December 2023

Volume 06 Issue 12 December 2023
A Multisite Study on the Governance of Rural Labor-Intensive Programs Post Pandemic Covid -19
1Fujiyanti, 2Dyah Sawitri, 3Sugeng Mulyono
1Master of Management, Postgraduate, Universitas Gajayana Malang
2,3Postgraduate lecturer, Universitas Gajayana Malang
DOI : https://doi.org/10.47191/ijsshr/v6-i12-37

Google Scholar Download Pdf
ABSTRACT

Good governance in implementing rural intensive projects is a necessity if you hope that project objectives can be achieved effectively and efficiently. Several indicators to measure good governance include: community participation, transparency and effectiveness. The aim of this research is to examine in depth the implementation of cash-intensive project governance and its indicators using a qualitative approach. This multisite research was conducted in Bening Village, Ngembat Village and Tawar Village, Gondang District, Mojokerto Regency, East Java Province, Indonesia. The sampling technique uses snowball sampling where existing subjects provide references to recruit the required sample. In this technique an individual subject provides information about only one other subject and then the chain continues with only one reference from one subject. This pattern is continued until the subjects available as samples are deemed to have met the requirements. The results of this research conclude that the principles of good governance have been implemented in village cash-intensive project activities. The principles of community participation, transparency, accountability and target accuracy have been implemented consistently in project governance. However, it is still found that the competence of project implementers is inadequate so that development work is not completed on time. For this reason, in order for cash-intensive projects to be on target, effective and on time, good and measurable management mechanisms are required.

KEYWORDS:

Community participation, Transparency, Effectiveness, Labor intensive

REFERENCES
1) Arifin, I. (2009). Good Governance dan Pembangunan Daerah dalam Bingkai Nilai Lokal sebuah Study Birokrasi dan Perubahan Sosial Politik di Kabupaten Wajo. Jurnal Administrasi dan Kebijakan Kesehatan Indonesia, 2(1), 63-80.

2) Bogdan, R.C., Biklen, S.K.1982. Qualitative research for education:anintroduction to theory and method. Boston: Allyn and Bacon. Inc

3) Fajarwati, A., & Rahmadila, U. (2022). Model Implementasi Kebijakan Merilee Grindle (Studi Kasus Penyerapan Tenaga Kerja Lokal Pada PT. Meiji Rubber Indonesia Kabupaten Bekasi). Dialog: Jurnal Ilmu Komunikasi Dan Studi Media, 7(1), 124–133.

4) Herman, C. T., & Ad’n, S. Z. (2021). Meningkatkan Ekonomi Keluarga Desa Wedi, Kecamatan Gedangan, Kabupaten Sidoarjo. Jurnal Abdi Bhayangkara UBHARA Surabaya, 3(1), 963– 969.

5) Jonhstoon, Michael. (2003). Good Governance: Rule of Law, Transparency, and Accountability. UNDP.

6) Kemendagri. (2014). Perkembangan Paradigma Good Governance. Retrieved from Kementerian Dalam Negeri: http://www.kemendagri.go.id/article/2014/06/12/ perkembangan paradigma-good-governance

7) Menteri Desa. (2016). Peraturan Menteri Desa, Pembangunan Daerah, dan Transmigrasi Republik Indonesia Nomor 2 Tahun 2016 tentang Indeks Desa Membangun.

8) Moleong, Lexy. (2014). Metode Penelitian Kualitatif , Edisi Revisi. Bandung: PT Remaja Rosdakarya.

9) Manullang. (2012). Dasar-Dasar Manajemen Bagi Pimpinan Perusahaan. Jakarta: Gajah Mada Press.

10) Putra, et al. (2017). Akuntabilitas dan Transparansi Pengelolaan Alokasi Dana Desa. e-Journal S1 Ak Universitas Pendidikan Ganesha. 8 (2), 1-11.

11) Sarfan Tabo et al. (2022). Penataan Kelembagaan Dalam Mewujudkan Good Governance Pada SKB Kabupaten Bome Bolango. PUBLIK: Jurnal Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia, Adminsitrasi dan Pelayanan Publik Universitas Bina Taruna Gorontalo, IX (1), 64-74.

12) Steers, R. M. (1997). Organizational Effectiveness: A Behavioral View (Goodyear Series in Management and Organizations). Santa Monica: Goodyear Publishing Company.

13) Solekhan, M. (2014). Penyelenggaraan Pemerintah Desa. Malang: Setara Press.

14) Sedarmayanti. (2004). Good Governance (Kepemerintahan Yang Baik). Bandung: Mandar Maju.

15) Siagian. S.P. (2014). Teori Administrasi Publik. Bandung: Alfabeta.

16) Sumodiningrat, G. (2004). Otonomi Daerah dalam Penanggulangan Kemiskinan. Jakarta: Impac.

17) Tan, Q. (2010). Why Village Election Has Not Much Improved Village Governance. Journal of Chinese Political Science. 15(2), 153-167

18) Taufiq, O. H., Yuliani, D., & Hermawandi, D. (2019). Tata Kelola Pemerintah Desa Berbasis E-Government Menuju Good Governance. Dinamika: Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Administrasi Negara, 6(1), 145-152.

19) Terry, George.R, (1977). Principles of Management, Ontario: Richard D. Irwin (INC. Homewood, Irwin-Dorsey Limited Georgetown.

20) Wibawa, K. S. (2019). Urgensi Keterbukaan Informasi dalam Pelayanan Publik sebagai Upaya Mewujudkan Tata Kelola Pemerintahan yang Baik. Adm. Law Gov. J, 2(2), 218-234.

21) Zuliyah, S. (2010). Strategi Pemberdayaan Masyarakat Desa dalam Menunjang Pembangunan Daerah. Journal of Rural and Development, 1(2), 151–160.
Volume 06 Issue 12 December 2023

Indexed In

Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar