January 2024

Volume 07 Issue 01 January 2024
Confidential Property of Corruption Convictions According to Law Number 20 of 2001 Concerning the Eradication of Criminal Acts of Corruption
1Rahmat Muhajirin, 2Winda Agustina Wahyuni, 3Angga Bayu Saputra, 4Joko Nur Sariono
1,2,3Magister of Law, Faculty of Law, Wijaya Kusuma Surabaya University
4Faculty of Law, Wijaya Kusuma Surabaya, University
DOI : https://doi.org/10.47191/ijsshr/v7-i01-68

Google Scholar Download Pdf
ABSTRACT

The article entitled Confiscation of Assets of Corruption Convicts According to Law Number 20 of 2001 concerning the Eradication of Corruption Crimes with a problem formulation and research objectives: How to Confiscate the Assets of Corruption Convicts According to Law Number 20 of 2001 concerning the Eradication of Corruption Crimes. The approach method used is normative juridical research, and uses a statutory approach and a conceptual approach. Produce conclusions: In practice, the execution of decisions is often difficult for prosecutors to confiscate the assets of corruption convicts and the payment of replacement money as intended in the Anti-Corruption Eradication Law, so that there are often arrears in payments in efforts to recover State losses. One reason is that the court decisions are not detailed. The Supreme Court (MA) in many decisions only stated "imposing compensation in the amount of..." without including the duration (term) of subsidiary imprisonment as a way to force the defendant to return the money to the State.

KEYWORDS:

treasure; convicted of corruption; foreclosure

REFERENCES
1) Criminal Law Code

2) Criminal Procedure Code

3) Law Number 20 of 2001 concerning Amendments to Law Number 31 of 1999 concerning Eradication of Corruption Crimes.

4) Achmad Ali, 2009, Menguak Teory Hukum (Legal Theory) dan Teori Peradilan (Judicial Prudence), Jakarta: Prenada Media Group.

5) Aga Wiranata, 2014, KENDALA JAKSA DALAM EKSEKUSI PIDANA TAMBAHAN UANG PENGGANTI PADA PERKARA TINDAK PIDANA KORUPSI (Studi Kasus Korupsi Di Kejaksaan Tinggi Jawa-Timur). Brawijaya Law Student Journal, 1(2).

6) Ahmad, 2013, Pengertian dan Ruang Lingkup Keuangan Negara, http://rakaraki.blogspot.com/2014/04/pengertian-dan-ruang-lingkup-keuangan.html, access 25 Mei 2019.

7) Aziz Syamsuddin, 2001, Tindak Pidana Khusus, Jakarta: Sinar Grafika.

8) Chaerudin, dkk, 2009, Strategi Pencegahan & Penegakan Hukum Tindak Pidana Korupsi, Bandung: Refika Aditama.

9) Indriyanto Seno Adji, 2001, Korupsi dan Hukum Pidana, Jakarta: Kantor Pengacara & Konsultasi Hukum “Prof. Oemar Seno Adji, SH & Rekan”.

10) Jawade Hafidz Arsyad, 2013, Korupsi dalam Perspektif HAN (Hukum Administrasi Negara), Jakarta: Sinar Grafika.

11) Mungki Hadipratikto, Artikel Eksekusi Putusan Pidana Uang Pengganti Dalam Perkara Tindak Pidana Korupsi, portalgaruda.org/article.php?article=33512&val=2342, access 25 Mei 2019.

12) Musri Nauli, Kerugian Keuangan Negara Dalam Tindak Pidana Korupsi,

13) http://hukum.kompasiana.com/2014/10/08/kerugian-negara-dalam-tindak-pidana-korupsi2013- access 25 Mei 2019.

14) Satjipto Rahardjo, 2006, Ilmu Hukum, Bandung: Citra Aditya Bhakti.

15) Surachmin dan Suhandi Cahaya, Strategi & Teknik Korupsi, Mengetahui Untuk Mencegah, Jakarta: Sinar Grafika.
Volume 07 Issue 01 January 2024

Indexed In

Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar