VOlUME 05 ISSUE 04 APRIL 2022
1Ahmad Taufiq, 2Moh. Fadli, 3Fadillah Putra, 4Nurul Badriyah
1,2,3,4Posgraduate Program of Universitas Brawijaya Malang, Veteran Street , Ketawanggede, Lowokwaru, Malang City, East Java, 65145
Google Scholar Download Pdf
ABSTRACT
According to the definition of Law No. 10 of 1992, family planning is no longer just a matter of birth control but is more broadly related to issues of family resilience and welfare. The discourse of social policy decentralization has become a global discourse in the last two decades. Decentralization has produced many well-targeted policies, including family-based development. Pasuruan Regency has a fairly strategic policy, where environmental issues become a substantial aspect of family sustainability. Various programs are offered that lead to aspects of family-based development and community survival. So that in this research it will be interesting if there is a decentralized implementation model of social policy that sees the family as the direct beneficiary target. So that the gap between the ideals of family policy and family welfare is not only expected to be answered with the implementation of social policy decentralization but is also expected to be more targeted if the beneficiaries are families. This seems like wanting to place the family as a measure of development success. This makes it necessary to pay attention to Pasuruan Regency government policies in implementing social policy decentralization with an emphasis on family-based development policies that have a positive effect on family welfare and resilience in Pasuruan Regency.
KEYWORDS:Family, Social Investment, Policy Decentralization, Environment.
REFERENCES
1) Belanawane, Muhammad S. 2016. “neoliberalism: conceptual genealogy, its relevance and implication to modern social policy”. Sosio Informa 2 (03): 291-313
2) De Waal, T. (2020). Conditional belonging: Evaluating integration requirements from a social equality perspective. Journal of Intercultural Studies, 41(2), 231-247.
3) Desai, Falguni P. 2013. “Ecology Journeying: Discovering Ecology As Integral Part Of Human Living.” International Journal of Advance Research 1(8).
4) Gkargkavouzi, A., Halkos, G., & Matsiori, S. (2019). Environmental behavior in a private-sphere context: Integrating theories of planned behavior and value belief norm, self-identity and habit. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 148, 145-156.
5) Gottfried, A. E. (2021). Maternal Employment in the Family Setting: Developmental and Environmental Issues 1. In Employed mothers and their children (pp. 63-84). Routledge.
6) Hall, C. M. (2019). Constructing sustainable tourism development: The 2030 agenda and the managerial ecology of sustainable tourism. Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 27(7), 1044-1060.
7) Hemerijck, A. (2018). Social investment as a policy paradigm. Journal of European public policy, 25(6), 810-827.
8) Hemerijck, Anton. 2018. “Social Investment and Its Critics”, dalam Anton Hemerijck (ed). The Uses of Social Investment. Oxford: Oxford University Press: 43-50
9) Hsu, A., Höhne, N., Kuramochi, T., Vilariño, V., & Sovacool, B. K. (2020). Beyond states: Harnessing sub-national actors for the deep decarbonisation of cities, regions, and businesses. Energy Research & Social Science, 70, 101738.
10) Lee, S. S. Y., & Baek, S. H. (2018). The social investment approach in the productivist welfare regime: the unfolding of social investment in South Korea and Japan. In Handbook of Family Policy. Edward Elgar Publishing.
11) Nugroho, Riant. 2018. Kebijakan Sosial untuk Negara Berkembang. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar
12) Olssen, M. (2021). Social Democracy, Complexity and Education: Perspectives from the Writings of John Atkinson Hobson and John Maynard Keynes. In A Normative Foucauldian (pp. 266-280). Brill.
13) Opielka, Michael. 2017. “Family and the Welfare State - Social Ecological Perspectives”, Journal of Human Ecology, 8:5, 305-328, DOI: 10.1080/09709274.1997.11907295.
14) Peng, I. (2009). The political and social economy of care in the Republic of Korea. Geneva: United Nations Research Institute for Social Development.
15) Pisani, E., Olivier Kok, M., & Nugroho, K. (2017). Indonesia's road to universal health coverage: a political journey. Health policy and planning, 32(2), 267-276.
16) Puspitawati, Herien. 2018. Ekologi Keluarga: Konsep Dan Lingkungan Keluarga. Edisi Revisi. Bogor: Penerbit IPB Press.
17) Putra, F., & Aminuddin, M. F. (2020). Democracy and Social Policy in Southeast Asia: A Comparative Process Tracing Analysis. Jurnal Politik, 5(2), 221-258.
18) Putri, A. C., & Viverita, V. (2019). Risk preference of founder and descendant of Indonesian family firms. Polish Journal of Management Studies, 20.
19) Ringle, C. M., Sarstedt, M., Mitchell, R., & Gudergan, S. P. (2020). Partial least squares structural equation modeling in HRM research. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 31(12), 1617-1643.
20) Septiyana, I. (2019). The Involvement of Indonesian Civil Society Organizations in the Policy-Making Process of Migrant Workers Protection in ASEAN. Journal of Indonesian Social Sciences and Humanities, 9(1), 1-19.
21) Setiyono, Budi. 2018. Model & Desain Negara Kesejahteraan. Bandung: Penerbit Nuansa Cendekia.
22) Smock, P. J., & Schwartz, C. R. (2020). The demography of families: A review of patterns and change. Journal of Marriage and Family, 82(1), 9-34.
23) Spicker, P. (2014). Social policy: Theory and practice. Policy Press.
24) Talitha, Tessa, Tommy Firman and Delik Hudalah. 2019. “Welcoming Two Decades Of Decentralization In Indonesia: A Regional Development Perspective”. Territory, Politics, Governance, DOI: 10.1080/21622671.2019.1601595.
25) Vanham, D., Leip, A., Galli, A., Kastner, T., Bruckner, M., Uwizeye, A., ... & Hoekstra, A. Y. (2019). Environmental footprint family to address local to planetary sustainability and deliver on the SDGs. Science of the Total Environment, 693, 133642.
26) Wu, H., Li, Y., Hao, Y., Ren, S., & Zhang, P. (2020). Environmental decentralization, local government competition, and regional green development: Evidence from China. Science of the total environment, 708, 135085