VOlUME 06 ISSUE 08 AUGUST 2023
1Maria Teresa Naa, 2Agustinus Hary Setyawan
1,2Universitas Mercu Buana Yogyakarta
DOI : https://doi.org/10.47191/ijsshr/v6-i8-26Google Scholar Download Pdf
ABSTRACT
The research was applying qualitative method and instruments to collect data such as reading text which consisted of some words, phrases and sentences. Collecting data carried out by recording twenty students English reading. The students were at the eleventh grade of SMA Negeri 1 Ayamaru, Maybrat Regency, Southwest Papua Province. The student records were used for analyzing English speech sound in both aspects segmental and suprasegmental of the students’ pronunciation. The result of students record exposed the difference between the students English speech sound and the recognizable English speech sound in English standard variety. It was found that the differences were revealed in vowel sounds and was sounded by the students in English single syllable words. The suprasegmental features were different represented by the student speech sound either in words stress, phonemic stressed, length, loudness and intonation or the pitch / tone and sounds inserted and gliding into single syllable segment.
KEYWORDS:Influence, Maybrat Accent, Pronunciation, Segmental, Suprasegmental
REFERENCES
1) Brown W.U. (1975) • Cited by 15 — Voorhoeve A quantitative Phonology of Maybrat Cenderawasih University and Summer Institute of Linguistics
2) Canbera A.C. T: Dept.of Linguistic, Research school of pacific studies, 1991. Australian National University.
3) Cross, David. A Practical Handbook of Language Teaching.
4) Daniel, Jones. (1986) The Pronunciation of English. Cambridge University Press.
5) D.M. Daly, Papers in Linguistics 3:4 pp. 606–610, Univ. of Texas (1991) and L.W. Martin. Univ. of Iowa, Univ. of Iowa, London: Cassell.
6) Dutton Tom, ed. Papers in Papuan Linguistics, (1991). No.1, 1 -27. Pacific Linguistics, A-73, © William U. Brown.
7) Fry, D. B. (1958). Experiments in the perception of stress. Language and Speech, 1, 126-152. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/002383095800100207
8) Grimes, Barbara F. (1984) Languages of the world ethnologue. Dallas, Texas: Wycliffe Bible Translators. 1984
9) Hussain, Shafaat and Sumaiya Sajid. (2015) Applications of Suprasegmental in EFL Classroom: A Short Review. International Journal of Scientific and Research Publications, Volume 5, Issue 9, pp. 1-7.
10) Harmer J. The Practice of English Language Teaching (2007). Fourth Edition. United Kingdom. Pearson Education.
11) Jones,Daniel, . (1986) The Pronounciation of English. New York: Cambridge University Press.
12) Kelly, G. (2000). How to teach pronunciation. Bluestone Press, Charlbury, Oxfordshire, UK.
13) Ladefoged, P. (1993) A Course in Phinetics. Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, Inc
14) Morley, J. A (1994) Multidimensional Curriculum Design for Speech-pronunciation Instruction. In J. Morley (Ed.), Pronunciation Theory and Pedagogy: New Views, New Directions. Alexandria, VA: TESOL.
15) Paulston, C. B., and Bruder, M. N. (1976). Teaching English as a Second Language: Techniques and Procedures. Massachusetts: Winthrop Publishers. Inc
16) R.L. Trask. (1995) A Dictionary of Phonetics and Phonology. London and New York.
17) Richards, J., J. Platt. (1999) Longman Dictionary of Language Teaching and Applied Linguistics. Harlow: pearson Education.
18) Roach, P. (2009) English phonetics and phonology: a practical course. Cambridge University Press.
19) Sanjoko Johanis. (2019). Kumpulan Berita Balai Bahasa /Antara. Balai Bahasa Provinsi Papua dan Papua Barat.
20) Tom Dutton, ed. (1991). Papers in Papuan Linguistics, No.1, 1 -27. Pacific Linguistics, A-73, © William U. Brown
21) Wardhaugh Ronald (2006). An Introduction to Sociolinguistics. London: lackwell Publishing Ltd