Volume 07 Issue 01 January 2024
1Dwi Tatak Subagiyo, 2Delycia Revita, 3Noer Chalim, 4Samsul Arifin
1Faculty of Law, Wijaya Kusuma Surabaya University
2,3,4Student Magister of Law, Faculty of Law, Wijaya Kusuma Surabaya University
DOI : https://doi.org/10.47191/ijsshr/v7-i01-42Google Scholar Download Pdf
ABSTRACT
This This research aims to find out whether there are cases in criminal cases that violate Law Number 42 of 1999 concerning Fiduciary Guarantees, so that readers can find out about the regulation of fiduciary guarantees in terms of Law Number 42 of 1999 concerning Fiduciary Guarantees. And so that you can find out about the criminal liability of renting out goods that are the object of fiduciary collateral without written permission from the fiduciary recipient. And also so that it can be a lesson for all of us. And also the results of research files pekara I meticulously and from several sources or literary I read. Sehububungan with the use of the juridical normative research type, then approach the problem using an approach case case approach. Statutory approach used by the research because this research focuses on the study of norms in a rule of law especially those associated directly with the fiduciary guarantee legislation. The use of case approach in this research aims to study the application of legal rules or norms that are done in the practice of law. In such cases it is clear that in the docket which I read was already plain to see that the perpetrators are found guilty and has been deliberately doing acts that violate the Law Number 42 in 1999 about the Fiduciary Guarantee. And also the results of this research confirms the fiduciary banned Givers turn, mortgaged, or meyewakan to any other objects into the object fiduciary guarantee that cannot be an inventory object, except with the consent of the recipient of the first tertukis fiduciary. as stipulated in article 36 Jo Article 23 paragraph (2) of ACT No. 42 of 1999 RI about the Fiduciary Guarantee. It is intended, in order to give legal certainty to the fiduciary guarantee.
KEYWORDS:Fiduciary liability, Guarantee of criminal agains the offender.
REFERENCES1) Undang-Undang Dasar Republik Indonesia Tahun 1945.
2) Burgerlijk Wetboek.
3) Reglemen Indonesia yang Diperbarui (RIB).
4) Undang-undang No.42 Tahun 1999 tentang Jaminan Fidusia.
5) Keputusan Presiden No.139 Tahun 2000 tentang Pembentukan Kantor Pendaftaran Fidusia Di Setiap Ibukota Provinsi Di Wilayah Negara Republik Indonesia.
6) Keputusan Mentri Kehakiman dan Hak Asasi Manusia RI No.M.01-UM.01.06 Tahun 2000 tentang Bentuk Formulir dan Tata Cara Pendaftaran Jaminan Fidusia.
7) Peraturan Kapolri Nomor 8 Tahun 2011 tentang Pengamanan Eksekusi Jaminan Fidusia.
8) Andi Prajitno, Hukum Fidusia, Cetakan Pertama, Bayu Media Publishing, Malang, 2009.
9) Gunawan Widjaja dan Ahmad Yani, Jaminan Fidusia, Raja Grafindo Persada,Jakarta, 2001.
10) J. Satrio, Hukum Jaminan Hak Jaminan Kebendaan Fidusia, Citra Aditya Bhakti, Bandung, 2002.
11) Munir Fuady, Jaminan Fidusia, Cetakan Pertama, Citra Angkasa, Jakarta, 1991.
12) Oey Hoey Tiong, Fidusia Sebagai Jaminan Unsur Unsur Perikatan, Dahlia Indonesia, Jakarta, 1985.
13) Peter Machmud Marzuki, Penelitian Hukum, Prenada Media, Jakarta, 2005.
14) Subekti, Hukum Perjanjian, Cetakan Ke-12, PT. Intermasa, Jakarta, 1990.
15) Tan Kamelo, Hukum Jaminan Fidusia Suatu Kebutuhan Yang Didambakan, Cetakan Kedua, Alumni, Bandung, 2006.
16) Widjaya, Gunawan dan Ahmad Yani, Jaminan Fidusia, Raja Grafindo Persada,Jakarta, 2001.
17) www.sultanahmadjambe.blogspot.com/masalahhukumjaminanfidusiadanpertanggugjawabanparapihak, Masalah Hukum Jaminan Fidusia dan Pertanggung Jawaban Para Pihak, diunduh pada 19 Juli 2023 pukul 13.00 wib.
18) www.sultanahmadjambe.blogspot.com/masalahhukumjaminanfidusiadanpertanggugjawabanparapihak , Masalah hukum jaminan fidusia dan pertanggung jawaban para pihak, diunduh pada 9 Januari 2024 pukul 13.00 wib