January 2024

Volume 07 Issue 01 January 2024
Weaknesses of Household Waste Management Arrangements in Yogyakarta
1Rudi Hartono, 2Dr. H. Rhiti, SH., LL.M.
1Master of Law Student, Universitas Atma Jaya Yogyakarta, Yogyakarta
2Lecturer at the Faculty of Law, Universitas Atma Jaya Yogyakarta, Yogyakarta
DOI : https://doi.org/10.47191/ijsshr/v7-i01-114

Google Scholar Download Pdf
ABSTRACT

Waste is often a big problem in the environment, especially waste from households. The increasing amount of waste is caused by every human activity which is increasingly numerous and complex. Waste management is considered unsuccessful in Yogyakarta society, especially household waste. Seeing how waste management is not yet good in Yogyakarta requires a more comprehensive study of the applicable regulations so that they can be implemented or not. The formulation of the research problem is what are the legal factors that cause weak household waste management regulations in Yogyakarta. This research applies normative research which uses exploratory technical settings by concentrating on social cases seen from the perspective of norms and facts regarding current problems. Collecting information uses library research methods by using information sources starting from the main important materials, namely Law Number 18 of 2008 concerning waste management, Yogyakarta City Regional Regulation Number 1 of 2022. Lawrence Meir Friedman has the main ideas in his book The Legal System A Social Science Perspective, one of which is that the legal system consists of components, namely structure (legal structure), substance (legal substance), and culture (Legal Culture). Based on the written analysis, it is clear that regulations in waste management, both in the central and regional governments of the city of Yogyakarta, are still lacking in terms of unclear management arrangements, in more detail the process arrangements, disposal arrangements, arrangements for sorting and processing waste independently are not explained in detail, which causes people to remain with the idea that waste can simply be sorted and then thrown into final disposal.

KEYWORDS:

Social, Management, Household Waste, Yogyakarta.

REFERENCES
1) Law No. 18 of 2018 concerning Waste Management

2) Regulation of the Governor of the Special Region of Yogyakarta Province Number 16 of 2021 concerning Amendments to the Regulation of the Governor of DIY Number 123 of 2018 concerning DIY Virtues and Strategies in Managing Household

3) Waste and Waste Similar to Household Waste

4) Yogyakarta City Regional Regulation Number 1 of 2022

5) Cecep, Dani Sucipto. 2012. Waste Recycling Processing Technology. Semarang: Gosyen Publishing

6) Regional Regulation Number 3 of 2015 concerning Environmental Protection and Management

7) Kusminah, Imah Luluk. Counseling on 4R (Reduce, Reuse, Recycle, Replace) and the Use of Waste Banks as Steps to Create a Clean and Economical Environment in Mojowuku Village, Gresik Regency. Journal of Community Service LPPM Untag Surabaya

8) Sugiarti, Rara, and Istianggaranul Aliyah. 2015. Community-Based Waste Management Culture Using the 5R Method to Create a Clean and Healthy Environment in Sukoharjo Regency. UNS Cakra Wisata Journal

9) Asti M. S. and Sulistyawati. (2014). The existence of Legal TPS and Illegal TPS in Godean District, Sleman Regency. Journal of Public Health

10) Mulasari A., Heru H. A., & Muhadjir N. (2016). Analysis of the Situation of the Yogyakarta City Waste Problem and Policies for Handling It. Journal of Public Health
Volume 07 Issue 01 January 2024

Indexed In

Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar Avatar