September 2023

Volume 06 Issue 09 September 2023
The Utilization of Cultural Artifacts Used in Business Activities Reviewed from Intellectual Property Rights Regulations in Indonesia
1Hilda Octavia Isnaini, 2Kholis Roisah
1,2Diponegoro University Jl. Imam Bardjo, S.H. No 1-3 Pleburan, Semarang City, Indonesia
DOI : https://doi.org/10.47191/ijsshr/v6-i9-46

Google Scholar Download Pdf
ABSTRACT

The utilization of cultural artifacts used in business activities requires an utilization permit from The Department of Tourism or The Ministry of Education, Culture, Research, and Technology. In utilizing them, legal protection is necessary to ensure the protection of human rights. Permission to utilize cultural artifacts is mandatory, and sanctions will imposed. This research uses the doctrinal approach by analyzing secondary data, especially about intellectual property rights regulations. The results of this research conclude that to utilize cultural artifacts in business activities requires permission from the Department of Tourism or The Ministry of Education, Culture, Research, and Technology. Utilizing cultural artifacts in business activities ruled by Articles No. 32-38 of Law No. 5 of 2017 on Cultural Advancement and Article No. 33 of Government Regulation No. 56 of 2022 on Communal Intellectual Property. Those articles discussed that any person who wants to utilize cultural artifacts has to get permission from the minister above, otherwise will get administrative sanctions. The mentioned administrative sanctions include verbal warnings, written warnings, administrative fines, temporary cessation of activities, and revocation of permits.

KEYWORDS:

Cultural artifacts, Commercial, Intellectual Property Rights

REFERENCES

1) Diah Imaningrum Susanti, Raymundus I Made Sudhiarsa, Rini Susrujani. 2019. Traditional Cultural Expression and Intellectual Property Rights. Malang: Duima Publisher. Page 190.

2) Philipus M. Hadjon. 1987. Legal Protection for Indonesia’s People. Surabaya: Build Knowledge. Page 30

3) Satjipto Raharjo. 2000. Legal Studies. Bandung: Limited Liability Company. Citra Aditya Bakti. Page 74

4) Agus Ari Munandar. 2013. ARTIFACTS IN GEOGRAPHIC SPACE: Artifact Studies in Historical Geography. History and Culture. Vol. 7. No. 2.

5) Ayu Citra Santyaningtyas. 2020. Strategies for The Protection of Traditional Cultural Expressions in Indonesia. Heritage Journal. Vol. 8 No. 1.

6) Indah Nur Fitriani and Moch. Arifien, Juhadi. 2018. The Phenomenon of Indonesia’s Outermost Small Islands and Administrative Territories (Book Nontextual Supplement for Social Science Learning in Junior High School. Edu Geography. Vol. 6 No. 1.

7) Mugia Bayu Raharja. 2017. Fertility by Ethnicity in Indonesia: Analysis of 2010 Population Census Data. Journal of Indonesia’s Population. Vol 12 No. 1

8) Government Regulations No. 56 of 2022 on Communal Intellectual Property

9) Article No. 1 of Law No. 31 of 2000 on Industry Design

10) Article No. 8 of Law No. 28 of 2014 on Copyright.

11) Law No. 5 of 2017 on The Advancement of Culture

12) Law No. 11 of 2010 on Cultural Conservation and Government Regulation No. 1 of 2022 on the National Register and Preservation of Cultural Conservation.

13) Communal Intellectual Property. 2022. Traditional Cultural Expression. https://www.dgip.go.id/menu-utama/kikomunal/pengenalan.

14) From @bakpiatugujogja/X

15) People’s Cabinet. 2023. Cultural Entrepeneurs Inspiring Local Artifacts Are… https://kabinetrakyat.com/wirausahakerajinan-inspirasi-artefak-budaya-lokal-adalah/.

16) The Ministry of Industry of the Republic of Indonesia. 2015. https://www.kemenperin.go.id/artikel/12064/TigaKeunggulan-Produk-Berbasis-Budaya
Volume 06 Issue 09 September 2023

Indexed In

Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar