Yopi Gunawan

Faculty of Law, Universitas Singaperbangsa

DOI : https://doi.org/10.47191/ijsshr/v7-i01-113

Google Scholar Download Pdf
ABSTRACT

This research aims to analyze the regulations regarding policies for determining witnesses and reconstructing policies for determining justice collaborators in corruption cases. The type of research used is normative, using an approach to laws and other regulations. The nature of the research is descriptive, using secondary data. Research analysis was carried out qualitatively using a deductive method of conclusion. This research concludes that, in practice, various regulations regulate the policy of determining cooperating witnesses or justice collaborators in criminal acts of corruption. This regulation began with laws and then developed into Circulars and Joint Regulations from law enforcement agencies. Due to differences in rules, the policy for setting new standards had to be changed. This standard must legally bind recognition or recognition and the same understanding or perception regarding the status of cooperating perpetrator witnesses or justice collaborators from the examination stage at the investigation level to the examination stage at the court level, even to the examination stage at the court level.

KEYWORDS:

Justice Collaborator, Corruption, Law Enforcement, Justice.

REFERENCES
1) Ardi, M. K., Kamil, M. I., Triasari, D., & Rahmat, D. (2023). The imperative is to restrict customary criminal offenses after implementing Indonesia’s new criminal code. Wacana Hukum, 29(2), 130–145. https://doi.org/10.33061/wh.v29i2.9829

2) Aryani, E., & Triwanto. (2020). The Urgency of Granting Authority to Assess Corruption Justice Collaborators. Jurnal Bestuur, 8(1), 60–69. https://doi.org/10.20961/bestuur

3) Asriyani, A. (2018). Legal Protection of A Witness Cooperating Offender (Justice Collaborator) In Exposing The Criminal Acts of Corruption. IOSR Journal Of Humanities And Social Science (IOSR-JHSS, 23(2), 47–56. https://doi.org/10.9790/0837-2302124756

4) Bambang, J., Supeno, S. H., & Hum, M. (2017). RECONSTRUCTION OF CORRUPTION CRIMINAL IN INDONESIA. International Journal of Business, Economics and Law, 14(4), 82–95.

5) Chandra, T. Y., & Sriwidodo, J. (2023). DETERMINING A JUSTICE COLLABORATOR’S STATUS OF CORRUPTION: DISPARITIES CONSIDERATION OF INDONESIAN LAW ENFORCEMENT. Kanun Junal Imu Hukum, 25(1), 133–150. https://doi.org/10.24815/kanun.v25i1.28659

6) Gunarto, G., Ramadhan, M. Z. Y., & Wahyuningsih, S. E. (2023). Legal Reconstruction of False Statements in Corruption Case Pretrial as Quasi-Delict Based on Justice Value. Saudi Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences, 8(02), 27–32. https://doi.org/10.36348/sjhss.2023.v08i02.002

7) Haykal, H. (2023). Rekonstruksi Penegakan Sanksi Pidana Terhadap Justice Collaborator dalam Perspektif Kepastian Hukum dan Keadilan. Unes Law Review, 6(2), 4691–4700. https://doi.org/10.31933/unesrev.v6i2

8) Khoirunnisa, & Jubaidi, D. (2023). CRIMINAL LIABILITY FOR JUSTICE COLLABORATORS INVOLVED IN CORRUPTION CRIMES IN INDONESIA. Kanun Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 25(3), 491–506. https://doi.org/10.24815/kanun.v25i3.33822

9) Lintang, K., & Nugroho, S. (2021). Criminal Law Policy of Justice Collaborator in Corruption Crime Case. Law Reform, 17(1), 24–35.

10) Ma’ruf, U. (2019). Legal Reconstruction Of Laws Regarding Human Rights Through Judicial Review To The Constitutional Court. Legal Reconstruction in Indonesia Based on Human Right Anual Program of International Conference, 11–24.

11) Namang, S. L., Tungga, I. A., & Resopijani, A. (2023). THE EFFECTIVENESS OF THE APPLICATION OF SUPREME COURT CIRCULAR LETTER (SEMA) NO. 4 OF 2011 AND LAW NO. 31 OF 2014 RELATED TO THE DETERMINATION OF WITNESSES WHO COOPERATE (JUSTICE COLLABORATORS) IN INDONESIAN COURTS IN AN EFFORT TO TACKLE ORGANIZED CRIME. Indonesian Journal of Law, 1(3), 63–83. www.jurnalhukumonline.com

12) Purwadi, H. (2021). THE EXISTENCE OF JUSTICE COLLABORATOR IN FASTENING THE ERADICATION OF CORRUPTION CRIME IN INDONESIA. PSYCHOLOGY AND EDUCATION, 58(1), 1828–1835. www.psychologyandeducation.net

13) Romdoni, M., & Bakar, A. P. A. (2022). The Role of the Justice Collaborator in A Premeditated Murder Crime. Legal Brief, 12(5), 3033–3041. https://doi.org/10.35335/legal

14) Setiyono, S., Wahid, E., & Suka’arsana, I. K. (2023). Policy Reconstruction towards Justice Collaborator Determination of Corruption Cases based on Legal Certainty and Benefits Aspects. International Journal of Social Service and Research, 3(1), 270–276. https://doi.org/10.46799/ijssr.v3i1.247

15) Sholecha, E. M., Saiful, A., Yunika, S., Hariyanto, & Unsil, N. (2023). Justice Collaborator’s Position and Function on Witness Protection’s Rights as a Suspect from the Perspective of Criminal Law in Indonesia. Volksgeist: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Dan Konstitusi, 6(1), 131–143. https://doi.org/10.24090/volksgeist.v6i1.7246

16) Sriwidodo, J. (2016). The Implementation of Gijzeling in Solving Tax Corruption Cases in Indonesia. Scientific Research Journal (SCIRJ), IV(I), 50–57. www.scirj.org

17) Thalib, H., Rahman, S., & Semendawai, A. H. (2017). THE ROLE OF JUSTICE COLLABORATOR IN UNCOVERING CRIMINAL CASES IN INDONESIA. Diponegoro Law Review, 02(01), 1–16.

18) Widowaty, Y., Purwanto, H., Savitri, N., & Setiawan, A. (2023). Reconstruction of Legal Protection of Justice Collaborators in Narcotic Criminal Cases. E3S Web of Conferences, 440, 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202344004017

Volume 07 Issue 01 January 2024