Volume 07 Issue 01 January 2024
1Saverius Vanny Noviandri Prasetya Manaan, 2Maria Christina Dimalouw, 3W Riawan Tjandra
1,2Students of Magister of Law, Faculty of Law, Universitas Atma Jaya Yogyakarta, Indonesia
3Lecturer of Faculty of Law, Universitas Atma Jaya Yogyakarta, Indonesia
DOI : https://doi.org/10.47191/ijsshr/v7-i01-27Google Scholar Download Pdf
ABSTRACT
The authority of the administration to respond to and issue a decision within a certain period of time, and if the predetermined conditions are not met, or the Official and/or Government Agency may ignore it, or silence it, the citizen's request for the issuance of a decision/action is considered to have been granted. This is what is known as a fictitious positive decision or tacit authorization in the UUAP (Administrative Government Law), which still requires review and alignment with previous legal provisions, namely the concept of fictitious negative, after the enactment of Law Number 6 of 2023 on Job Creation. This paper attempts to explain and harmonize fictitious positive and fictitious negative decisions after the enactment of Law Number 6 of 2023 on Job Creation (UUCK).
KEYWORDS:Legal Uncertainty, Positive Fictitious Application, Law
REFERENCES1) Ananda. (2021). Theory of Legal Certainty According to Experts. Gramedia Blog, 1.
2) Arfiana, FahmibKhairul, ArrasulicBeni, dIndah, & FikriMiftahul. (2022). Law Enforcement in Accordance with the Principles of a Justice that is Certain, Fair and Humane: Monitoring Study of the Law Enforcement Process in 2020. Riau Law Journal, 61.
3) Aris Mohamad, TambunanEzra, PutriDita, & NugrahaXavier. (2022). Application of General Principles of Good Government in the Implementation of Public Services in Correctional Institutions. Journal of Litigation, 263.
4) Desy Wulandari. (2020). Testing of Positive Fictitious Decisions in State Administrative Courts. Lex Renaissance 5, 32-33.
5) Fauzani Muhammad, & Rohman Fandi. (2019). Problematic Settlement of Disputes on Unlawful Acts by Authorities in the Indonesian Administrative Court (Critical Study of Supreme Court Regulation Number 2 of 2019. Journal of Widya Pranata Hukum, Vol 2 Number 1 February, 19-20.
6) Indroharto. (2015). Efforts to Understand the Law Concerning State Administrative Courts: Book II Proceedings in State Administrative Courts. Jakarta: Sinar Harapan Library.
7) Ishaq. (2020). Legal Research Methods. Bandung: Alpha Beta.
8) Marbun. (2018). State Administrative Law 1. 368- 369.
9) Pratama Surya. (2020). New Arrangements for Positive Fictitious Decisions in Law Number 11 of 2020 concerning Job Creation and Its Relation to PTUN Competency. Rechts Vinding, 1.
10) PratiwiCekli, PurnamawatiShinta, Fauzi, & PurbawatiChristina. (2016). Legal Explanation of General Principles of Good Government. Institute for Studies and Advocacy for Judicial Independence (LeIP), 93.
11) Rizkyta Amelia , & Ningsih Bunga. (2022). Abuse of Authority Based on the State Administrative Court and Corruption Crime Court. Journal of Legal Essentials, 132.
12) Sahlan Muhammad. (2016). Elements of Abuse of Authority in Corruption Crimes as Absolute Competency of Administrative Justice. IUS QUIA IUSTUM Law Journal, vol 23.
13) SFMarbun. (2018). State Administrative Law I p. 67. Yogyakarta: FH UII Press.
14) SihotangGitha, & et al. (2017). Discretion and Responsibility of Public Officials in Carrying Out Duties in Emergency Situations. Law Reform, 65.
15) Simanjuntak Enrico. (2018). State Administrative Court Procedure Law: Transformation & Reflection. Jakarta: Sinar Graphics.
16) MainKartika. (2015). Positive Fictitious State Administrative Decree. Notarial Journal, 146.
17) WairocanaI Gusti, & et al. (2020). Obstacles and Methods of State Administrative Court Judges After the Government Administration Law: An Approach to Handling Positive Fictitious Cases. Journal of Law and Development, 565.
18) Wicaksono Dian, Hantoro Bima, & Kurniawan Dedy. (2021). Qua Vadis Regulation of the Authority of the State Administrative Court in Accepting Positive Fictitious Applications After the Arrangement of Regulations in the Job Creation Law. Rechtsvinding 10, no 2, 334.
19) Yuniza Mailinda , & Inggarwati Melodia. (2021). Opportunities and Challenges for Implementing Positive Fictitious Decisions After the Job Creation Law is Enacted. De Jure Journal, Volume 13 Number 2, 4.
20) Law no. 5 of 1986 concerning State Administrative Courts
21) Law no. 9 of 2004 concerning Amendments to Law No. 5 of 1986 concerning State Administrative Courts.
22) Law no. 30 of 2014 concerning Government Administration
23) Supreme Court Regulation no. 5 of 2015 concerning Procedure Guidelines for Obtaining Decisions on Acceptance of Applications to Obtain Decisions and/or Actions from Government Agencies or Officials
24) Supreme Court Regulation Number 8 of 2017 concerning Amendments to Supreme Court Regulation Number 5 of 2015 Guidelines for Procedures for Obtaining Decisions on the Acceptance of Applications to Obtain Decisions and/or Actions by Government Agencies or Officials.
25) Law Number 51 of 2009 concerning the Second Amendment to Law Number 5 of 1986 concerning State Administrative Courts (State Gazette of the Republic of Indonesia of 2009 Number 160, Supplement to the State Gazette of the Republic of Indonesia Number 5079)