasi Agraria). Yogyakarta: Citra Media, 2007.

7) Belladina, B, Y. Pujiwati, dan B. Rubiati. “Kepastian Hukum Produk Pendaftaran Tanah Sistematik (PTSL) Terkait Tumpang Tindih Sertifikat (Overlapping) Serta Penerapan Asas Iktikad Baik Dalam Penguasaan Pemanfaatan Lahan Overlap.” Juris and Society: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial dan Humaniora, 119-130, 1, no. 1 (2021).

8) Hadjon, Philipus M. Perlindungan Hukum Bagi Rakyat di Indonesia: Sebuah Studi tentang Prinsip-Prinsipnya, Penanganannya oleh Pengadilan dalam Lingkungan Peradilan Umum dan Pembentukan Peradilan Administrasi Negara. Surabaya: PT. Bina Ilmu, 1987.

9) Lestario, Arie, dan Erlina Erlina. “Sistem Pendaftaran Tanah Yang Memberikan Perlindungan Hukum Bagi Pemegang Sertifikat Hak Atas Tanah Di Indonesia.” Notary Law Journal 1, no. 1 (22 Februari 2022): 1–30. https://doi.org/10.32801/nolaj.v1i1.1.

10) Ma’ruf, Umar, dan Dony Wijaya. “Tinjauan Hukum Kedudukan Dan Fungsi Notaris Sebagai Pejabat Umum Dalam Membuat Akta Otentik (Studi Kasus Di Kecamatan Bergas Kabupaten Semarang).” Jurnal Pembaharuan Hukum 2, no. 3 (2015): 299–309. https://doi.org/10.26532/jph.v2i3.1507.

11) Marzuki, Peter Mahmud. Penelitian Hukum. Jakarta: Kencana, 2008.

12) Nurkristia, Desy. “Asas Kepastian Hukum Dalam Kedudukan Girik Terhadap Sertipikat Hak Atas Tanah.” Jurnal Suara Hukum 3, no. 2 (30 September 2021): 251–73. https://doi.org/10.26740/jsh.v3n2.p251-273.

13) Rahmat, Andi Muhammad. “Perlindungan Hukum terhadap Notaris yang Beritikad Baik Membuat Akta Jual Beli Saham dalam Kasus Tindak Pidana Pencucian Uang.” Lentera Hukum 6, no. 1 (28 April 2019): 97–116. https://doi.org/10.19184/ejlh.v6i1.9669.

14) Saraswati, Made Putri, I. Made Arya Utama, dan Ida Bagus Agung Putra Santika. “Kedudukan Hukum Akta Ppat Setelah Terbitnya Sertipikat Karena Peralihan Hak Atas Tanah.” Acta Comitas. Tesis, Universitas Udayana, 2018. https://doi.org/10.24843/AC.2018.v03.i01.p03.

15) Sidharta, Sidharta. Moralitas Profesi Hukum Suatu Tawaran Kerangka Berpikir. Bandung: Refika Aditama, 2006.

16) Susanti, Dyah Ochtorina, dan A’an Efendi. Penelitian Hukum. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika, 2014.

17) Yasa, Putu Astika, dan I Nyoman Bagiastra. “Kedudukan Sertipikat Hak Atas Tanah terkait Berlakunya Sistem Publikasi Negatif di Indonesia.” Jurnal Magister Hukum Udayana 10, no. 4 (Desember 2021): 827–40.

VOlUME 06 ISSUE 07 JULY 2023

Indexed In

Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar