Volume 06 Issue 09 September 2023
Alphonse Mingnimon AFFO
University of Abomey – Calavi
DOI : https://doi.org/10.47191/ijsshr/v6-i9-21Google Scholar Download Pdf
ABSTRACT
Female Genital Mutilations (FGM) officially constitute a particular form of Gender-Based Violence associated with certain socio-cultural groups and / or regions. They are generally practiced with the purpose to control women sexuality. In Benin, the political will materialized by restrictive legislation as well as multiple strategies and actions developed to eliminate FGM has not yet been able to curb their trend. On the contrary, they persist through more underground forms that are sometimes deterritorialized. This paper aims to examine factors underlying the persistence of FGM in Benin. The explanatory factors for the persistence of FGM were investigated through the analysis of a secondary data from the survey on the persistence of FGM in the four departments of North Benin conducted in 2020. Thus, Multiple Correspondence Analysis, Regression analysis and content analysis methods were used. Results show that parents who approved the continuation of FGM are mostly uneducated, live in rural areas in poor households, are unaware of the laws that prohibit FGM, praise the benefits of FGM and already have at least one “circumcised” daughter. Moreover, they consider the control actions ineffective. For them, FGM represents a symbol of identity that provides affection, security, protection, solidarity and survival to women. The analyses also show that the department, the ethnicity, household wealth index, the recognition of the advantages of FGM, the non-regret of having been affected by FGM and the ignorance of the laws against FGM perpetuate this phenomenon. From a reproductive justice perspective, it is possible to negotiate with the grassroot population the perpetuation of the symbolic and festive character of this identity rite by substituting any attack on the physical and psychological integrity of women with sexual and reproductive health education.
KEYWORDS:Female Genital Mutilation, factors, persistence, Benin
REFERENCES1) Andro A. , Lesclingand M., 2016 “Les mutilations génitales féminines. État des lieux et des connaissances”, Population 2016/2 (Vol. 71), p224 -311
2) Blundo G., Olivier de Sardan J-P (dir.), 2007, État et corruption en Afrique, Une anthropologie comparative des relations entre fonctionnaires et usagers (Bénin, Niger, Sénégal), Paris, Karthala, 376p.
3) Cabane B C., 2006 “Fondements sociaux de l’excision dans le Mali du XXIème siècle”, Revue Asylon(s), N°1, Les persécutions spécifiques aux femmes.
4) CEDOCA, 2014 : GUINEE. Les mutilations génitales féminines, 43p
5) Chege JN, 2001. An Assessment of the Alternative Rites Approach for Encouraging Abandonment of Female Genital Cutting in Kenya. New York: Population Council; 2001.
6) Coene G, 2007 “Être féministe, ce n’est pas exclure !”, Revue européenne des migrations internationales, vol. 23 - n°2
7) Dieterlen G., Essai sur la religion Bambara, PUF, 1951, p 88-89
8) Droz, Y., 2009, “La morale de l’interdiction de la clitoridectomie en pays kikuyu”. Anthropologie et Sociétés, 33 (3), 118–137
9) Gage, A.J. & Van Rossem, R, 2006, “Attitudes toward the discontinuation of female genital cutting among men and women in Guinea”. International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics, 92(1), p 92–96.
10) Galtung, J. (1990) ‘Cultural Violence’, Journal of Peace Research, 27(3), pp. 291–305.
11) Griaule M., Dieu d’eau, ed. Fayard, Paris 1966
12) Hayford, Sarah R. 2005. “Conformity and Change: Community Effects on Female Genital Cutting in Kenya.” American Sociological Association 46(Jun.): pp. 121-140.
13) INS et ICF International (Guinée), 2013 Enquête démographique et de santé et à indicateurs multiples (EDS-MICS 2012), Calverton, Maryland, 530p
14) INSAE & ORC Macro, 2002, INSAE et. 2002. Enquête Démographique et de Santé au Bénin 2001. Calverton, Maryland, USA, 387p.
15) INSAE, 2007, Enquête Démographique et de Santé du Bénin 2006, Rapport final, 359p
16) INSAE & ICF, 2013, Enquête Démographique et de Santé du Bénin 2012, Rapport final, 403p
17) INSTAT, CPS/SS-DS-PF et ICF, 2019, Enquête Démographique et de Santé au Mali 2018. Bamako, Mali et Rockville, Maryland, USA : INSTAT, CPS/SS-DS-PF et ICF, 643p.
18) Reb, J & al. 2013. What works and what does not: a discussion of popular approaches for the abandonment of female genital mutilation. Obstet Gynecol Int. 2013:1–10. doi: 10.1155/2013/348248.
19) Karmaker, B. & al, 2011 “Factors associated with female genital mutilation in Burkina Faso and its policy implications », International Journal for Equity in Health, p1-9.
20) Kay McChesney Y., (2015) “Successful Approaches to Ending Female Genital Cutting,” The Journal of Sociology & Social Welfare: Vol. 42 : Iss. 1 , Article 2.
21) Kimani and Shell-Duncan B, 2018, “Medicalized Female Genital Mutilation/Cutting: Contentious Practices and Persistent Debates” Curr Sex Health Rep. 2018; 10(1): 25–34.
22) Kpozehouen A & al., 2019, “Female Genital Mutilation in Benin: Prevalence and Associated Factors Based on Data from the Demographic and Health Survey, 2011-2012”, World Journal of Public Health 2019; 4(4): 74-80
23) Muller J-C, 1993, Les deux fois circoncis et les presque excisées. Le cas des Dìì de l'Adamaoua (Nord Cameroun), Cahiers d'Études africaines Année 1993 132 p 531-544
24) Muteshi J, Sass J., 2005, Female Genital Mutilation in Africa: An Analysis of Current Abandonment Approaches. Nairobi: Program for Appropriate Technology in Health.
25) Obiora, O. & al.,. 2020 “Female genital mutilation in Africa: Scoping the landscape of evidence » International Journal Of Africa Nursing sciences 12 (2020) 100189, p 1-12.
26) OMS, 2008, Éliminer les mutilations sexuelles féminines. Déclaration inter-institutions, 51 p
27) Rigmor C. Berg & Eva Denison (2013) “A Tradition in Transition: Factors Perpetuating and Hindering the Continuance of Female Genital Mutilation/Cutting (FGM/C) Summarized in a Systematic Review”, Health Care for Women International,p837-859.
28) Sakeah E. & al., 2018 “Prevalence and factors associated with female genital mutilation among women of reproductive age in the Bawku municipality and Pusiga District of northern Ghana », BMC Women's Health, p 1-10.
29) Shell-Duncan B, Moore Z, Njue C. 2017 : Trends in medicalization of female genital mutilation/cutting: what do the data reveal?, Evidence to End MGF/C: Research to Help Women Thrive. Population Council: New York.
30) Shell-Duncan B, Naik R, Feldman-Jacobs C. A State-of-the-Art Synthesis on Female Genital Mutilation/Cutting: What Do We Know Now? October 2016. 2016, New York: Population Council https://www.popcouncil.org/uploads/pdfs/SOTA_Synthesis_2016_FINAL.pdf.
31) UN Commission on Human Rights, Convention on the Rights of the Child., 7 March 1990, E/CN.4/RES/1990/74, available at: https://www.refworld.org/docid/3b00f03d30.html
32) UNICEF, 2016, “Female genital mutilation/cutting: A global concern”, New York, 2 p.
33) Vissandjée B. & al., 2014 “Female genital cutting (FGC) and the ethics of care: community engagement and cultural sensitivity at the interface of migration experiences”, BMC International Health and Human Rights 2014, 14:13.