September 2022

VOlUME 05 ISSUE 09 SEPTEMBER 2022
The role of Toponyms in cultural heritage preservation: A case of Lubukusu Toponyms in Kimilili Sub County, Bungoma County.
1Milkah Nasimiyu Namunguba,2Dr. Anashia Nancy Ong’onda
1Department of Languages and Humanities School of Social Sciences Mount Kenya University
2Senior Lecturer,Department of Languages and Linguistics,School of Humanities and Social Sciences,Machakos University, Kenya
DOI : https://doi.org/10.47191/ijsshr/v5-i9-27

Google Scholar Download Pdf
ABSTRACT

Names are an essential part of human existence since almost every real object, from man himself to the objects of nature, has its own name. Names of places in linguistics are known as toponyms. Toponyms play a multidimensional role in the society be it geographically, historically or sociocultural. Thus, toponyms have caught the attention of researchers since they offer a wide range of research from form to motivation. This paper analyses Lubukusu toponyms from a social cultural context. The paper aims at showing how toponyms are embedded in cultural and historical features of Bukusu people. The study applied Tent and Blair’s (2011, 2014) toponymic typology theoretical framework. The study employed a descriptive research design and more so ethnography. The place names analyzed were observed from various sources such streets which were later interpreted through interviews and focused group discussions. The findings of the study show that Lubukusu toponyms remain important cultural sources and spatial records of past generations. Therefore, toponyms play a significant role in preserving the identity of the local population and as such, they are also an important part of the cultural heritage.

KEYWORDS:

Toponyms, Culture, Lubukusu language, Bukusu people

REFERENCES

1) Angogo, R. (1980). Linguistic and attitudinal factors in the maintenance of Luhya group identity. PhD Dissertation. Austin: University of Texas.

2) Baker, R, and Carmony, M. (1975). Indiana place names. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

3) Cano L, R. (2008). Toponymic analysis of Lienzos from the Mixtec lowlands. Oaxaca.

4) Crystal, D. (2003). The Cambridge Encyclopedia of the English Language. (2nd ed) Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

5) Diercks, M. (2010). Agreement with subjects in Lubukusu. PhD dissertation. Georgetown University.

6) Glaser R (1998). Australian toponymy in the light of socio-onomastics. In Nicolaisen, W. F. H (ed) Scope, perspectives and methods of onomastics, vol 2, Aberdeen. University of Aberdeen pp.133-140.

7) Guthrie, M. (1967). The classification of Bantu languages. London: Dawson of PallMall.

8) Kothari, C.R (2004). Research Methods & Technologies. New Delhi: New Age International Publishers.

9) Lewis, M. (Ed.) (2009). Ethnologue: language of the world, 16th ed.SIL International Dallas. Online version: http://www.ethnologue.com/

10) Mencken, H.L. (1967 [1921]). The American Language: An Inquiry into the Development of English in the United States. Abridged Edition. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.

11) Mestherie, R., Swan J., Deumart, A. & Leap, W. (2000). Introducing sociolinguistics. Edinburg University Press.

12) Mutonyi, N. (1996). Tense, Aspect, and Bukusu Verb Tones. OSU Working Papers in Linguistics 47.77- 110.

13) Nuessel, F. (1992). The Study of Names. Greenwood Press: Connecticut

14) Radding L, Western, J. (2010). What’s in a name? Linguistics, geography and toponyms. In: The geographical review, Vol 3, New York. American geographical society pp.394-412.

15) Ritchie, J. L.and G. Elam. 2003. “Designing and selecting samples”. In J. Ritchie & J. Lewis (eds.).Qualitative Research Practice: A Guide for Social Science Students and Researchers. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, pp. 77-108.

16) Rosenhouse, J. (2002). Personal names in Hebrew and Arabic: Modern trends compared

17) to the past. Journal of Semetic Studies, XLVII (1), 97-114.

18) Smith G (1996). Amerindian place names: A typology based on naming and form. Onomastica Canadiana, 78:53-64.

19) Stewart, G. R. (1975). Names on the globe. New York: Oxford University Press.

20) Tent J, Blair D (2011). Motivations in naming: the development of a toponymic typology for Australian place names. Names 59:67-89.

21) Tent, J. and D. Blair. 2014. Motivations for Naming: A Toponymic Typology . ANPS Technical Paper No. 2. Revised online edition. South Turramurra, NSW: Placenames Australia for the Australian National Placenames Survey.

22) UNESCO (2003). Convention for Safeguarding of the Intangible Cultural Heritage, Paris.

VOlUME 05 ISSUE 09 SEPTEMBER 2022

Indexed In

Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar