September 2023

Volume 06 Issue 09 September 2023
All-Around: Elite Gymnasts’ Perspectives on Creating a Healthy Culture
1Heather Bolton, 2Daniel Rhind
1,2School of Sport, Exercise and Health Sciences, Loughborough University, Leicestershire, UK.
DOI : https://doi.org/10.47191/ijsshr/v6-i9-30

Google Scholar Download Pdf
ABSTRACT

The need to create healthy cultures within Gymnastics has been demonstrated by a rseies of high profile cases which are illustrative of unhealthy cultures. The present study interviewed 6 international level gymnasts to explore their perceptions as to what constitutes a healthy culture. Inductive thematic analysis highlighted the need to adopt a socio-ecological approach which recognizes the influences of factors at the individual (i.e., developing ability and achieving personal goals), interpersonal (i.e., supportive peer relationships and effective coach-athlete relationship)and institutional (i.e., sense of community and a focus on developing psychosocial skills) levels. The findings from the present study can be used to inform coaches and national governing bodies on the importance of these factors, especially when considering the prioritisation of gymnasts ’psychological wellbeing in the context of elite sport.

KEYWORDS:

satisfaction, gymnastics, coach-athlete relationship, psychological wellbeing

REFERENCES

1) Wankel, L. M., & Berger, B. G. (1990). The Psychological and Social Benefits of Sport and Physical Activity. Journal of Leisure Research, 22(2), 167-182.

2) Riemer, H. A., & Chelladurai, P. (1998). Development of the athlete satisfaction questionnaire (ASQ). Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 20(2), 127-156.

3) Chelladurai, P., & Riemer, H. A. (1997). A classification of facets of athlete satisfaction. Journal of sport management, 11(2), 133-159.

4) Hodge, K., Lonsdale, C., & Jackson, S. A. (2009). Athlete engagement in elite sport: An exploratory investigation of antecedents and consequences. Sport Psychologist, 23(2).

5) Coakley, J. J. (1990). Sport in society: Issues and Controversies (4th ed.). CV Mosby Company.

6) Jowett, S. (2005). The coach-athlete partnership. The Psychologist, 18(7), 412-415.

7) Jowett, S., & Cockerill, I. M. (2003). Olympic medallists’ perspective of the athlete–coach relationship. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 4(4), 313-331.

8) Gould, D., Guinan, D., Greenleaf, C., Medbery, R., & Peterson, K. (1999). Factors affecting Olympic performance: Perceptions of athletes and coaches from more and less successful teams. The Sport Psychologist, 13(4), 371-394.

9) Kelley, H. H., & Thibaut, J. W. (1978). Interpersonal relations: A theory of interdependence. New York, NY: Wiley.

10) Jowett, S. (2007). Interdependence analysis and the 3+ 1Cs in the coach-athlete relationship. In S. Jowett & D. Lavallee (Eds.), Social psychology in sport (pp. 15-27). Human Kinetics.

11) Canary, D. J., & Stafford, L. (1994). Maintaining relationships through routine and strategic interaction. In D. J. Canary & L. Stafford (Eds.), Communication and Relational Maintenance (pp. 3–22). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.

12) Rhind, D. J., & Jowett, S. (2010). Relationship maintenance strategies in the coach-athlete relationship: The development of the COMPASS model. Journal of applied sport psychology, 22(1), 106-121.

13) Davis, L., Jowett, S., & Tafvelin, S. (2019). Communication strategies: The fuel for quality coach-athlete relationships and athlete satisfaction. Frontiers in Psychology, 10(2156).

14) Jowett, S., & Nezlek, J. (2012). Relationship interdependence and satisfaction with important outcomes in coach–athlete dyads. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 29(3), 287-301.

15) Jowett, S., & Ntoumanis, N. (2004). The coach–athlete relationship questionnaire (CART‐Q): Development and initial validation. Scandinavian Journal of Medicine & Science in Sports, 14(4), 245-257.

16) Lorimer, R. (2009). Coaches' satisfaction with their athletic partnerships. International Journal of Coaching Science, 3(2), 57-66.

17) Jowett, S., & Don Carolis, G. (2003). The coach-athlete relationship and perceived satisfaction in team sports. In R. Stelter (Ed.), XIth European Congress of Sport Psychology Proceedings (Vol. 11, pp. 83-84). Copenhagen, Denmark: Det Samfundsvidenskabelige Fakultets.

18) Ironson, G. H., Smith, P. C., Brannick, M. T., Gibson, W. M., & Paul, K. B. (1989). Construction of a Job in General scale: A comparison of global, composite, and specific measures. Journal of Applied Psychology, 74(2), 193-200.

19) Hopf, C. (2004). Qualitative interviews: An overview. A companion to qualitative research, 203(8).

20) Rhind, D. J., Jowett, S., & Yang, S. X. (2012). A comparison of athletes' perceptions of the coach-athlete relationship in team and individual sports. Journal of Sport Behavior, 35(4), 433-452.

21) Stirling, A. E., & Kerr, G. A. (2009). Abused athletes' perceptions of the coach-athlete relationship. Sport in Society, 12(2), 227-239.

22) White, R. L., & Bennie, A. (2015). Resilience in youth sport: A qualitative investigation of gymnastics coach and athlete perceptions. International Journal of Sports Science & Coaching, 10(2-3), 379-393.

23) Dowdell, T. (2011). Characteristics of effective gymnastics coaching. Science of Gymnastics Journal, 2(1), 15-24.

24) Jowett, S., O’Broin, A., & Palmer, S. (2010). On understanding the role and significance of a key two-person relationship in sport and executive coaching. Sport & Exercise Psychology Review, 6(2), 19-30.

25) UK Sport. (2020, August 25). The Whyte Review: the review into complaints of mistreatment in gymnastics. https://www.uksport.gov.uk/news/2020/08/25/independent-review-into-gymnastics-begins

26) Queirós, A., Faria, D., & Almeida, F. (2017). Strengths and limitations of qualitative and quantitative research methods. European Journal of Education Studies, 3(9), 369-387.

27) Fossey, E., Harvey, C., McDermott, F., & Davidson, L. (2002). Understanding and evaluating qualitative research. Australian & New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry, 36(6), 717-732.

28) Qu, S. Q., & Dumay, J. (2011). The qualitative research interview. Qualitative Research in Accounting & Management, 8(3), 238-264.
Volume 06 Issue 09 September 2023

Indexed In

Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar