Volume 07 Issue 01 January 2024
1Erlangga, 2Astri Yuliyanti Monita, 3Bobyanto, 4Joko Nur Sariono
1,2,3Magister of Law, Faculty of Law, Wijaya Kusuma Surabaya University.
4Faculty of Law, Wijaya Kusuma Surabaya University.
DOI : https://doi.org/10.47191/ijsshr/v7-i01-69Google Scholar Download Pdf
ABSTRACT
The research article entitled The Criminal Concept of Additional Compensation Money in Corruption Crimes Based on Law no. 20 of 2001 concerning the Eradication of Corruption Crimes with the formulation of the problem and research objectives: What is the concept of additional criminal charges for replacement money in criminal acts of corruption based on Law Number 20 of 2001 concerning the Eradication of Corruption Crimes. The approach method used is normative juridical research, and uses a statutory approach and a conceptual approach. Resulting in the following findings/conclusions. The Prosecutor's failure to execute the compensation money in criminal acts of corruption is not optimal, basically it is not something that is desired or intentional, but there are juridical obstacles to the court's decision. The juridical obstacle referred to is the lack of clarity regarding when the execution of a court decision that has permanent legal force is carried out, including Article 270 of the Criminal Procedure Code which states that the execution of a court decision that has permanent legal force is carried out by the prosecutor, after the clerk sends a copy of the decision letter to him, the provisions This requires that the execution can only be carried out and carried out by the prosecutor, after the clerk sends him a copy of the decision letter, so that the defendant refuses to be executed based on a quote from the final decision, in addition to the court decision not providing a legal basis for what the defendant's belongings have been confiscated.
KEYWORDS:replacement money; additional criminal penalties; acts of corruption
REFERENCES1) Criminal Code
2) Criminal Procedure Code
3) Law Number 20 of 2001 concerning Amendments to Law Number 31 of 1999 concerning Eradication of Corruption Crimes.
4) Aga Wiranata, Kendala Jaksa Dalam Eksekusi Pidana Tambahan Uang Pengganti PadaPerkaraTindakPidanaKorupsi, http://download.portalgaruda.org/article.php?article=188096&v al=6466&title=KENDALA%20JAKSA%20DALAM%20EKSEKUSI%20PIDANA%20TAMBA HAN%20UANG%20PENGGANTI%20PADA%20PERKARA%20TINDAK%20PIDANA%20K ORUPSI%20%28Studi%20Kasus%20Korupsi%20Di%20Kejaksaan%20Tinggi%20Jawa-Timur%29 , access 23 Mei 2019.
5) Andi Hamzah, 2008, Perbandingan Pemberantasan Korupsi, Di Berbagai Negara, Jakarta: Penerbit Sinar Grafika.
6) Andi Hamzah, 2012, Pemberantasan Korupsi, Melalui Hukum Pidana Nasional dan Internasional, Jakarta: PT. Raja Grafindo Persada, Jakarta.
7) Ermansjah Djaja, 2010, Mendesain Pengadilan Tindak Pidana Korupsi, Implikasi Putusan Mahakamah Konstitusi Nomor 012-016-019/PPU-IV/2006, Jakarta: Sinar Grafika, Jakarta, 2010.
8) Herbert L. Packer, 1968, The Limits of The Criminal Sanction, Stanford: Stanford University Press.
9) Ilham Gunawan, 1990, Postur Korupsi di Indonesia: Tinjauan Yuridis, Sosiologis, Budaya dan Politik, Bandung: Angkasa.
10) Indriyanto Seno Adji, 2001, Korupsi dan Hukum Pidana, Jakarta: Kantor Pengacara & Konsultasi Hukum “Prof. Oemar Seno Adji, SH & Rekan”.
11) Jan Remmelink, 2003, Hukum Pidana, Komentar Atas Pasal Pasal Terpenting dari Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana Belanda dan Padanannya dalam Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana Indonesia, Jakarta: PT Gramedia Pustaka Utama.
12) Kongres PBB ke-8 mengenai “Prevention Of Crime and Treatment of Offenders” yang mengesahkan resolusi “Corruption in Government” di Havana tahun 1990.
13) Lilik Mulyadi, 2007, Pembalikan Beban Pembuktian Tindak Pidana Korupsi, Bandung: PT. Alumni.
14) Mahrus Ali, 2012, Dasar-Dasar Hukum Pidana. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika.
15) Mungki Hadipratikto, “Eksekusi Putusan Pidana Uang Pengganti Dalam Perkara Pidana Tindak Pidana Korupsi”. https://media.neliti.com/media/publications/10672-ID-eksekusi-putusanpidana-uang-pengganti-dalam-perkaratindak-pidana-korupsi.pdf.
16) Romli Atmasasmita, 2002, Korupsi, Good Governance dan Komisi Anti Korupsi Indonesia, Jakarta: Badan Pembinaan Hukum Nasional Departemen Kehakiman Dan Hak Asasi Manusia Republik Indonesia.
17) Romli Atmasasmita, 2004, Sekitar Masalah Korupsi Aspek Nasional dan Aspek Internasional, Bandung: Mandar Maju.
18) Soedarto, 1986, Kapita Selekta Hukum Pidana, Bandung: Alumni.
19) Surachmin dan Suhandi Cahaya, Strategi & Teknik Korupsi, Mengetahui Untuk Mencegah, Jakarta: Sinar Grafika.
20) Syed Hussein Alatas, 1986, Sosiologi Korupsi, Cetakan Keempat, Jakarta: LP3ES.