Volume 07 Issue 01 January 2024
Professor Chibuogwu V. Nnaka
Faculty of Education National Open University of Nigeria
DOI : https://doi.org/10.47191/ijsshr/v7-i01-106Google Scholar Download Pdf
ABSTRACT
The study investigated the perceptions of learners and facilitators on the best practices for effective teaching and learning of science courses in open and distance learning. A descriptive survey design was used for the study. Eight research questions were posed to guide the study. A total of 180 students and 30 tutorial facilitators selected by purposive sampling from study centres in the South-east and South-south geopolitical zones in Nigeria constituted the sample. Two different questionnaires were used for data collection. Data was analyzed using means and percentage frequencies. Findings reveal that using practical demonstration, engagement with hands on activities and use of examples constitute the best practices for teaching science courses in open and distance learning mode as perceived by the facilitators. Availability of functional internet facilities, using practical demonstrations and availability of personal computers/laptops for tutorials are among the instructional modes that students perceive as best practices for learning science courses in open and distance learning . Facilitators and students perceive lack of well-equipped laboratory as a constraint to the attainment of best practices in the teaching and learning of science courses in open and distance. Recommendations were made based on the findings.
REFERENCES
1) Adewara, J.A., Adeleke, I.A. Ogundeji, R.K. & Ahani, E.B. (2010). Comparison of Academic Performance of Distance Learning Students and Full-Time Students in University of Lagos, American Journal of Business Education, Vol. 3(9) (Sept. 2010), p . 17-21
2) Ally, M. (2004). Foundations of Theory for Online Learning. In Terry Anderson and Fattil Elloumi (eds.) Theory and Practice of Online Learning, 1, 31, Athabasca University, Canada
3) Amita, N. & Vibha, J. (2007). Science Education through Open & Distance Learning at a Distance at Higher Education Level. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education. TOJDE Oct;2007, Vol. 6(4)
4) Anderson, T. (2007). “Reducing the Loneliness of the Distance Learner using Social Software” Keynote Address presented at the 2nd Cambridge International Conference on Open and Distance Learning, September, 2007, Cambridge, UK
5) Ani, C. I. (2015) Accessibility of Internet Services in Nigeria. In G. c. Unachukwu (Ed.), Dynamics of Access to Education in Nigeria. Awka; SCOA Heritage Ltd.
6) Ausubel, D.P. (1974). Educational Psychological Cognitive View. New York: Holt, Rineharm Winston
7) Boettcher, J. (2011). Ten Core Principles for Designing Effective Learning Environment: Insights from Brain Research and Pedagogical Theory Innovate, 3(3). FIschier School of Education and Human Services, Nova South-eastern University
8) Cavanaugh, C.S. (2001). The Effectiveness of Interactive Distance Education Technologies in K-12 Learning: A Meta-Analysis. International Journal of Educational Telecommunication, 7(1): 73-88
9) Chikuya, C. (2001). Teacher Education within the Context of Open and Distance Learning in Zimbabwe: A Case Study. Unpublished PhD Thesis, University of South Africa
10) Cimer, A. (2007). Effective Teaching in Science – A Review of Literature, Some of the Many Principles of Effective Teaching. Journal of Turkish Science Education, Vol. 4(1), p. 20-44
11) Crack, F.I. M. & Tulvang, E. (1975). Depth of Processing and the Retention of Words in Episodic Memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology, General, 104, 268-294
12) De Haro, S. (2020). Science and Philosophy: A-Love-Hate Relationship. Foundations of Science, Vol 25, p.297-314
13) Ezekannagha, G.N. (2007). Effects of Concept Mapping and Cognitive Styles on Achievement of Students in Integrated Science. Unpublished PhD. Thesis, University of Nigeria, Nsukka
14) Federal Government of Nigeria (2013). National Policy on Education, Sixth Edition. NERDC ,Press Abuja.
15) Freeman, R. (2004). Planning and Implementing Open and Distance Learning System: A Handbook for Decision Makers, Vancouver, Canada: The Commonwealth of Learning
16) Gary, U. (2004). A Comparison of Undergraduate Students Performance in Online and traditional Courses. Journal of Computing in Colleges, Vol. 19(4), p. 99-107
17) Garrison, R. (2000). Theoretical Challenges for Distance Education in the 21st Century: A Shift from Structural to Transactional Issues. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 1(1)
18) Goodrum, D. (2019). The Art of Teaching Science. 3rd Edition, Routledge eBook
19) Hodson, D. (2014). Learning Science, Learning about Science doing Science: Different Goals Demand Different Methods. International Journal of Science Education, 36(15); 2534-2553
20) Hong, K.S. (2002). Relationship between Students and Instructional Variables with Satisfaction from a Web-Based Course. Internet and Higher Education, 5, p.267-281
21) Inyang, W.E. (1993). Learning Theories: Implication for Science Teaching in Eshiet, I.J. (Ed). Methodology of Science Teaching. P.H. Tompson and Tompson
22) Iwasan, P.K. (2017). The Importance of Scientific Education and Technology. International Journal of Current Research, Vol. 9(06), P 53022-53023
23) Kandamby, G.W.T.C. (2019) Effectiveness of Laboratory Practical for Students’ Learning. International Journal for Innovation Education and Research. Vol.7(3).
24) Kleinman, J & Ertin, E.B. (2002). Comparison in Class and Distance Learning Students’ Performance and Attitudes in an Introductory Computer Science Class. Journal of Computing Sciences in Colleges, Vol. 17(6), p. 206-219
25) Landis, R.B. (2006). Comparison in Academic Performance between Distance Learning and Traditional On-Campus Students in Allied Health Care Education at the Medical College of Georgia (2006) (Electronic Thesis and Dissertation Paper, 283)
26) Mannan, M. A. (2018) Science and Subjectivity: Understanding Objectivity of Scientific Knowledge. Philosophy and Progress, Vol.59 (1-2), p.43-72
27) Miller, R. (2004). The Role of Practical Work in Teaching and Learning of Science. Retrieved www.i.nationalacademies.org.org/bose/miller_draftpaperjin04.pdf (Accessed Nov, 2021)
28) Mudasiru, O.Y. (2006). Problems and Prospects of Open and Distance Learning in Nigeria. Online Journal of Distance Education (TUJDE LSSN), Vol. 7(1) 2
29) Ngaruko, D.D., Saria, J.A. Jiwaji, N.T. (2012). Performance Determinants in Physical Sciences for ODL Undergraduate Students: the Case of Open University of Tanzania. Journal of the Open University of Tanzania, Vol. 13 (2).
30) National Open University of Nigeria: Getting to Know Your University, An Orientation and Information Guide for Students of National Open University of Nigeria. (Revised 2007) NOUN Publication.
31) NOUN PROFILE (2014) National Open University of Nigeria.
32) Nnaka, C.V. & Anaekwe M.C. (2017) Challenges of Teaching and Learning Science at a Distance in National Open University of Nigeria, In F. Maringe & E. Ojo (Eds.)Sustainable Transformation in African Higher education, p.189-201, Sense Publishers.
33) Nnaka C.V. (2016). Science Education through Open and Distance Learning at National Open University of Nigeria. International Journal of Library & Educational Science (1 ASET:IJLES), Vol. 2(1), p. 1-8
34) Nnaka, C. V. (2013) Availability and utilization of multimedia by open and distance learning students: The case of National Open University of Nigeria. East African Journal of Educational Research and Policy (EAJERP) Vol. 7. June 2013.
35) Nsiah, G.K.B. (2013). Best Practices – Distance Education: A Review. Creative Education, Vol 4 (12)
36) Offorma, G.C. (1994). Curriculum Implementation and Instruction. Onitsha Uniworld Educational Publishers (Nig.) Limited
37) Okeke, E.A.C. (2007). Making Science Education Accessible to All. 23rd Inaugural Lecture of the University of Nigeria, Nsukka, 9th August, 2007
38) Okeme, I. (2002). Science Teaching Concept, Principles and Methods. Usi Printers and Publishers Co. Ltd, Calabar
39) Owoyemi, T.E.and Akinsete, A.M.(2012) Learning Science at a Distance : National Open University of Nigeria Students’ Perception of Practical Work in Learning Science. Proceedings of EPISTEME :( 5) India. Retrievedfrom http:/episteme.hbese.trifr.res.in/index.php/episteme5/5/paper/view/85/8. Oct.15 2020
40) Rowe, C. (1994). Assessing the Effectiveness of Open Learning: The British Aerospace Experience. Industrial and Commercial Training, Vol. 4, p. 22-27
41) Rovai, A. (2002). Building Sense of Community at a Distance. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning. IRRODL, 3.1. Retrieved August 29, 2003 from http://www.irrodl.org.centent/v3.1/roval.pdf
42) Saykili, A. (2018). Distance Education: Definitions, Generations, Key Concepts and Future Directions. International Journal of Contemporary Education Research, Vol.5(1), 2-17.
43) Sean, M.B., Derek, J.M. & Richards T.W. (2002). Stack the Deck in Favour of your Students by using the Four Aces of Effective Teaching, Journal of Effective Teaching, Vol. 5(2), 2002
44) Skinner, B.F. (1974). About Behaviourism. New York: Knopt
45) Warner, C.K., Bell, C.V. & Odom, A.L. (2018). Defining Technology for Learning: Cognitive and Physical Tools of Inquiry, Middle Grades Review: Vol. 4(1), Article 2
46) Woodley, R. (2009). Practical Work in School Science – Why it is important? Retrieved from www.gettingpractical.org.uk/documents/SSRSSAT000.pdf (Accessed Nov. 2021)
47) Yao-Ting-Sung, Kuo-En Chang & Tzu-Chien Liu (2016). The Effects of Integrating Mobile Devices with Teaching and Learning on Students Learning Performance: A Meta-Analysis and Research Synthesis. Elsevier, Vol, 94, p. 252-275, March 2016
48) Zhao, Y., Lei, I., Yan, B. & Tan, S. (2004). What Makes the Difference? A Practical analysis of
49) Research on the Effectiveness of Distance Education. Available Online at http://ott.edu.msu.edu/literature/report/pdf